| Revision as of 13:45, 5 September 2008 editThe Ogre (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,868 edits →Sockpuppetry: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:06, 7 September 2008 edit undoThe Ogre (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,868 edits →3RR: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| A case against you has been opened at ]. ] (]) 13:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | A case against you has been opened at ]. ] (]) 13:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == 3RR == | |||
| {{uw-3rr|Joaquim Maria Machado de Assis}} ] (]) 15:06, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:06, 7 September 2008
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Searchtruthseeker (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Afro-Brazilian
Your text is more appropriate in the genetics section. Cite references. If they are not avaiable now, use the tag . Keep walking. --Quissamã (talk) 17:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
The introduction should be just a very short and general text. There is too much detail.
--Quissamã (talk) 18:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
You need to provide more precise references. Name the source article.
--Quissamã (talk) 04:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
A case against you has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Searchtruthseeker. The Ogre (talk) 13:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
3RR
Your recent editing history at Joaquim Maria Machado de Assis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Ogre (talk) 15:06, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Category: