| Revision as of 16:51, 13 December 2008 editCaulde (talk | contribs)21,354 edits c← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:54, 13 December 2008 edit undoSam Blacketer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers25,217 edits →Blocked for incivility: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| : Chill, please? You do know that Theresa is an ex-arb, right? a just in case. Cheers, ] 16:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | : Chill, please? You do know that Theresa is an ex-arb, right? a just in case. Cheers, ] 16:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :: Do you want me to protect this page to stop more comments? ] 16:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | :: Do you want me to protect this page to stop more comments? ] 16:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Blocked for incivility == | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:72 hours|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''|You have been '''temporarily ]''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:incivility, in violation of ]|'''incivility, in violation of ]'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:|] (]) 18:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> | |||
| While finding yourself as collateral damage in an autoblock is not a nice situation, you are still expected to ]. Instead you the administrator who had placed the block, absent any evidence that she could reasonably have forseen collateral damage. followed. While Teresa Knott should have obtained the consent of this Committee before blocking you, I find that her failure to do so was accidental and so her situation differs from that of SlimVirgin. | |||
| After Teresa's block was undone, you in further violation of civility restrictions, and further including without justification assuming that her block was "trolled". I note that you are quick to personal attacks on yourself; someone who knows what a personal attack on themselves is can be expected to know when they are making a personal attack on another user. | |||
| In accordance with ], the block was debated on the Arbitrator's mailing list and endorsed by a majority of the committee. The initial proposal of one week was moderated to 72 hours. Supporting arbitrators were Charles Matthews, Deskana, Fayssal F., FT2, Jpgordon, Kirill Lokshin, and myself. No arbitrator opposed. The following arbitrators did not express an opinion, or were away at the time of the debate: FloNight, Jdforrester, Morven, Newyorkbrad, Stephen Bain, YellowMonkey. | |||
| To verify the agreement of the committee please see from Arbcom-l and the preceding thread (former arbitrators with access to the list may wish to give independent confirmation of the committee's consent). I suggest that any appeal be directed to the committee. ] (]) 18:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:54, 13 December 2008
Had enough of the bloody place - gone. Giano (talk) 16:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ya don't seem the type, to pack'er in. Hope ya change your mind. GoodDay (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Chill, please? You do know that Theresa is an ex-arb, right? a just in case. Cheers, Jack Merridew 16:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Do you want me to protect this page to stop more comments? Caulde 16:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Blocked for incivility
While finding yourself as collateral damage in an autoblock is not a nice situation, you are still expected to assume good faith. Instead you attacked the administrator who had placed the block, absent any evidence that she could reasonably have forseen collateral damage. Further personal attacks followed. While Teresa Knott should have obtained the consent of this Committee before blocking you, I find that her failure to do so was accidental and so her situation differs from that of SlimVirgin.
After Teresa's block was undone, you went after her in further violation of civility restrictions, and further attacked Elonka including without justification assuming that her block was "trolled". I note that you are quick to detect personal attacks on yourself; someone who knows what a personal attack on themselves is can be expected to know when they are making a personal attack on another user.
In accordance with the motion concerning enforcement, the block was debated on the Arbitrator's mailing list and endorsed by a majority of the committee. The initial proposal of one week was moderated to 72 hours. Supporting arbitrators were Charles Matthews, Deskana, Fayssal F., FT2, Jpgordon, Kirill Lokshin, and myself. No arbitrator opposed. The following arbitrators did not express an opinion, or were away at the time of the debate: FloNight, Jdforrester, Morven, Newyorkbrad, Stephen Bain, YellowMonkey.
To verify the agreement of the committee please see this email from Arbcom-l and the preceding thread (former arbitrators with access to the list may wish to give independent confirmation of the committee's consent). I suggest that any appeal be directed to the committee. Sam Blacketer (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC)