| Revision as of 15:10, 15 October 2005 editFred Bauder (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,115 edits setup | Revision as of 20:40, 17 October 2005 edit undoRobert McClenon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers197,249 edits →Proposed findings of fact: more proposed findings of factNext edit → | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| :Comment by others: | :Comment by others: | ||
| :# | :# | ||
| ===Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia=== | |||
| Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia is a compendium of knowledge. | |||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by parties: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by others: | |||
| :# | |||
| ===Judgment by editors in encyclopedias=== | |||
| In the development of an encyclopedia, decisions as to what material is appropriate for inclusion in any particular article within the encyclopedia requires judgment by the editors. | |||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by parties: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by others: | |||
| ===Consensus=== | |||
| It is the policy of Misplaced Pages that issues as to content should normally be determined by editorial consensus. Although one dictionary definition of consensus is unanimous agreement, that is not the usage of the term in Misplaced Pages. Consensus has never been understood in Misplaced Pages to mandate unanimous agreement. | |||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by parties: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by others: | |||
| ===No personal attacks=== | |||
| Personal attacks by editors against other editors are not permitted in Misplaced Pages. Insulting or hostile edit summaries may be personal attacks. | |||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by parties: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by others: | |||
| ===Vandalism=== | |||
| Unwarranted allegations of vandalism are personal attacks. Deletion of material that is the subject of a content dispute as to relevance is not vandalism. | |||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by parties: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by others: | |||
| ===Sockpuppets=== | |||
| The use of ], while not normally prohibited, is discouraged. The use of sockpuppets to create the appearance of consensus is strongly discouraged. | |||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by parties: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by others: | |||
| ===Gaming the system=== | |||
| The use of ] to "game the system" to evade Misplaced Pages policy, such as the 3RR rule, is not permitted. | |||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by parties: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by others: | |||
| == Proposed findings of fact == | == Proposed findings of fact == | ||
| Line 51: | Line 129: | ||
| ===Template=== | ===Template=== | ||
| 1) {text of proposed finding of fact} | 1) {text of proposed finding of fact} | ||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by parties: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by others: | |||
| :# | |||
| ===Multiple anonymous IP addresses=== | |||
| During content disputes concerning the ] and ] articles, multiple anonymous IP addresses were used, many of which had no edit history except with respect to the articles in question. | |||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by parties: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by others: | |||
| :# | |||
| ===Personal attacks=== | |||
| During content disputes concerning the ] and ] articles, there was a pattern of personal attacks on talk pages and in edit summaries by anonymous editors. | |||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by parties: | |||
| :# | |||
| :Comment by others: | |||
| :# | |||
| ===Evading 3RR=== | |||
| During content disputes concerning the ] and ] articles, the ArbCom finds that there was a pattern of the use of multiple anonymous IP addresses to evade the 3RR rule. | |||
| :Comment by Arbitrators: | :Comment by Arbitrators: | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 17 October 2005
This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of /Evidence here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies, Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on /Proposed decision.
Motions and requests by the parties
Template
1)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed temporary injunctions
Template
1)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed final decision
Proposed principles
Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia
Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia is a compendium of knowledge.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Judgment by editors in encyclopedias
In the development of an encyclopedia, decisions as to what material is appropriate for inclusion in any particular article within the encyclopedia requires judgment by the editors.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Consensus
It is the policy of Misplaced Pages that issues as to content should normally be determined by editorial consensus. Although one dictionary definition of consensus is unanimous agreement, that is not the usage of the term in Misplaced Pages. Consensus has never been understood in Misplaced Pages to mandate unanimous agreement.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
No personal attacks
Personal attacks by editors against other editors are not permitted in Misplaced Pages. Insulting or hostile edit summaries may be personal attacks.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Vandalism
Unwarranted allegations of vandalism are personal attacks. Deletion of material that is the subject of a content dispute as to relevance is not vandalism.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Sockpuppets
The use of sockpuppets, while not normally prohibited, is discouraged. The use of sockpuppets to create the appearance of consensus is strongly discouraged.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Gaming the system
The use of sockpuppets to "game the system" to evade Misplaced Pages policy, such as the 3RR rule, is not permitted.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed findings of fact
Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Multiple anonymous IP addresses
During content disputes concerning the Ted Kennedy and Rosemary Kennedy articles, multiple anonymous IP addresses were used, many of which had no edit history except with respect to the articles in question.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Personal attacks
During content disputes concerning the Ted Kennedy and Rosemary Kennedy articles, there was a pattern of personal attacks on talk pages and in edit summaries by anonymous editors.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Evading 3RR
During content disputes concerning the Ted Kennedy and Rosemary Kennedy articles, the ArbCom finds that there was a pattern of the use of multiple anonymous IP addresses to evade the 3RR rule.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed enforcement
Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Analysis of evidence
Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
General discussion
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others: