| Revision as of 04:17, 23 October 2008 editKnowledgeHegemonyPart2 (talk | contribs)3,439 editsm Reverted good faith edits by Sarvagnya; Why was the link re-added? Its already used as a ref!. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:36, 23 October 2008 edit undoSarvagnya (talk | contribs)9,152 editsm minor rewrite of opening line.. moved the drav parties template to see also..Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | '''Anti-Hindi agitation''' refers to the widespread opposition to the ]n Government's attempts to adopt ] as the sole Official language of ] during 1960s. Due to the opposition of non-Hindi speaking members during the formulation of Indian constitution, English was agreed to continue to be the official language of Indian till 1965. | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | '''Anti-Hindi agitation''' |
||
| Adoption of Hindi as an official language was opposed by ], ] of ] and ]. It led to protests in Tamil Nadu including self-inflicted deaths of some youths. Fearing the unity of the country, ], ], ] and ] issued an appeal to the Central Government not to impose Hindi in non-Hindi speaking areas. | Adoption of Hindi as an official language was opposed by ], ] of ] and ]. It led to protests in Tamil Nadu including self-inflicted deaths of some youths. Fearing the unity of the country, ], ], ] and ] issued an appeal to the Central Government not to impose Hindi in non-Hindi speaking areas. | ||
| Line 75: | Line 74: | ||
| | accessdate = 2007-08-30 | | accessdate = 2007-08-30 | ||
| }}</ref>}} | }}</ref>}} | ||
| ==See also== | |||
| ⚫ | * ] | ||
| == References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 19:36, 23 October 2008
Anti-Hindi agitation refers to the widespread opposition to the Indian Government's attempts to adopt Hindi as the sole Official language of India during 1960s. Due to the opposition of non-Hindi speaking members during the formulation of Indian constitution, English was agreed to continue to be the official language of Indian till 1965.
Adoption of Hindi as an official language was opposed by C.N. Annadurai, Periyar E. V. Ramasamy of DMK and C. Rajagopalachari. It led to protests in Tamil Nadu including self-inflicted deaths of some youths. Fearing the unity of the country, S.Nijalingappa, Atulya Ghosh, Sanjeeva Reddy and K. Kamaraj issued an appeal to the Central Government not to impose Hindi in non-Hindi speaking areas.
All these protests and the resignation of two Union ministors from Madras forced prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri to reconsider the Government's position and gave several assurances including that every state will have complete and unfetted freedom to continue to transact its own business in the language of its own choice, which may be the regional language or English. The use of Hindi by government is still opposed at times.
Pre-Independence
Hindi imposition in Tamil Nadu started in 1937 when the Congress Government of the Madras Presidency under C. Rajagopalachari (Rajaji) made Hindi a compulsory subject in schools. (The British were still the rulers of the Indian subcontinent at that time but elected local governments in the Provinces were installed under the British rule. Madras Presidency was a province that included much of present Tamil Nadu and parts of present Andhra Pradesh.) Tamils opposed Hindi imposition immediately and Sir A. T. Panneerselvam (the first non-brahmin barrister from Tamil Nadu) and E.V. Ramaswamy (later be known as Periyar or "the Elder one") organized anti-Hindi imposition protests in 1938. Mr. Thalamuthu and Mr. Natarajan were killed during the protests. Rajaji himself changed his attitude about Hindi, and started opposing Hindi imposition. In 1939 the Rajaji government quit and it was withdrawn in 1940.
Hindustani
About 35% to 40% of people in India speak Hindi. This Hindi includes various dialects. Under British rule, English had become the language of the administration. With partition not a possibility at that time, Nehru opted for Hindustani, an amalgam of Hindi and Urdu, to replace English. He also thought Hindustani was easy to learn due to a simpler grammer and proposed that linguists could evolve a basic Hindustani which would be easier learnt by South Indians.
Gandhi also thought that instead of English, Hindustani would unite North and South, Hindu and Muslim and Hindustani should be made the rashtrabasha (national language).
Language and Indian constitution
The spoken language in the house and the language with which the constitution to be written and the adoption of "National" language was the most controversial subject during the formulation of the Indian constitution. On 10 December 1946, in response to the Chairman of the house who reminded him of the inability of many members not to understand Hindustani, R.V. Dhulekar of United provinces said the following before Nehru persuaded him to leave the rostrum.
People who do not know Hindustani have no right to stay in India. People who are present in the House to fashion a constitution for India and do not know Hindustani are not worthy to be members of this assembly. They had better leave.
The case for Hindi to be the national language of India was bitterly opposed. T.T. Krishnamachari of Madras said,
We disliked the English language in the past. I disliked it because I was forced to learn Shakespeare and Milton, for which I had no taste at all. If we are going to be compelled to learn Hindi, I would perhaps not be able to learn it because of my age, and perhaps I would not be willing to do it because of the amount of constraint you put on me. This kind of intolerance makes us fear that the strong Centre which we need, a strong Centre which is necessary will also mean the enslavement of people who do not speak the language at the centre. I would, Sir, convey a warning on behalf of people of the South for the reason that there are already elements in South India who want separation..., and my honourable friends in U.P. do not help us in any way by flogging their idea of "Hindi Imperialism" to the maximum extent possible. So, it is up to my friends in Uttar Pradesh to have a whole India; it is up to them to have a Hindi-India. The choice is theirs.
The assembly finally arrived at a compromise. "The official language of the Union shall be Hindi in the Devanagiri script but for fifteen years from the commencement of the constitution, the English language shall continue to be used for all the official purposes of the Union for which it was being used immediately before such commencement"
Role of DMK and Annadurai
After the war with China DMK had dropped its secessionism policies. It however pledged to preserve the cultural heritage of Tamil people. In 1956, the Academy of Tamil Culture passed a resolution seeking for the continuation of English as the official language. The resolution was signed by C.N. Annadurai, Periyar E. V. Ramasamy and C.Rajagopalachari.
Annadurai was a recognised leader of DMK. In his opinion, Hindi was a regional language like any other. It had "no special merit"; in fact, it was less developed than other Indian languages and less suited in a time of rapid advances in science and technology. To the argument that more Indians spoke Hindi than other Indian language, Anna sarcastically answered,
"If we had to accept the principle of numerical superiority while selecting our national bird, the choice would have fallen not on the peacock but on the common crow".
1965 protests
The constitution of India came into existence on January 26, 1950. Enshrined in the constitution was the status of Hindi and English to be the "Official Languages" of the Central Government of India till 1965 (for a period of 15 years), after which Hindi was expected to take up the pre-eminent position as the sole "National and Official Language" of India irrespective of the state or central government. Hindi and English were the "Official Languages" in every department controlled by the Central Government, which is why Hindi and English are prominent in Railways (except the State of Tamil Nadu) and nationalised banks.
As January 26, 1965 neared, non-Hindi speakers started voicing their apprehensions openly. Between 1948 and 1961, on an average, every year close to 24% of Central Government Officials were selected from the state of Madras (present day Tamil Nadu). The next best was Uttar Pradesh with about 16%. The idea of making Hindi the sole National language was blasphemous to the students as it was combined with the complete removal of English — even as a medium of education was detrimental to their future. This would mean that the Northern regions with their Hindi proficiency would dominate the government posts and also education. Since government jobs were the most lucrative positions before 1991 liberalization, this was seen by South Indians as an indirect means to lose these jobs to natural Hindi speakers. The non-Hindi-speaking people in South India feared that they would be discriminated against in government employment and in other ways. The pro-Hindi fanatics in Jan Sangh prowled the streets of New Delhi, blackening out any English sign.. Annadurai said you can speak Tamil and English and still be a good Indian. The anti-Hindi agitations also led to the demand for creation of Dravidistan, a separate state for the speakers of Dravidian languages.
On republic day in 1965, two men from Madras set themselves on fire. One left a note saying that he did so for the cause of Tamil. Three days later, a man in Tiruchi killed himself by swallowing insecticide.
Consequences
The intensity of anti-Hindi protests created concern among the Congress leaders. On 31 January 1965, a group of leaders including S.Nijalingappa, Chief minister of Mysore, Atulya Ghosh, Bengal Congress leader, Sanjeeva Reddy, Union Minister and K. Kamaraj, the Congress president met in Bangalore and issued an appeal not to force Hindi on non-Hindi speaking areas as they believed it might endanger the unity of the country.
Congress leader Morarji Desai said that by learning Hindi, Tamil people will increase their influence in India. He regretted that Hindi was not made official before the anti-Hindi protests crystallised. He said Congress leaders in Madras should convince people there and no regional sentiments should come in the move to forge the integration of the country.
On 11 February 1965, after the resignation of two Union ministers from madras, Lal Bahadur Shastri announced in All India Radio that he would fully honour Nehru's assurances that English would be used as long as people wanted. He also gave the following assurances.
Every state will have complete and unfetted freedom to continue to transact its own business in the language of its own choice. which may be the regional language or English.
Communications between one State to another will either be in English or will be accompanied by authentic English translation.
The non-Hindi states will be free to correspond with the Central Government in English and no change will be made in this arrangement without the consent of the non-Hindi States.
In the transaction of business at the Central level English will continue to be used.
All India Civil Services examination would continue to be conducted in English rather than in Hindi alone.
See also
References
- http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=13248076 agitation against use of Hindi words on milestones in national highways
- Hindi Imposition and Independence for Tamil Nadu from India
- Jawaharlal Nehru, "The question of Language" (1937), in The unity of India: Collected writings, 1937-1940 (London:Lindsay Drummand, 1941), p241-261.
- letter to Krishnachandra, 12 May 1945,in CWMG, Vol 80, p 117.
- Ramachandra Guha, India after Gandhi, p 130
- Constitution Assembly Debates-Official Report (New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat, 1988), Volume 1, p 26-27
- Constitution Assembly Debates-Official Report (New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat, 1988), Volume 7, p235
- Ramachandra Guha, India after Gandhi, p 128-131
- Ramachandra Guha, India after Gandhi, p 393
- http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/deptts/off-lang/rule1976_eng.PDF
- Robert L. Hardgrave, Jr.(1973) The Riots in Tamilnad: Problems and Prospects of India's Language Crisis. Asian Survey. University of California Press.
- "Retreat to English". TIME. March 5, 1965. Retrieved 2007-08-30.
- Stein, Burton (1998). A History of India. Blackwell Publishing. p. 402. ISBN 0631205462.
- Ramachandra Guha, India after Gandhi, p 394
- Ramachandra Guha, India after Gandhi, p 395-396
- Ramachandra Guha. "Hindi against India". The Hindu. Retrieved 2007-08-30.
External links
| Hindi | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varieties |
| ||||||
| Language politics | |||||||
| National organizations | |||||||
| Global organizations | |||||||
| Arts | |||||||