User talk:EagleScout18: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:49, 3 December 2008 editEagleScout18 (talk \| contribs)243 edits remove vandalism← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:55, 3 December 2008 edit undoScjessey (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,029 edits restore legitimate warning, add probation noticeNext edit →
Line 54:		Line 54:

	Thank you, I'm trying to fix the articles. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do. ] (]) 23:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)		Thank you, I'm trying to fix the articles. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do. ] (]) 23:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

			== December 2008 ==
			] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without ] a ]{{#if:Public image of Barack Obama\|, as you did to ],}} is not consistent with our policy of ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with ], please take this opportunity to add references to the article. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ''WorldNetDaily is not a ]. It is a conservative opinion site.'' ] (]) 02:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

			] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:\| according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->-] </sup>]] 02:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

			===Reliable sources===
			Conservative spin sites, conservative blogs and YouTube are not ]. This article is a child article of ], and falls under the auspices of both ] and ]. Only sources of the highest quality are acceptable, and these do not meet that standard. -- ] (]) 02:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

			:I disagree, and believe that a consensus of more than one is in order. ] (]) 02:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

			===Probation notice===
			] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed{{#if:Public image of Barack Obama\|, ],}} is on ]. {{#if:Talk:Barack Obama/Article probation\|A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at ].\|}} {{#if:\|{{{3}}}\|Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''}}<!-- Template:uw-probation --> -- ] (]) 02:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:55, 3 December 2008

~~== November 2008 ==~~

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Ralph Nader presidential campaign, 2008 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II 00:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Please provide example of "Non-constructive." Thank you. EagleScout18 (talk) 00:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

My First "Help Me"

{{help me}}

There appears to be a problem according to the above user. I am removing his original research--- it also appears he is operating with two handles, a name and an IP address. He also appears to be engaging in edit warring. Please advise how to proceed. Thank you. EagleScout18 (talk) 01:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Reverting in good faith something that appears to be vandalism is not edit-warring. There is no requirement for users to log in to edit. The best places to handle your questions are at his talk page (to ask, politely, about his reasons), and at the article talk page to discuss whether or not those figures are original research. 01:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I have done this, politely. Also, please note that while not logging in is permissible, not logging in to build the appearance of consensus, or to dodge 3RR rule, is. Reverting correct figures is vandalism, which this user has done. Reverting sourced information is vandalism, which this user has also done. To add, he is violating Misplaced Pages: No original research. I have posted information that this user disagrees with, which is clearly NOT vandalism. If it continues, I will have no choice but to take it to the notice boards. EagleScout18 (talk)

It looks like what that user did was not vandalism. Please don't start drama. If you wish to improve an article, please take it to the article's talk page. - Jameson L. Tai 01:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Dropped by to say sorry about the edit conflicts earlier on that Ralph Nader Page. Huggle said it was un constructive, and the vandals kept rising.. So I mistakened you for a vandal. Sorry. II MusLiM HyBRiD II 02:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

And one more thing, asking someone else for something which I did wrong, is okay... But Being so dramatic about it and "bringing it to the noticeboards" is something more un civil-ish. I wouldnt do that If I we're you, And Im Sure neither would others... So try calming down. Thanks. II MusLiM HyBRiD II 02:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

I mean if youre gonna report be to ANI ,okay, but it just doesnt sound right. :S II MusLiM HyBRiD II 02:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

No Problem II MusLiM HyBRiD II 02:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Faith, Restored

If there was a mench award, it would go to II MusLiM HyBRiD II . It takes a big person to do what he did today. Cheers, EagleScout18 (talk) 02:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Lol thanks. Now if you dont mind me asking, whats a mench? Lol, Im only 13, and Im kinda slow, Lol. ^_^ Cheers! II MusLiM HyBRiD II 03:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

LOL that's funny! Okay, a mench is Yiddish for a very VERY good person, "a human being, upright, honorable, decent person, someone to admire"! Hey, we should create the WP article... :) EagleScout18 (talk) 03:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh I see. Never was good at yiddish. And yep, we should.II MusLiM HyBRiD II 03:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

)... cool, next project. And I've got to work on my user page, too, when I get myself together :≈O

Anyways, Im gonna go now. Get some sleep 10:30 pm here in new york. :S Take care! ^^II MusLiM HyBRiD II 03:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Take good care, II MusLiM HyBRiD II , enjoy your zzzzzzzzzsss :) EagleScout18 (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Ralph Nader articles

No problem, so far it's been a pleasure. :) Regards. FangedFaerie (Talk | Edits) 03:32, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

You rock :) EagleScout18 (talk) 01:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm just a little worried about hitting it too hard. One edit involves counting the number of times the term was used, another leads the paragraph with Nader used the term Uncle Tom. I don't like either, because they skirt WP:OR and add commentary. I really think the best thing to do with this, given WP:BLP, is to report the bare bones facts given by the sources. Regards. FangedFaerie (Talk | Edits) 19:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Request granted

I reported him as a suspected Sock Puppet and requested a new Check User on his IP. BillyTFried (talk) 23:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm trying to fix the articles. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do. EagleScout18 (talk) 23:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Public image of Barack Obama, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Misplaced Pages:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WorldNetDaily is not a reliable source. It is a conservative opinion site. Scjessey (talk) 02:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -Andrew c 02:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Conservative spin sites, conservative blogs and YouTube are not reliable sources. This article is a child article of Barack Obama, and falls under the auspices of both WP:BLP and article probation. Only sources of the highest quality are acceptable, and these do not meet that standard. -- Scjessey (talk) 02:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

I disagree, and believe that a consensus of more than one is in order. EagleScout18 (talk) 02:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Probation notice

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Public image of Barack Obama, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Barack Obama/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- Scjessey (talk) 02:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)