Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 13:53, 8 October 2008

Poland Stub‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

I'm not sure how notable a guy can be when most of his notability comes from a redlinked book. Even given the rest, if the book isn't notable enough to be here it's a strong indication it's author isn't either. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 14:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

The article was posted about an hour ago, so no article on book, yet. The guy have his PL article, his activities there covered by BBC News and his trial was described as the first serious case of Holocaust denial in the Poland. In my view he is notable enough, especially knowing that his works are used in wikipedia articles. Readers should know about his claims credibility, M.K. (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

That sounds good, then. I'll go remove the notability tag. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 14:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, then M.K. (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

He is notable: 1) publications 2) news coverage and 3) political involvement with LPR party.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

weasel wording

"author appears to agree with Holocaust deniers who claim that for technical reasons it was not possible to kill millions of people in the Nazi gas chambers". To say something appears to agree with something is not NPOV. In whoose opinion. This needs attribution in addition to citation. Does the subject actualy say the samething as the deniers?--Doc 22:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

The source of such claim was present at the end of sentence. I also added additional attribution to the claim now. Hope this will solve the problem. M.K. (talk) 09:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

It does, thanks. Sometimes it is easy to forget that sourcing and attribution are not identical. Facts need sourced, judgements need attributed and sourced.--Doc 10:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I see, thanks for heads up. Take care, M.K. (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

League of Polish Families extreme right party

League of Polish Families is/was extreme right party as noted in academic source: Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe By Cas Mudde 2005 p.159 - The League of Polish Families (Liga Polskich Rodzin, LPR), which incorporates the All-Polish Youth (MW, see below) as its youth wing, is currently the main extreme right political party active on the parliamentary level. It was formed shortly before the September 2001 parliamentary election... Therefore I see no reason to remove this information, as was did . M.K. (talk) 13:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

• Stub-Class Poland articles
• Mid-importance Poland articles
• WikiProject Poland articles