Misplaced Pages

User talk:Thatcher/Alpha: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Thatcher Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:57, 10 June 2008 view sourceThatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits tweak← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:06, 23 August 2008 view source Thatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 editsm Changed protection level for "User talk:Thatcher/Alpha": possibly not needed  
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{User:Thatcher/Links}} {{User:Thatcher/Links}}


== Homeopathy /Evidence == == History archive ==
This page contains the entire history of my previous talk page. As it has become a vandal target, but has over 5000 edits, making deletion a problem, I moved the history to a history-only archive, to start a fresh new talk page. For most purposes, my traditional archives will be more useful. ] 11:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Is there some way to see a scrubbed version of ] as a normal user? Should I be asking someone else about this? Thanks, ] (]) 17:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
*Wow, I didn't see that when it happened. Scrubbing it would have to be a manual job and I don't even know what was allegedly revealed. You might the clerk listed as handling the case if he has the time to make a scrubbed version; otherwise ask arbcom or Dmcdevit I guess. ] 18:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
::Thanks, I hadn't noticed there's a listed clerk. ] (]) 20:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

== Fuss ==

Ok, I'll be a good boy. <font face="Kristen ITC">''']''' <sup>'']''</sup></font> 23:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

== Recarnation of Azukimonaka? ==

Hi, Thatcher. Can you check this seemingly sock IP(s) of {{User|Azukimonaka}}/{{User|KoreanShoriSenyou}} and his multiple gangs? Recently, ] article has been (typically) vandalised by very persistent ] IP user(s) over the same matter just like Azukimonaka did on the manhwa related articles. The ocn anon(s) appeared to blank the same thing at ] which he also did. Thanks. *{{user|61.119.138.171}}
*{{user|211.129.140.247}}
*{{user|220.104.47.22}}
*{{user|221.184.41.234}}
*{{user|124.86.248.112}}
--] (]) 01:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Even if the anon in question is not related to Azukimonaka, another obvious sock {{User|Jazz81089}} seems to be related to him/her. per the long break from 8 months and the timing. Can you look at the sock? Thanks.-] (]) 21:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

:Thank you for taking the case, but I can't prevent the disruptive removals and POV pushing by this obviously Azukimonaka-ish ocn. anon and sock account Jazz81089. Besides, if Jazz81089 uses ocn.ne.jp IP, he clearly violated 3RR rules. I talked to the anon/jazz to participate in an open discussion countless times, and even requested RFC, but his disruption does not stop. So typical ] is no use because he has not responded to any of them. In such case, what else can I do? File this at ] or ] or just keep reverting his blanking after my limit of 3 time reverts is over? --] (]) 03:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
:Thank you for protecting the page, but the last edit was by {{User|Jazz81089}}. Until he edited, the lead section clearly said about Korean ] and the current protected page only supports the disruptive anon/{{User|Jazz81089}}. The work is created by Korean artists and my version is a compromised version, but he does not listen to. Can you revert his edit? Thanks. --] (]) 03:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
::I only semi-protected the article. Anonymous IP editors may not make changes but registered users such as yourself can. ] 11:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

== ] ==

This user is challenging his 2-month block for sockpuppetry, based on a "likely" finding you gave at ]. Can you comment about what you found? He seems to think that the checkuser result identified him as having the same ISP... I don't believe that but it's probably best if you comment. ]]<sup>]</sup> 20:42, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
*Left comment. ] 02:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

== blocking IP range ==

Greatings, some of the registered user from bosnian Misplaced Pages have complained about blocking their IP addresses see . Can you resolve the problem please, thanks in advance.--] (]) 09:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
*There have been a lot of inappropriate edits there. Certainly I would not want to think that any of the bosnian wikipedia editors were responsble and wanted to edit anonymously to avoid being connected to their home accounts. Anonymous editors are blocked but editors with accounts on enwiki can still edit. I suggest they either create a ] so they would have a single account on all wikis, or they ask the unblock-L mailing list to create an enwiki account for them. Either way, they would then have an account here and could edit from that range with no problems. ] 11:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

::Thank you very much for your reply. We already solved the ''mistery''. Affected user(s) don't have unified account, and I'm afraid she/he cannot do that because affected username is already occupied on en.wikipedia. Anyway, thanks a lot. Best regards--] (]) 12:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

== Sockpuppet ==

Hi. I’m directing this message to you because you were the one who confirmed the ]. This is a very difficult case because the guy has been creating numerous accounts to evade blocks. On no.wikipedia, he has come clean, and the community has decided to give him a second chance, but here they all got blocked. Of course he has created another account here, no surprise, ] (confirmed on ]). I just thought I’d let you know, so you can decide what to do with it. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<small>(]&nbsp;·&nbsp;]&nbsp;·&nbsp;])</small> 21:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
*Thanks. I don't usually make blocking decisions on my own technical findings, the place to ask would be the ]. ] 21:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
*:Thanks for a quick reply. Because the user has been annoying me and loads of other users on no.wikipedia I just asked for a second opinion. I don’t know if the community wants to give him a second chance. I’ll write something on WP:ANI. Thanks! ;) &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<small>(]&nbsp;·&nbsp;]&nbsp;·&nbsp;])</small> 21:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

== Checkuser activity ==

Would you be able to comment at ]? Thanks. I also mentioned this (and you by name) at ]. Apologies if my impressions were mistaken. I think I should have asked you and Raul at your talk pages before mentioning your names at the ANI thread. This is one reason why I would like to see activity logs, as that would confirm impressions and correct mistaken impressions. ] (]) 11:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:06, 23 August 2008

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    My admin actions
    ContribsBlocksProtectsDeletions
    Admin links
    NoticeboardIncidentsAIV3RR
    CSDProdAfD
    BacklogImagesRFUAutoblocks
    Articles
    GANCriteriaProcessContent RFC
    Checkuser and Oversight
    CheckuserOversight logSuppression log
    SUL toolUser rightsAll range blocks
    Tor checkGeolocateGeolocateHoney pot
    RBL lookupDNSstuffAbusive Hosts
    Wikistalk toolSingle IP lookup
    Other wikis
    QuoteMetaCommons
    Template links
    PiggybankTor listLinks
    Other
    TempSandbox1Sandbox3Sandbox4
    WikistalkWannabe Kate's toolPrefix index
    Contribs by pageWatchlist count
    Talk archives
    12345678910

    11121314151617181920

    21222324252627282930

    History archive

    This page contains the entire history of my previous talk page. As it has become a vandal target, but has over 5000 edits, making deletion a problem, I moved the history to a history-only archive, to start a fresh new talk page. For most purposes, my traditional archives will be more useful. Thatcher 11:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)