Misplaced Pages

User talk:KrakatoaKatie: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:57, 24 August 2008 editKrakatoaKatie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators34,309 edits →May contain nuts: rm section (canvassing)← Previous edit Revision as of 07:46, 24 August 2008 edit undoKM*hearts*MC (talk | contribs)272 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 76: Line 76:


you seem to have hastily made a edit protect without adequate discussion on article talk page in ]..please undo your actions..user:lihaas motives questionable!there seems to be no dispute after merger..further all edits were referenced, neutral and verifiable (if you dont succumb to propaganda, you can check them individually)..at a bare minimum i request you to reverse your edit protect..thanks..] (]) 23:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC) you seem to have hastily made a edit protect without adequate discussion on article talk page in ]..please undo your actions..user:lihaas motives questionable!there seems to be no dispute after merger..further all edits were referenced, neutral and verifiable (if you dont succumb to propaganda, you can check them individually)..at a bare minimum i request you to reverse your edit protect..thanks..] (]) 23:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

==WP:AIV==
What seriously are you on? Can you read English? How can someone who vandalize articles and '''is''' warned by several editors not a vandal? 90% of his/her edits have been reverted. I'm sorry I'm not on Wiki every waking moment to catch someone as soon as they make the edit. Just because he or she doesn't follow the usual pattern of a vandal doesn't make them one. Additionally, I made no comment to WP:3RR, so I don't know where that. I am replacing my request back on the board and asking that it be looked at by editor as you clearly cannot perform your job duties. ] (]) 07:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:46, 24 August 2008

Thanks for visiting my talk page.

If you are considering posting a message for me, please observe Wikiquette:

*post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
*use headlines when starting new talk topics.
*comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article – not here.
*do not make personal attacks or use the page for harassment of anyone.
*sign your messages with four tildes like this ~~~~ .
(If you don't sign, I probably won't reply because I won't know who you are.)

Comments which fail to follow the five rules above may be immediately archived or deleted.

Thanks again for visiting.

Talk archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14




















A small question

Just out of curiosity - why did you cascade protect User:KrakatoaKatie/PGPkey? (Specifically the cascade bit.) -- Mentisock 10:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply and for fixing it. :-) -- Mentisock 09:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Kanabekobaton/Euroleague

I changed my RFCU rationale from F to G because the account was around for a while before I posted to AN. The change to Kanabekobaton's userpage, the block on the Japanese Misplaced Pages, and the timing of the SUL registrations are all suspicious, though. DarkAudit (talk) 01:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep an eye on beauty pageants, television stations/networks, Eurovision, and the Olympics. Those seem to be the big targets. DarkAudit (talk) 01:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
74.85.13.56 reverted a couple of reversions of Euroleague's edits, and is going after similar athletics pages at present. Keep an eye out. DarkAudit (talk) 02:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

dont get swayed by propaganda

you seem to have hastily made a edit protect without adequate discussion on article talk page in amarnath land transfer controversy..please undo your actions..user:lihaas motives questionable!there seems to be no dispute after merger..further all edits were referenced, neutral and verifiable (if you dont succumb to propaganda, you can check them individually)..at a bare minimum i request you to reverse your edit protect..thanks..Kashmircloud (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV

What seriously are you on? Can you read English? How can someone who vandalize articles and is warned by several editors not a vandal? 90% of his/her edits have been reverted. I'm sorry I'm not on Wiki every waking moment to catch someone as soon as they make the edit. Just because he or she doesn't follow the usual pattern of a vandal doesn't make them one. Additionally, I made no comment to WP:3RR, so I don't know where that. I am replacing my request back on the board and asking that it be looked at by editor as you clearly cannot perform your job duties. KM*hearts*MC (talk) 07:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)