| Revision as of 23:56, 28 September 2008 view sourceElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,960 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Battle of Opis. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:45, 29 September 2008 view source Jehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,282 editsm →Request: copy editNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
| == September 2008 == | == September 2008 == | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Battle of Opis|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]]] 23:56, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Battle of Opis|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]]] 23:56, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==Request== | |||
| If you have a problem with edit warring, you may report it at ] or ]. Please do not cherry pick an administrator who has had a history of disagreements with ChrisO. That's just a recipe for drama, which is not good for Misplaced Pages. Because he is an administrator, ChrisO won't get much sympathy if he continues to break the rules. I for one am thoroughly fed up with his behavior, and have told him so. Edit warring requires two parties. If he were not muddying the waters, these editorial conflicts could be resolved more easily. | |||
| If you file a report, your own behavior will likely be scrutinized. Please follow Elonka's advice above. In addition, know that the ] does not give you the right to one or two reverts. Editors are sometimes blocked for slow edit warring or ], especially if they persistently violate content policies such as ] or ]. The ] has come under intense scrutiny, and further edit warring or content policy violations will be dealt with strictly by other administrators (not me). ] <sup>]</sup> 13:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:45, 29 September 2008
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
I will be relatively busy. You can also e-mail me with any other inquiries and I might respond back. Remember Misplaced Pages is as reliable as its editors and many of its editors with regards to social sciences are not reliable.
/Designation of the term Iran from Sassanids till the establishment of the Safavid dynasty
/Al-Khwarizmi the Mathematician
/Some notes on Shaykh Safi al-Din Ardabili
Thanks
|
The Barnstar of Diligence
for your excellent work in Shahnameh and other Iranian articles. You are an "exception" among Misplaced Pages Users. --Pejman47 20:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC) |
On the Khuzestan Province
Thank you for your message. You may be interested to peruse the texts here: and here . Kind regards, --BF 20:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC).
Image:PersepolisRelief.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:PersepolisRelief.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Image permission problem with Image:PersepolisRelief.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PersepolisRelief.jpg, which you've sourced to www.immortals.blogfa.com. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
On Unruled Paper (film)
You may wish to participate in the on-going discussion here: . --BF 12:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind sentiments. Best regards, --BF 06:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC).
Hello there ...
:-) Tājik (talk) 16:46, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Battle of Opis. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Elonka 23:56, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Request
If you have a problem with edit warring, you may report it at administrators incidents noticeboard or three revert rule noticeboard. Please do not cherry pick an administrator who has had a history of disagreements with ChrisO. That's just a recipe for drama, which is not good for Misplaced Pages. Because he is an administrator, ChrisO won't get much sympathy if he continues to break the rules. I for one am thoroughly fed up with his behavior, and have told him so. Edit warring requires two parties. If he were not muddying the waters, these editorial conflicts could be resolved more easily.
If you file a report, your own behavior will likely be scrutinized. Please follow Elonka's advice above. In addition, know that the three revert rule does not give you the right to one or two reverts. Editors are sometimes blocked for slow edit warring or tendentious editing, especially if they persistently violate content policies such as neutral point of view or verifiability. The Battle of Opis has come under intense scrutiny, and further edit warring or content policy violations will be dealt with strictly by other administrators (not me). Jehochman 13:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC)