Misplaced Pages

Talk:Weather Underground Organization/Terrorism RfC: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Weather Underground Organization Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:31, 5 September 2008 editWikidemon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers36,531 edits →Request for Comment: Description of Weathermen as "terrorists"← Previous edit Revision as of 19:31, 5 September 2008 edit undoNoroton (talk | contribs)37,252 edits →Proposals, discussions: proposalNext edit →
Line 36: Line 36:
===Statement by party2=== ===Statement by party2===
==Proposals, discussions== ==Proposals, discussions==
I propose that edits to any of these articles that follow ] be allowed. -- ] (]) 19:31, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:31, 5 September 2008

Request for Comment: Description of Weathermen as "terrorists"

Template:RFCpol

  • In the past several months repeated disagreements and edit warring have arisen regarding whether Misplaced Pages should describe the Weathermen, and their various members, as "terrorists".
  • Articles affected include:
  • Relevant issues include:
  • Designating the Weathermen as "terrorists"
  • Describing various acts as "terrorism"
  • Identifying the organization with the word "terrorism" (e.g. in the lead, when the organization is introduced in other articles, etc)
  • Covering, or noting, that the group is widely described as terrorist
  • Covering, or noting, that some people have described them as terrorist or that there is disagreement as to the label
  • Where to put the material - one article or many? In a section? In the lead? Footnotes? In BLPs?
  • Applying terrorism-related categories to these articles
  • Relevant policies, guidelines, and essays
  • Issues specifically avoided:
  • This is deliberately intended not to be a discussion of editing process or editor behavior
  • Please keep discussion focused on the content question and not on other editors - if you have a complaint about another editor there are other forums. Should editing abuse become a problem on this page we should discuss that at some other page or a subsection here.
  • Notification of involved parties:
(will complete later - feel free to self-nominate or withdraw - Wikidemon (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Party1
  • Party2

Statements from involved parties

Best if we can keep these clean and reserve disagreements for the "discussion" section or for each editor's own statement - Wikidemon (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Statement by party1

Statement by party2

Statements by uninvolved parties

Statement by party1

Statement by party2

Proposals, discussions

I propose that edits to any of these articles that follow WP:TERRORISM be allowed. -- Noroton (talk) 19:31, 5 September 2008 (UTC)