Revision as of 00:17, 23 November 2008 editCosmic Latte (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,854 edits →Abortion, Part 2: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:20, 23 November 2008 edit undoZahd (talk | contribs)1,092 edits →Abortion, Part 2Next edit → | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
I'm not going to report or block you for a violation of ], as I've been in the thick of it myself, and that'd just be mean. Someone else might though. Come and engage on the talk page please.--] (]) 00:16, 23 November 2008 (UTC) | I'm not going to report or block you for a violation of ], as I've been in the thick of it myself, and that'd just be mean. Someone else might though. Come and engage on the talk page please.--] (]) 00:16, 23 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
I'm on the talk page, Tz. -] (]) 00:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Abortion, Part 2 == | == Abortion, Part 2 == | ||
You have repeatedly ignored friendly requests to abide by ] and other policies and guidelines. If you continue to add your own, unsourced, non-neutral opinions to pages such as ], your actions may be regarded as patently ]. Please stop. ] (]) 00:17, 23 November 2008 (UTC) | You have repeatedly ignored friendly requests to abide by ] and other policies and guidelines. If you continue to add your own, unsourced, non-neutral opinions to pages such as ], your actions may be regarded as patently ]. Please stop. ] (]) 00:17, 23 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I think youre just being a pro-choice hack, frankly. -] (]) 00:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:20, 23 November 2008
Welcome!
Hello, Zahd, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -- Longhair\ 22:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Hatnote
Hallo, I've reverted your changes because(a) they hadn't been discussed, so certainly hadn't got any consensus, and (b) I couldn't understand quite what they meant anyway. If you think something needs to be said about the case where there are two headings to distinguish, please discuss it on the article's talk page before making any changes. Thanks. PamD (talk) 07:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Allegations of apartheid
Hello,
I notice you've recreated this page as a redirect. May I ask why? It's not directly related to the Israel and the apartheid analogy article, and I think the project would be better off without the page entirely. CJCurrie (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Sola scriptura
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —David Levy 04:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Abortion
Hi, I see I'm not the only one whose reverted your edits to Abortion, and I'm afraid you may have misunderstood how things work around here. First and foremost, at Misplaced Pages we do our best to write for a neutral point of view. Misplaced Pages is descriptive, not prescriptive, we report back what people have said, we do not try to write what is true in some grander sense, but little truths. Thus, we do our best to avoid editorializing, soap boxing, or otherwise sharing our own opinions about anything, such as say... abortion. It doesn't matter if we're Right, it matters whether it is relevant, verifiable, and neutral. I highly recommend you review the Misplaced Pages policies link on this page above, and may I suggest that you try editing a contentious subject where you feel neutral. ϢereSpielChequers 08:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Soul
As you may have noticed, I have reverted your recent changes to Soul. The problem lies specifically with "It is the human mind itself, as made by God to be in his image." Asserting this in the lead does not conform with the neutral point of view policy though you may like to work on the "Religious views" section. The sentence of transcendence of the soul, while possibly less controversial, also couldn't be allowed as it was as it is not a universally held view. Good luck with editing Misplaced Pages. --WikiSlasher (talk) 14:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Reproductive rights
Hi, I undid your addition of "Because the concept of "reproductive rights" often refers to the controversial practice of abortion, the term and concept of such "rights" are themselves extremely controversial." to the intro because it is unreferenced. In the last month a number of editors have spend a lot of time making sure that all statements in the article are referenced. Your statement is not and hence should not be in the article like that. Please add a reference. Ta --SasiSasi (talk) 23:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
FYI
I'm not going to report or block you for a violation of the three revert rule, as I've been in the thick of it myself, and that'd just be mean. Someone else might though. Come and engage on the talk page please.--Tznkai (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm on the talk page, Tz. -Zahd (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Abortion, Part 2
You have repeatedly ignored friendly requests to abide by WP:NPOV and other policies and guidelines. If you continue to add your own, unsourced, non-neutral opinions to pages such as Abortion, your actions may be regarded as patently disruptive. Please stop. Cosmic Latte (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think youre just being a pro-choice hack, frankly. -Zahd (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)