Misplaced Pages

User talk:Chuletadechancho: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:27, 17 September 2008 editKiteinthewind (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,140 edits Nomination of Xidan with Malice: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 01:46, 17 September 2008 edit undoKiteinthewind (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,140 edits Caution: Defamation not specifically directed. (TW)Next edit →
Line 39: Line 39:


Your actions has demonstrated that you have, maliciously, made a bad faith nomination on a perfectly fine page. This is your warning. Do not do this again. ] (]) 00:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC) Your actions has demonstrated that you have, maliciously, made a bad faith nomination on a perfectly fine page. This is your warning. Do not do this again. ] (]) 00:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

== September 2008 ==
] Please do not add ] content to Misplaced Pages{{#if:|, as you did to ]}}. If you would like to experiment please use the ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-defamatory2 --> ] (]) 01:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:46, 17 September 2008

Welcome!

Hello, Chuletadechancho, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

ϢereSpielChequers 08:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Image requests and comments

Thanks for the feedback. I'll look into tackling your image requests when the time permits.
p.s. Glad you like the name. --SeedFeeder (talk) 08:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Like to be fed seed? Good for you! Not all of us can be honest about our desires... --SeedFeeder (talk) 09:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

irrumatio

I moved your comments from my talk page to talk of template:sex and put my response there. Zodon (talk) 20:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD for Xidan

In the future, please do more research before determining whether to start a deletion process. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 22:10, 16 September 2008 (UTC) How so? What research? Please point me to sources, I would love to clean up the article.Chuletadechancho (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll take it from here, thank you. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 22:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
I believe the article should stay because geographical features are inherently notable. This is a significant commercial area within the city of Beijing, with various articles that asserts its existence and importance (albeit written in the Chinese language, but that does not make it any less reliable or significant). Therefore, your AfD, I believe, it not valid (at best) in the first place, and (at worst) it was made in bad faith). Arbiteroftruth (talk) 22:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Geographical features are notable, however those would be cities, towns, mountains, rivers, lakes, districts (such as gov't recognized historic districts and geographically demarcated electoral districts), neighborhoods (with neighborhood councils), shopping areas are not notable on their own. If it were so significant there would be sources. I looked for some and found none. Chinese sources count! Show them off, provide a link, we can get them translated even by machine to get a gist of it and determine if it is reliable, do you have Chinese language newspapers or magazine articles or the Xidan website? A travel guide? anything? It wasis entirely valid, since any article without any sources can be nominated, whether you like or agree with it or not, and this was completely in good faith, i looked for sources and found none. have a good day.Chuletadechancho (talk) 22:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Xidan with Malice

You claimed to have conducted a search, but you have not. Had you searched seriously, you would have found an article on the Beijing Olympics page describing the place. That establishes Xidan's existence, as well as its notability.

Your actions has demonstrated that you have, maliciously, made a bad faith nomination on a perfectly fine page. This is your warning. Do not do this again. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 00:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Please do not add defamatory content to Misplaced Pages. If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox. Thank you. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 01:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)