Revision as of 09:08, 4 September 2008 editEveryme (talk | contribs)3,624 edits →RfA double !votes: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:22, 4 September 2008 edit undoDweller (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Oversighters, Administrators55,877 edits →Your RfA contributions: clarifyNext edit → | ||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
I've indented your inadvertent double !votes and . <span style="font-family:lucida sans, console;">''''']:]'''''</span> 09:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC) | I've indented your inadvertent double !votes and . <span style="font-family:lucida sans, console;">''''']:]'''''</span> 09:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Your RfA contributions == | |||
Hi. I'm a little concerned by some of your recent RfA contributions, including two incidents of double-voting and ] over lack of experience for a candidate with masses of experience, way beyond the norm for RfA. (Please return to the RfA and clarify your comment) | |||
Please be more careful at RfA. --] (]) 09:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:22, 4 September 2008
|
Thankyou
Just a little note to say thankyou for participating in my successful RFA candidacy, which passed with 96 supports, 0 opposes, and 1 neutral. I am pleasantly taken aback by the amount of support for me to contribute in an administrative role and look forward to demonstrating that such faith is well placed. Regards, WilliamH (talk) 09:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)th
Edit summaries
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Happyme22 (talk) 23:53, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
RfA double !votes
I've indented your inadvertent double !votes here and here. user:Everyme 09:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Your RfA contributions
Hi. I'm a little concerned by some of your recent RfA contributions, including two incidents of double-voting and a baffling oppose over lack of experience for a candidate with masses of experience, way beyond the norm for RfA. (Please return to the RfA and clarify your comment)
Please be more careful at RfA. --Dweller (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)