| Revision as of 20:16, 12 December 2008 editRichardWeiss (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users75,870 edits comm new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:18, 12 December 2008 edit undoQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits →Sanger: Hmm...Next edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ==Sanger== | ==Sanger== | ||
| I am unhappy to have Sanger mentioned int he opening of Wales' article, he doesn't have enough notability in Wales' life to justify this. Thanks, ] 20:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | I am unhappy to have Sanger mentioned int he opening of Wales' article, he doesn't have enough notability in Wales' life to justify this. Thanks, ] 20:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :But you are happy with mentioning in the lead of the Larry Sanger article. Why? ] 20:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:18, 12 December 2008
JtP RFC
You may be interested in this Talk:Joe_the_Plumber#RFC:_Career_and_LicesningMattnad (talk) 20:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Back
Back from outer space and going editing Larry Sanger to end the contraversy once and for all--Trulexicon (talk) 05:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC) (I'll just sign with my username)
- Its not an OR...Assistant Founder is a prefectly good word to describe Mr. Sanger's job
- by the way my use of "reared" was in Jest...I fully understood what the terms as in "rearing an animal"--Trulexicon (talk) 05:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC) (I was kinda sorta trying to call him this)
- Its not OR though; the artcile says he assisted with founded of Misplaced Pages hence asst. founder..--Trulexicon (talk) 05:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- See here http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Larry_Sanger#OR--Trulexicon (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Minor edits tend to be a funny thing...they're subjectivity...I'm sure Tolstoy might have thought some his works as "minor"--Trulexicon (talk) 05:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- See here http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Larry_Sanger#OR--Trulexicon (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
About NPOV (in my talk)...--Trulexicon (talk) 05:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Sanger
I am unhappy to have Sanger mentioned int he opening of Wales' article, he doesn't have enough notability in Wales' life to justify this. Thanks, SqueakBox 20:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- But you are happy with mentioning Jimmy Wales in the lead of the Larry Sanger article. Why? QuackGuru 20:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)