| Revision as of 06:07, 7 August 2008 editTxbad1 (talk | contribs)62 edits →August 2008← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:43, 8 August 2008 edit undoKaranacs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users27,644 edits Amber Alert history changesNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| What did I Violate I for 1 am Bruce Seybert and did release the Amber Alert and the Link I Posted was the Facts and History what was wrong?? Please tell! it is My Page! TXBad1 aka Bruce Seybert | What did I Violate I for 1 am Bruce Seybert and did release the Amber Alert and the Link I Posted was the Facts and History what was wrong?? Please tell! it is My Page! TXBad1 aka Bruce Seybert | ||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi, I saw that you reverted my changes to the history section of ]. As you were doing a lot of reversions, I'm unclear whether you meant to do that or not, so I have re-reverted to my version. Just in case you actually meant to do that, let me explain why I made the changes that I did: | |||
| :a) I removed ], so that the article would more neutrally reflect the events that occured. | |||
| :b) I removed excessive detail. This article should not be relating all the details of Amber Hagerman's disappearance and the search for her. Those details belong in the article on ]. Only what is directly relevant to the creation of the AMBER Alert belongs in the article on the AMBER alert. | |||
| :c) The history section contained uncited quotations. That is a big no-no on Misplaced Pages. Quotations should be attributed to ], which could include newspaper and magazines. It does not include self-published websites. | |||
| :d) I rewrote the section so that it had a proper encyclopedic tone. | |||
| :e) I also wikified the article, so that it now has wikilinks to let people get more information about different people or concepts mentioned. | |||
| If you believe any of the information I removed actually does belong in the article, please discuss your changes on the ] first. | |||
| Furthermore, I see that you have self-identified as being someone associated with the AMBER alert. For your own protection, it might be wise to read ] so that you do not inadvertently violate the guideline. Please note that being involved in real-life with the article topic does not make you the ]; on Misplaced Pages everyone is encouraged to edit every article. ] (]) 13:43, 8 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:43, 8 August 2008
August 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page AMBER Alert do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Misplaced Pages is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Misplaced Pages uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TerriersFan (talk) 23:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
What did I Violate I for 1 am Bruce Seybert and did release the Amber Alert and the Link I Posted was the Facts and History what was wrong?? Please tell! it is My Page! TXBad1 aka Bruce Seybert
Amber Alert
Hi, I saw that you reverted my changes to the history section of AMBER Alert. As you were doing a lot of reversions, I'm unclear whether you meant to do that or not, so I have re-reverted to my version. Just in case you actually meant to do that, let me explain why I made the changes that I did:
- a) I removed POV, so that the article would more neutrally reflect the events that occured.
- b) I removed excessive detail. This article should not be relating all the details of Amber Hagerman's disappearance and the search for her. Those details belong in the article on Amber Hagerman. Only what is directly relevant to the creation of the AMBER Alert belongs in the article on the AMBER alert.
- c) The history section contained uncited quotations. That is a big no-no on Misplaced Pages. Quotations should be attributed to reliable sources, which could include newspaper and magazines. It does not include self-published websites.
- d) I rewrote the section so that it had a proper encyclopedic tone.
- e) I also wikified the article, so that it now has wikilinks to let people get more information about different people or concepts mentioned.
If you believe any of the information I removed actually does belong in the article, please discuss your changes on the article talk page first. Furthermore, I see that you have self-identified as being someone associated with the AMBER alert. For your own protection, it might be wise to read Misplaced Pages's conflict of interest policy so that you do not inadvertently violate the guideline. Please note that being involved in real-life with the article topic does not make you the owner of the article; on Misplaced Pages everyone is encouraged to edit every article. Karanacs (talk) 13:43, 8 August 2008 (UTC)