| Revision as of 22:48, 8 December 2008 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →User:Imunchies!: Keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:51, 8 December 2008 edit undoNeurolysis (talk | contribs)27,885 edits →User:Imunchies!: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| *'''Keep''' I think this is just a very lost new editor. In the grand scheme of things, the user page isn't that big of a deal. -- ] (]) 22:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' I think this is just a very lost new editor. In the grand scheme of things, the user page isn't that big of a deal. -- ] (]) 22:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| **However, if we apply the 'it doesn't hurt' rationale to every page, then Wiki overflows with extraneous waffle. I'm not saying what you are saying isn't true, I just don't think that such a page is salvageable, or even if the owner is ''willing'' to salvage it. <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>— ]</b><sup><i>]</i></sup></font> 22:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:51, 8 December 2008
User:Imunchies!
WP:NOT#MYSPACE. I usually wouldn't nom, but notice that this user clearly will continue - "Wiki is a social site", "Jew (you maybe?) is so evil" — neuro 22:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I think this is just a very lost new editor. In the grand scheme of things, the user page isn't that big of a deal. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- However, if we apply the 'it doesn't hurt' rationale to every page, then Wiki overflows with extraneous waffle. I'm not saying what you are saying isn't true, I just don't think that such a page is salvageable, or even if the owner is willing to salvage it. — neuro 22:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)