User talk:Needlepinch: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:43, 5 June 2008 editNeedlepinch (talk \| contribs)304 edits →June 2008 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:05, 7 September 2008 edit undoFugu Alienking (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users833 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Mikael Ljungman. (TW)Next edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:

	:It seems that you are on smear campaign again. You have obviously something against Ljungman and Freer or Freers contact with Ljungman or vice versa.--] (]) 00:42, 5 June 2008 (UTC)		:It seems that you are on smear campaign again. You have obviously something against Ljungman and Freer or Freers contact with Ljungman or vice versa.--] (]) 00:42, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

			== September 2008 ==
			] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Mikael Ljungman\| according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''Please use the Talk Page as requested by other editors'' ] (]) 15:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:05, 7 September 2008

May 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Mikael Ljungman, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Misplaced Pages:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Much of the material you added has already been rejected by other editors for reasons stated in the edit logs. Other parts are unsourced claims about the background of this gentleman, and modifications of references from the original newspaper article to a blog posting. Fugu Alienking (talk) 21:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Media Power Inc

A tag has been placed on Media Power Inc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Misplaced Pages:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Avnjay 13:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Mikael Ljungman's legal troubles

You have repeatedly removed sourced content in what looks like an attempt to whitewash Ljungman. In my opinion that borders on vandalism. So please stop; if you think that mentioning his conviction is inappropriate despite the sources, please discuss it on the article's talk page. Yours, Huon (talk) 17:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I have tried to clean up some of the Fugu Alienking "black wash" This in not a way to whitewash Ljungman its a way to find a balance.(talk)

I had to correct the text I wrote about his conviction; I misread the source. But I came to the conclusion that there's too little reliable information about Ljungman to warrant a Misplaced Pages article (for example, I couldn't even find out when he was convicted); I have thus nominated the article for deletion. The deletion discussion is here. Yours, Huon (talk) 21:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mikael Ljungman. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Fugu Alienking (talk) 20:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

The profile of Ljungman went thru a process. After that process you and others start to change what several editors agreed on. --Needlepinch (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

The process it went through was a discussion over whether it should be deleted. Because the user who initially nominated it for deletion changed his mind, it was kept. At no stage did people get together and decide that the article or any part of it should not be changed. This is Misplaced Pages, that does not happen. --Fugu Alienking (talk) 21:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

It seems that you are on smear campaign again. You have obviously something against Ljungman and Freer or Freers contact with Ljungman or vice versa.--Needlepinch (talk) 00:42, 5 June 2008 (UTC)