| Revision as of 00:16, 2 October 2005 editFadix (talk | contribs)5,105 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:19, 2 October 2005 edit undoFadix (talk | contribs)5,105 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| **You are mistaken, this is a simple cases, in which a member uses his user page to slander others. I am not the only involved, he also has two administrators and two other members. ] 00:16, 2 October 2005 (UTC) | **You are mistaken, this is a simple cases, in which a member uses his user page to slander others. I am not the only involved, he also has two administrators and two other members. ] 00:16, 2 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| **Well, they are the agressive side. --] ] 00:13, 2 October 2005 (UTC) | **Well, they are the agressive side. --] ] 00:13, 2 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ***While I am ignoring your empy talks, and concentrating on the legitimity of the page, you are justifying and self victimizing yourself. As you probably did when you used IRC once more, to get a member change his vote. Get a life. ] 00:19, 2 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:19, 2 October 2005
User:Cool_Cat/Wiki-politics
I have asked Coolcat to delete that page, he refused to do so. User pages are part of Misplaced Pages, and it is both immature and irresponsible to have such target lists, even more, when the information there has been indicated to be erroneous. Fadix 22:15, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Our userspace it there for content that somehow benefit the Misplaced Pages project. It is not there to provide space for useless mud throwing rants about named wikipedians. -- Karl Meier 22:40, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy keep not covered. --Cool Cat 22:54, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Deletion_policy Userpage included. Fadix 22:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- This isnt over yet. That coment was for VfD. --Cool Cat 23:13, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Deletion_policy Userpage included. Fadix 22:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this one and other "hit lists." says that if user's request the user page or user subpage to be removed, it must be removed. But if it does not, it can be removed by AFD. However, I think this falls under Misplaced Pages:Miscellaneous deletion, but no matter what the case it, hit lists should be strongly discouraged. Zach (Sound Off) 23:03, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- It is not a hitlist. It is a list of peoples actions. --Cool Cat 23:05, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- The so-called Elders of Misplaced Pages "list" too, was allegedly based on peoples action. Besides, it has already been indicated what is the worth of the content. Fadix 23:12, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- The list that Stormfront created? Zach (Sound Off) 23:13, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- The worth of the content, is, about the content of Coolcat pages. Was that what you asked? The first list I was talking about, yes, it was about that. Fadix 23:17, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- That was how I saw the list. Zach (Sound Off) 23:20, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- I do not care about other lists, if I am forbid to record harrasment I recieve this will only make things worse. --Cool Cat 23:15, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- WP:RFC. You can post evidence there, also at WP:RFAr. Zach (Sound Off) 23:20, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- It is not an evidence page. So it tells you on it. --Cool Cat 00:13, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- The worth of the content, is, about the content of Coolcat pages. Was that what you asked? The first list I was talking about, yes, it was about that. Fadix 23:17, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- The list that Stormfront created? Zach (Sound Off) 23:13, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- The so-called Elders of Misplaced Pages "list" too, was allegedly based on peoples action. Besides, it has already been indicated what is the worth of the content. Fadix 23:12, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- It is not a hitlist. It is a list of peoples actions. --Cool Cat 23:05, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Re-list at Misplaced Pages:Miscellaneous deletion, per policy. Jkelly 23:08, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - if it is a "notes to self" page, then why should it be readable by anyone other than Cool Cat. I don't particularly see why anyone should object to it, but also, I don't see why a "notes to self" page should be on the wiki if anyone does disagree with it. The whole issue seems blown way out of propotion to it's importance. JesseW, the juggling janitor 23:15, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Cool Cat tells me that he has no easy place to keep it privately, so, as per my view that this is a non-issue, I'm changing my vote to keep. Now, to the people mentioned on the page - it's already obvious to most people that you all and Cool Cat are fighting, having this page isn't going to change much, either way. Drop it. JesseW, the juggling janitor 23:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- I don't think, you will vote keep, if you were included in such a list, more so, when the content was shown to be not accurate, in the current Arbcom cases, I don't like to be associated with the CIA, neither be accused of POV pushing, when I have spent a considerable amount of time in the project, and even fought against my own personal positions in various occasions. He is free to take a host, and tell how some members hate him. I have tried to kindly ask him to delete that thing, when he already has now, over three mentors to report. And he refused. Fadix 23:27, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- I do not have agree to everything you order me. Mentors ment to monitor my edits, I DONT report to them. This isnt the army boy. --Cool Cat 00:10, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- I don't think, you will vote keep, if you were included in such a list, more so, when the content was shown to be not accurate, in the current Arbcom cases, I don't like to be associated with the CIA, neither be accused of POV pushing, when I have spent a considerable amount of time in the project, and even fought against my own personal positions in various occasions. He is free to take a host, and tell how some members hate him. I have tried to kindly ask him to delete that thing, when he already has now, over three mentors to report. And he refused. Fadix 23:27, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Cool Cat tells me that he has no easy place to keep it privately, so, as per my view that this is a non-issue, I'm changing my vote to keep. Now, to the people mentioned on the page - it's already obvious to most people that you all and Cool Cat are fighting, having this page isn't going to change much, either way. Drop it. JesseW, the juggling janitor 23:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, as per JesseW, the juggling janitor. *SIGH* --Phroziac
00:03, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Why am I not surprised? Perhaps, I shall start a list myself and lie about other members. And dare voting against. Oh, guess what, maybe I should include you also. Fadix 00:08, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Why are we not suprised we are seeing you here, Fadix? I dare you to rant here. --Cool Cat 00:10, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Why am I not surprised? Perhaps, I shall start a list myself and lie about other members. And dare voting against. Oh, guess what, maybe I should include you also. Fadix 00:08, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment I think this discussion belongs in the Dispute Resolution Process, not AfD. Coolcat and Fadix have a long standing rivalry springing from Armenian Genocide, and this just seems to be a continuation of it; Fadix's comments may or may not have merit(i'm fairly neutral), but the rivalry clouds that potential merit. They need to continue talking in the various Dispute Resolution procedures from what little i've seen. If I can help, please let me know. I knew a professor in Holocaust studies back at my alma mater who could look into the accuracy of the article.Karmafist 00:11, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- You are mistaken, this is a simple cases, in which a member uses his user page to slander others. I am not the only involved, he also has two administrators and two other members. Fadix 00:16, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, they are the agressive side. --Cool Cat 00:13, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- While I am ignoring your empy talks, and concentrating on the legitimity of the page, you are justifying and self victimizing yourself. As you probably did when you used IRC once more, to get a member change his vote. Get a life. Fadix 00:19, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
