Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ksempac: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:06, 25 September 2008 editKevinalewis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers90,415 edits sorry← Previous edit Revision as of 13:19, 9 October 2008 edit undoEEMIV (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,045 edits There is nothing..Next edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
==Talk page== ==Talk page==
:Put back - my mistake - although I don't now how it occured. :: ] : ]/] 09:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC) :Put back - my mistake - although I don't now how it occured. :: ] : ]/] 09:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

== There is nothing.. ==

...sneaky about creating a redirect for such a wholly non-notable, cruft-laden collection of trivial plot summary that is the Lumpy article. --] (]) 13:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

:Furthermore, a redirect is much more often a more appropriate track, since it retains the edit history if some wealth of sources/coverage appear at some point down the line. But, since you apparently prefer AfD to wholly erase that work, well, that's just fine with me. --] (]) 13:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:19, 9 October 2008

Webapps.svg

Hiya, I've added the two source pages to the image's description on Commons, it should be easier to find the references now. - ARC Gritt 12:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Talk page

Put back - my mistake - although I don't now how it occured. :: Kevinalewis : /(Desk) 09:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

There is nothing..

...sneaky about creating a redirect for such a wholly non-notable, cruft-laden collection of trivial plot summary that is the Lumpy article. --EEMIV (talk) 13:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Furthermore, a redirect is much more often a more appropriate track, since it retains the edit history if some wealth of sources/coverage appear at some point down the line. But, since you apparently prefer AfD to wholly erase that work, well, that's just fine with me. --EEMIV (talk) 13:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)