| Revision as of 23:18, 12 September 2005 editCarnildo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,473 edits →[]: Delete, ban SPUI← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:26, 12 September 2005 edit undoSPUI (talk | contribs)75,418 edits it's not a personal attack if it's true, assholesNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| ] | |||
| nn road '''Delete''' --] 02:04, 12 September 2005 (UTC) | nn road '''Delete''' --] 02:04, 12 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:26, 12 September 2005
New Hampshire Route 118
nn road Delete --Aranda56 02:04, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
Keep We keep all the state highways in the US... evidence that California State Route 259 is a short highway, but it has a nice article. This is the sort of article that NH-118 can become... eventually a WP for NH roads will be started and this article will be improved then, if not before... Also note Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Florida State Road 300 and Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Ontario provincial highway 140. --Rschen7754 03:44, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. --Tony Sidaway 12:52, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless expanded. This is a minor road that links a town of 3000 to a town of 1000.
- Keep per policy. Karmafist 14:24, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- What policy? Gazpacho
- Delete. Non-notable roadcruft. I would never support any kind of convention that calls for automatic keeping of anything, least of all road articles. / Peter 15:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as per Rschen. ≈ jossi ≈ 15:45, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn transport route. The nearby Boston & Maine Railroad and the Warren to Woodstock Carriage Road have some history, but this apparently does not, so a mention in the town articles and in a list is sufficient. FYI I don't think the CA259 article is so great. Gazpacho 16:03, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless more info is added (history, notable facts...). A mere list of towns and intersections a road traverses does not warrant an article. -- Klafubra 16:34, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless it can be shown that the road has any more notability than as a path between two points, with a few others in between. Auto-keeping huge classes of articles (I think it's okay to automatically keep any US presidents, for instance, or Kings and Queens of England) is the path to darkness and doom. --Icelight 17:42, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, we keep numbered highways per prior consensus and precedent. Even if this is a bad article it will be expanded eventually as part of a NH highway Wikiproject. Gateman1997 17:58, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- I think it would be more accurate to say that they are kept through a lack of consensus to delete rather than a consensus to keep. Lord Bob 18:55, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep all numbered state, U.S. and Interstate routes as products of substantial state and federal-level governmental action. As long as the consensus here is to keep every school, I believe roads are *at least* as notable, if not more so. FCYTravis 18:15, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- No vote on this article, but I feel compelled to object to that last remark. It is not true that there is "consensus here to keep every school." This has been demonstrated time and again for at least two years. In fact the (inactive) page WP:WIWO bears no less than three warnings that "There is currently no consensus about inclusion of schools, and adding your signature here is not going to help create one." Dpbsmith (talk) 22:54, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete roads which are not notable for something other than being a road, this one included. Lord Bob 18:55, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep and ban the asshole deletionists. --SPUI (talk) 22:43, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. SPUI, no personal attacks please. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:01, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and ban User:SPUI for personal attacks. --Carnildo 23:18, 12 September 2005 (UTC)