Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:27, 1 January 2009 editCbl62 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators244,828 edits Carabane← Previous edit Revision as of 19:34, 1 January 2009 edit undoJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,458 editsm Robert Eric Wone: tweak punctuationNext edit →
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 346: Line 346:
===Articles created/expanded on December 31=== ===Articles created/expanded on December 31===


====]====
{{DYKsuggestion<!--Please do not copy this code directly for nominating. Instead, use {{subst:DYKsug}} as described in the header.-->
| hook = ... that prospective ] ] called murder victim ] "a kind and gentle man" who was "killed in the most horrible of ways"?
| creator = Bachcell
| creator2 =
| creator3 =
| creator4 =
| expander =
| expander2 =
| expander3 =
| nominator = Jclemens
| comment = Article is currently at AfD, which will likely be closed as keep (based on current trends) before this hook would run. However, it may be renamed to ] in the process. Bachcell wrote the initial article, but I've actually done the majority of the editing on it as of now. :-)
| image =
| credits =
*{{DYKmake|Robert Eric Wone|Jclemens}}
}} at 19:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
:*
{{-}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line.-->


====]==== ====]====

Revision as of 19:34, 1 January 2009

Template:Active editnotice

Limia tridens maleLimia tridens male

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Instructions

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main PageT:DYK
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules
Unofficial criteria: LaPella's unwritten rules
  • DYK evaluation includes:
  • Length - The Article should contain at least 1,500 characters in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles having more than 1,500 characters of prose still may be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
  • Verification - The DYK hook fact in the article needs an inline cite at the end of the sentence and the article in general should use inline, cited sources.
  • Date - The new article should be no more than five days old and the expanded article should be expanded at least fivefold with new text within the last five days.
  • Length
  • DYK qualifying characters: To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. For Mac users, Apple has a Word counter widget available for Mac OS X 10.4 or later. Note: The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.
  • Lists: Proposed lists need 1,500+ characters of prose text. The listed items themselves are not counted as part the the 1,500 DYK qualifying characters
  • Verification
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    1. interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    2. short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    3. neutral,
    4. definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    5. always cited in the article with an inline citation.
  • Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit, not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Other issues
  • Pictures: Pictures accompanying the DYK hook should be:
    1. freely licensed suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely licensed pictures;
    2. suitable, attractive, and interesting at a 100x100px-wide resolution;
    3. already in the article; and
    4. relevant to the article.
  • Sounds: Sounds accompanying the DYK hook should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}

Sample DYK suggestion strings

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below:

{{subst:DYKsug
 | article   = Example
 | hook      = ... that this ] is an ''']''' ''(pictured)''?
 | creator   = Jimbo Wales
 | expander  = 
 | nominator =
 | image     = Example.png
 | comment   =
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|January 9}} Thanks, ~~~~

Symbols

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires some additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem}} on the user's talk page, in case they do not notice if there is an issue.

Current status

DYK queue status

There are currently 5 filled queues. Humans, please consider promoting a prep to queue if you have the time!

Earliest time for next DYK update: 00:00, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Current time: 16:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Update frequency: once every 12 hours

Last updated: 4 hours ago( )

The next update will be produced from queue 3.

There are five queues;

Count of DYK Hooks
Section # of Hooks # Verified
November 1 1 1
November 2 1
November 15 1
November 17 1
November 18 1
November 19 2
November 21 2 1
November 22 2
November 26 1
December 1 2
December 2 3 1
December 3
December 5 1 1
December 6 1
December 10 2
December 11 2
December 12 2
December 13 4 1
December 14 1 1
December 15 2
December 16 2
December 17 3 3
December 18 3 1
December 19 7 7
December 20 8 7
December 21 5 4
December 22 5 2
December 23 11 11
December 24 5 4
December 25 6 3
December 26 9 5
December 27 5 4
December 28 12 8
December 29 6 4
December 30 12 9
December 31 12 8
January 1 13 8
January 2 20 8
January 3 11 8
January 4 14 7
January 5 15 7
January 6 17 7
January 7 8 4
January 8 8
January 9 3
Total 252 135
Last updated 16:28, 9 January 2025 UTC
Current time is 16:55, 9 January 2025 UTC

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Misplaced Pages:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings at the bottom of this page.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on January 1

Brough Superior SS80

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 17:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Texas Hold 'Em Poker (video game)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Darleen Ortega

Template:DYKsuggestion at 12:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Hershey Creamery Company

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

2008 Music City Bowl

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:16, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

The Dark Defender

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

HMAS Jeparit

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Moronko

Template:DYKsuggestion.

William Phelps (colonist)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Quantitative Precipitation Forecast

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

St. Augustine in the American Civil War

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

This took place on January 7, 1861, so January 7 would make the best date for this to be featured.--Gen. Bedford 03:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Barry Foote

Template:DYKsuggestion. — RyanCross (talk) 02:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

List of Dallas Stars head coaches

There are better hooks available, if a bit of research is done to add a few sentences and references to this article. For example, general manager Bob Gainey fired himself as head coach in 1996. See here and here and here and here and here. - Dravecky (talk) 13:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Kelly Paris

Template:DYKsuggestion. First nomination of the year for DYK! :-) — RyanCross (talk) 00:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Jerzy Putrament

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:39, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 31

Robert Eric Wone

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Rufus T. Bush

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Washington Park Subdivision

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

David Logan (Oregon politician)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Iminoglycinuria

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


1941 Florida hurricane

Artes (magazine)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

The Green Bible

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Charles Bennett Ray

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


M47 bomb

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Carl Fredriksens Transport

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


In and Out scandal

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Sure it is, ref 12. I've added another too. Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

All Women Shortlists

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


1963 Benin coup d'état

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:20, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Shouldn't this be 1963 Dahomey coup d'état instead? There was no country called "Benin" till 1975. --74.13.129.148 (talk) 14:08, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Suvi Raj Grubb

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Lowfield Heath, St Michael and All Angels Church, Lowfield Heath

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Carl Fredrik Wisløff

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Gillender Building

Charles H. Black

Walter L. Dodge House

Template:DYKsuggestion Cbl62 (talk) 07:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Gao Ying

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Playnormous

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Sierra Highway

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 30

Marble Mountain Wilderness

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:40, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Djibouti Francolin

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


1933 Treasure Coast hurricane

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Cullen Performance Hall

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Battle of Same

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Montana State Prison

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Kamianets-Podilskyi Castle

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

  • An interesting article, but unfortunately completely ineligible for DYK. This is not a new article; in fact, the initial version of the article is dated February 2008. On Dec 31, 2008 the article had a slight extension, but it was far less than a fivefold expansion (not even two-fold) compared with its previous version, dated Dec 13, 2008. Sorry, but completely ineligible for DYK according to WP:DYK#DYK rules. Nsk92 (talk) 04:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Please look at the full history log of the article. The article was initially created in mainspace on February 27, 2008 and was gradually expanded in mainspace over the next 9 months. Here is the diff comparing the current version with the version of December 13, 2008. The fact that the revision provided in your diff was prepared in user space does not make this a new article (because a previous version of the article already existed in mainspace), nor does it make it a 5x+ expansion compared with the previous operative version of December 13, 2008. Nsk92 (talk) 05:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Oops, I take it back. I see that the article was moved from userspace into mainspace using an actual pagemove rather than traditional paste-in, so the history log portion I was looking at actually referred to the time when it was still a user subpage. So it does qualify as a new article. Nsk92 (talk) 05:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Hmmm, now I am really confused. I don't see anything relevant in the move log but I do see a creation of a brand new manual redirect from a user subpage to the mainspace article on Dec 31. Could someone else please take a look at this and try to figure out what exactly is going on? Nsk92 (talk) 05:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
I thought this is the move log, which shows a move, and therefore I thought the article's previous version couldn't have existed in main space or it would have prevented the move. A move automatically creates a redirect from the "from" page to the "to" page. But others are certainly welcome to look. Art LaPella (talk) 06:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I think you are right. I was looking for the record of this move by clicking on "View logs for this page" in the history page of the article itself, but for some reason the move does not show up there. However, it does show in the log section for the Sandbox page, as you pointed out. So it seems that everything is Ok with the date of the article after all and that it was created in mainspace on Dec 31, 2008 and so the article is DYK eligible as a new article. Nsk92 (talk) 06:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Tualatin Valley Junior Academy

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKalt

Caitlin Sanchez

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Date, length, and verification all accounted for. However, the article has currently been prodded for deletion. Until this deletion issue is resolved, the DYK nom shouldn't pass. Terrakyte (talk) 03:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

General Instrument CP1600

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

IR-40

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

A Life of Her Own

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Looks good. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • WTH is the "Breen office"? Do we have a relevant link; otherwise it should be explained?

Siege of Constantinople (1203), Siege of Constantinople (1204) and Siege of Constantinople (1235)

:* Unfortunately, all of the articles are older than 5 days, and none have been expanded 5x in the last 5 days. Unless 5x expansion occurs, none of the articles can pass. Terrakyte (talk) 16:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Jean-Baptiste Hachème

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Willie McCartney

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


FN-6

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


White-faced Heron

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Yanna McIntosh

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Rob MacCachren

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


Alexander John Scott

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

List of Canadian Idol finalists

Articles created/expanded on December 29

Polyamino carboxylic acid

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:23, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


John L. Stevens

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

This is not a fivefold expansion since December 28, unless we move it to December 20. Please see #Instructions for details, and maybe "Unwritten" Rule D8. By the way, the article should be linked from the hook, something like: "... that John L. Stevens, a former Universalist pastor, ... " Art LaPella (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
OK... so ALT1 becomes: ... that John L. Stevens, a former Universalist pastor, helped stage a coup in the Kingdom of Hawai'i to overthrow Queen Lili'uokalani in 1893?
In regards to sticking strictly to the rules: this is my first DYK so I would ask your indulgence in "helping the newbie." Should I just move it to December 20th? What is the best thing to do at this point? Thanks, Noah 04:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
That's an unwritten precedent rather than a rule, and I invite comments from others, but since time is running out, yes I would move it to December 20, although that was 10 days ago. Art LaPella (talk) 05:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Well, moving it to the 20th is probably equivalent to removing this entry as a candidate. So, I would simply say if someone feels like making a minor exception to the guidelines they can approve it as is. It seems to me a fair proposal especially given that MaramadukePercy did the expansion in two stages, with a 3.5x expansion on the 29th. Do what you will. :-) Happy new year, Noah 20:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Kangirsuk, Quebec

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


Arnold Jacob Wolf

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Date and length OK, on-line ref verified. At 200 characters the hook was at the maximal allowed length, I shortened it by about 5 characters, just in case. Nsk92 (talk) 04:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Rugby-Bundesliga 2007-08

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm planning to but it will have to wait a week or two the least, sadly, no time right now. The hook could be used then if not good enough now. EA210269 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Hal Fryar

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Or ALT2 ... that Hal Fryar received a number of complaints from English teachers because he appeared in a movie with the grammatically incorrect title The Outlaws Is Coming? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 09:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Kelley Point Park

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:12, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Roland Harper

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Gil Dodds (athlete)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


Alvah Chapman, Jr.

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


Paul Boucherot

  • for the convenience of reviewers the ref is available online here.

Fritz Otto Bernert

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Thimpu principles

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

ALT 1... that the Thimpu principles were put forward by Sri Lankan Tamil delegates at Thimpu, Bhutan? Taprobanus (talk) 04:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Bryan Lobb

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Scottish Six Days Trial

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 21:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Operation Parthenon, Operation Boris, Operation Finery, Operation Shed, Plan Giralda


MC-1 bomb

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

  • That image is weird, surely there is a better one somewhere, I will keep my eyes open for one. An alt follows.
  • ALT1: ... that although the U.S. MC-1 chemical bomb was designed to fit the F-4 Phantom II, it could not fit that plane's successor, the F-16?

Battle of Suez

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:19, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Averill Park Central School District

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 28

Joshua L. Liebman

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Harlan Estate

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Fishing industry in the United States

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Teletubbies say Eh-oh!

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Before Colonel Warden started his expansion of the article on December 30, the article contained 546 characters of prose. Atm, it contains 2132, which is not a 5x expansion. The article needs to get to 2730 characters, at least, before this DYK nom can pass. Terrakyte (talk) 03:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Turkish Airlines Flight 634

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Tea leaf paradox

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

This is a great article! Simple, clear, and really quite interesting. Maury Markowitz (talk) 02:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Suggest ALT due to wording: ... that in 1926, Albert Einstein solved the tea leaf paradox, which states that if the tea in a teacup is stirred, the tea leaves will collect in the middle rather than at the edges?
I like it! --Apoc2400 (talk) 11:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Also, I don't really understand what the term "middle of the bottom" means. The leaves are still on the top of the tea (drink); does "bottom" refer to bottom of the meniscus? This wording appears numerous times in the article and each time it's not really explained. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talk 05:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The leaves are on the bottom, below the drink. They are heavier than water, especially when soaked. I will see if I can make that more clear in the article. --Apoc2400 (talk) 11:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Very nice! Can we do away with the second person language though? Dabomb87 (talk) 18:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Just got rid of 2nd person reference. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talk 18:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
I just rewrote the article's introduction to be clearer and more concise. I reworded some things in the explanation and fixed some grammatical errors in the explanation as well. It's in a bit better shape now. Nice job on the referencing tho - if only everyone was so thorough... ~ ωαdεstεr16«talk 19:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you! Misplaced Pages is great in that way. There is always someone there to fix the mistakes. I may have put a bit too many references, but better that than too few. --Apoc2400 (talk) 22:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

June Buchanan

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:54, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


Amanitore

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

List of NFL teams with multiple 1000 yard rushers

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

  • New article, date and hook ref verified. The picture doesn't cut it as it doesn't really illustrate the article hook (it doesn't have a lot to do with the article either). But otherwise looks good. Thanks for adding an interesting article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure the picture doesn't illustrate the hook or the article - there are 10 players in NFL history who have been parts of 1000 yard rushing tandems, and the picture is of one of them, and the most recent, and one of the two that are part of the most recent tandem referred to in the hook. That said, if the picture is not appropriate to use for the DYK, that is fine with me. Rlendog (talk) 06:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the compliment on the article, by the way. I was actually surprised this list didn't already exist. Then when I started writing it, I found that the history was more interesting than I originally expected. Rlendog (talk) 06:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Picón Bejes-Tresviso

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The revised hook is fine now, but there are two other problems: the hook fact has no inline citations in the article, and the article makes no mention of "human foot odour". --Bruce1ee 13:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

E61 anthrax bomblet

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Du You

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


Trois petites Liturgies de la Présence Divine

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Richard Martin (Lord Mayor of London), Richard Martin (Recorder of London)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

E23 munition

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • This alternate hook depends upon which hook is used for another of my suggestions below, the E14 munition. If the alternate about that munition being made of cardboard is used, then this one, obviously, should not be used, so make sure you check the archives before using this one. --IvoShandor (talk) 21:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Stability constants of complexes

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Wild Oats XI

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Biscuit sex

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:13, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Sorry, but I am un-ticking this entry. IMO, the hook does ont satisfy one of the key official DYK rules:"Articles and hooks which focus on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided." A hook about somebody's loss of sexual potency due to overeating on biscuits, given in the context of a post-divorce squabble, certainly qualifies as negative. I suggest that the nominator proposes a different hook for this article, without these BLP problems. Nsk92 (talk) 20:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I can re-change the hook if you want – but it needs to be pointed out that (as mentioned in the article) this claim pre-dates their divorce by some months (and thus is not part of "a post-divorce squabble"), is a direct quote from Madonna, sourced in the article to two reliable sources (the Daily Mail and the Fox News website) with (literally) hundreds more sources out there (I used these two to give a wide geographical spread), and at no point was denied by either party. How about "…that in 2002 McVitie's provided almost half a million biscuits free to women attending Ann Summers parties?" or "…that the design of a 1970s Huntley & Palmers biscuit tin depicting a garden party was rejected by Tesco as it included a couple having sex and two dogs copulating in the flowerbed?"? – iridescent 20:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Re your first point, I am not questioning the fact that the statement in the initial hook is actually supported by reliable sources. But DYK rules regarding DYK hooks are more stringent than the general WP:BLP rules and specify that any hooks that focus on negative aspects of living persons (even if properly sourced) should be avoided. Regarding your other two suggestions. The second one (regarding the Huntley & Palmers biscuit design) really pushes the boundaries of good taste, in my opinion, which is also undesirable under the general DYK neutrality rules (which are also more stringent than WP:NPOV). The one about McVitie's might work, although it needs to be properly formated as a suggested hook, with a link to the nominated article being bolded. Nsk92 (talk) 21:09, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I like the last hook. It don't think it's distasteful. It's simply stating fact. I can understand the BLP issues, but it's not distasteful to mention that a company rejected an ad that was, perhaps, distasteful. However, I think the image is inappropriate for the main page and it's not relevant to any presented hook, so I've removed it from the template here. لennavecia 21:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I disagree re last hook but, more to the point, after re-reading the entire article more carefully I am much inclined to axe it as a DYK candidate altogether. Perhaps some other DYK regulars can chime in here, since I am a relative newcomer myself. The article seems to me to be a good AfD candidate as the topic appears to be artificially created by assembling several disjointed references and seems, in my opinion not to exist as a coherent topic discussed as such by reliable sources. In the references given I don't really see any of the sources discussing the connection between sex and biscuits as a coherent subject. For example, the Madonna-Guy Ritchie episode does not even seem to fall into the scope of the article as it is defined in the article's opening paragraph. Madonna claimed that Ritchie was trying to lose weight on a "cookie diet" and that the loss of sex drive was one of the side-effects. That does not really correspond well to the article's stated subject: "human sexual behavior involving biscuits or cookies, to pornographic material involving biscuits and cookies, or to the use of biscuits and cookies as a medium for the production and distribution of pornography". The McVitie's story also seems like rather a stretch. A careful reading of the reference provided there shows that McVitie's justified its partnership decision with Ann Summers by demographic marketing considerations ("new cookies are aimed at the same target market - women aged 20-45") rather than by asserting a special connection between biscuits and sex. The ref given for the Mondongo story also appears to say that Mondongo's choice of buscuits as a medium for making a series of pornographic images was motivated by other considerations and not by asserting some kind of a special link between buscuits and sex. The ref says: "Things stink and no wonder Mondongo has even thought of making a work from out their own faeces. They didn’t, they chose biscuits, this time, equally heinous since they are what the wives of the military would have nibbled on at tea-time as they told stories to their ‘adopted’ children." Again, I don't really see in any of these references a specific discussion of relationship between sex and biscuits as a coherent subject. Overall, the entire subject of the article seems to be an artificially created one to me. Nsk92 (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Franks Hall

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Done! Mjroots (talk) 18:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

La Nativité du Seigneur

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:57, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Heathkit H8

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • There is only one reference in the article (which is not even an in-line citation at that), to a website that may or may not pass WP:RS. In any event, notability of the subject is not established and would need to be demonstrated first by references to multiple independent reliable sources. The article cannot go to the main page in its current form. Nsk92 (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I don't think it's neccesary for an article to be perfect to be on the front page, but since not even the hook has a citation in the article, this one clearly doesn't qualify. It doesn't meet the rules for DYK selection. - Mgm| 16:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Please re-evaluate. A work in progress progresses. Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:43, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Note: These reviews were made while I was still editing (I wanted to DYK it before I forgot). I have addressed these issues (in spades) so I would like to get this re-accessed. I've left notes on their talk pages. Is there anything else I should do? Maury Markowitz (talk) 02:06, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

  • There are some references in the article now, but the entry still does not satisfy the DYK requirements. First, according to the official DYK rules, there must be a sentence in the article, with an in-line citation in that very sentence, corresponding to the hook's statement. I do not see an in-line citation of this sort in the article. Second, I still have considerable doubts about notability of the subject of the article, at least in terms of such notability being demonstrated by the references given in the article itself. Notability needs to be demonstrated by detailed and specific coverage in independent reliable sources, as defined by WP:V and WP:RS. Looking at the refs in the article, I see a number of refs that appear to fall short of these requirements. For example, ref no 2 (Arendt), refs no 7 and 8 (Wallace) are references to posts at personal webpages of private individuals, definitely falling short of WP:RS. Ref no 3(Obsolete Technology Homepage), also points to a private website maintained by a single individual, a technology enthusiast, according to that website's mission statement. Again, most likely does not pass WP:RS, at least not for DYK purposes. Nsk92 (talk) 15:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Schiehallion experiment

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Date and length verified, an interesting new article. However, I have a number of issues with the hook. First, it mentions too many distinct facts that (seem to) appear in different places in the article; a more straightforwardly structured hook is always preferable. The bits about validation of Newton's gravitational laws and about the contour lines are both problematic. In the background section there is a general discussion which does indicate that Newton's gravitational laws provided motivation for the experiment. However, there is no specific place in the article which says that the experiment itself did in fact validate Newton's laws. Moreover, I would be rather skeptical of making such general claims and putting them in the hook. A single experiment almost never conclusively validates a theory, especially a complex theory like Newton's law of universal gravitation. What an individual experiment can do is to provide supporting evidence for a theory. Validation as such is achieved by consensus of the scientists working in a particular area and usually occurs over an extended period of time. The bit about contour lines is also problematic. As the article itself points out, technically this was a rediscovery, with at least two prior works doing something similar. A DYK hook is not the right place for dealing with complicated matters of assigning scientific credit of this kind. It is better to write a hook that is more factual and straightforward, e.g. something simply saying that the experiment was used to estimate the density and the mass of the Earth and the value of the gravitational constant G. (These statements would need explicit in-line citations in the article, however). Nsk92 (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • The article has been edited somewhat since this, and I have offered an alternative hook below. Responding to your points above:
  • It is difficult to divorce the attempt to measure the density of the Earth with the fact that it also yielded contour lines; this is the most interesting thing about the Schiehallion experiment, and without this, it simply becomes just another 18th century science experiment. Bill Bryson, for example, brings the two facts together in A Short History of Nearly Everything.
  • I have now added information in the article that the experiment was considered validating evidence for Newton's law of gravitation. The word "conclusively", I should point out, did not appear in the original hook, only that the experiment "provided validation".
  • As you say, the article explains that this was not the first example of a scientist using lines to join points of equal value. It was however the first published use of lines marking points of equal land height—contour lines, as opposed to isobaths and isogons—and the following references all employ language to the effect of "Hutton invented contour lines":

  • And these are media that have whole pages at their disposal to make their point. I'm not sure that, with only 200 characters at mine, that the words "invented contour lines" is too far a stretch. I have however modified my wording slightly below to say "gave cartographers contour lines"
Anyway, here is the alternative hook:
  • OK, thanks a lot for the explanation, you mostly convinced me. Date and length of the article verified, online refs verified. The hook sounds a little awakward (the part about contour lines), but I think it is OK. Nsk92 (talk) 16:13, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Thanks! Should anyone prefer a trimmed hook, I have provided a second one below that omits the middle part about Newton;'s Law (I'm really loathe to drop the part about contour lines):

E14 munition and possibly E86 cluster bomb

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

This alternate hook could go two ways, it could be a double hook, but you'd probably have to let E86 cluster bomb slide, because by my count its only about 1,480 characters, and I really don't think I can get any more out of it without being wordy and ridiculous. Unless someone else has another source, of course. Alternatively, this hook could be used without E86 cluster bomb bolded as one of the hook articles like so:
--IvoShandor (talk) 13:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Silk Engineering

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 10:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

William Watson (track and field athlete)

Template:DYKsuggestion Cbl62 (talk) 08:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Qi Kang

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:09, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

List of Tampa Bay Rays managers

Might as well mention that none of them has a winning record. BTW, the first three were actually managers for the Tampa Bay Devil Rays. --74.13.128.83 (talk) 14:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
How about this. Your suggestion is at the bottom. -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 spell my name backwards at 16:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

ALT1 ... that all four of the managers for the Tampa Bay (Devil) Rays, a Major League Baseball franchise based in St. Petersburg, Florida, have never had a winning percentage with the (Devil) Rays? -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 spell my name backwards at 16:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

ALT2 ... that none of the managers of the Tampa Bay (Devil) Rays, a Major League Baseball team based in St. Petersburg, Florida, has ever had a winning record with the team? - (still not quite perfect, but I think this is closer) Dravecky (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
'ALT3 ... that the Tampa Bay (Devil) Rays, a Major League Baseball team located in St. Petersburg, Florida, has had a losing record under each of its four managers?--Wehwalt (talk) 02:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Samuel Fryar

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Commando (pigeon)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • A picture would be great. The article is new and meets the date requirement. Can some check the length for me? I think calling him a WWII pigeon is weird. How about ... that a pigeon named Commando carried crucial intelligence during World War II and received the Dickin Medal in 1945? I can't find anything about the King's pigeon. Royal Blue seems to be another bird used during the war. Sources from the time of the award would be good too. Most of the sources are from the auction of the medal. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Carabane

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

ALT1 ... that Captain Aristide Protet was shot with a poisoned arrow on the island of Carabane, where he was subsequently buried standing up? (grave pictured)



Perhaps this would be better as a double nomination:

ALT2 ... that the Jola, the majority ethnic group in Carabane (scenery pictured), are very distinct from other major ethnic groups in Senegal by their language, egalitarian society, freedom from political hierarchy, and lack of slavery. Neelix (talk) 19:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Czerwone maki na Monte Cassino

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Pocahontas Island, Virginia

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

First Baptist Church (Petersburg, Virginia)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

This article currently isn't long enough for Did You Know. Please see #Instructions for details. Art LaPella (talk) 21:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Lengthened. Art LaPella (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Gillfield Baptist Church, Virginia

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

This article currently isn't long enough for Did You Know. Please see #Instructions for details. Art LaPella (talk) 21:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Lengthened. Art LaPella (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Art, I've found more material for the article and it's now over 2500 characters.--Parkwells (talk) 02:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 27

Friedrich Ritter von Röth

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

No problem; I have added a citation of book by same author I quoted from the forum. You now have a source that fulfills your reliability requirement.

FYI, http:www.theaerodrome.com's forum contains informative dialogue by the authors of the Osprey series of books about World War I aviation, as well as other experts on the subject. So long as I consider the individual, I can find reliable info in these forums, as well as leads to books. Admittedly, I also find much to question or ignore.

Georgejdorner (talk) 08:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Offline ref now present.  Sandstein  10:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

M. Bhaktavatsalam

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Barack the Magic Negro

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Does this fall foul of "Articles and hooks which focus on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided"? The term negro has negative associations or connotations (where's LinguistatLarge for the right terminology?). I don't like to play censor, but this one has a bit of stingyness that I'm not sure is appropriate. As I understand it, the term is a bit like calling someone "boy". — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChildofMidnight (talkcontribs) 08:05, 29 December 2008 UTC (UTC)

The article doesn't "focus on negative aspects of living individuals." It's about a song that has generated controversy, in part because of the negative connotation that you cited. —David Levy 10:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


City of Clarence

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Emil Løvlien

Template:DYKsuggestion at 12:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Zheng Yuqing

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Paul Verner

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I think it's interesting that he lived in exile (from the nationalists) and fought in the Spanish Civil War. I would go with: " that East German communist Paul Verner (pictured) spent years in exile and fought as a volunteer in the International Brigades during the Spanish Civil War?" I might even leave out the International Brigades. I don't think most people know what that is. You could even say he fled the nationalists in Germany and fought against Franco's nationalist forces in Spain. Interesting article. A lot of interesting history in there. The intro needs to be expanded to summarize the rest of the article.ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
My worry is that saying East German is strange since we're talking about what is now Germany and what was Germany when he was fighting for Spain. Eastern Germany was inbetween. Can't they read the article to find out that he was an East German politician? I'm okay with adding he's a socialist too, although the "International" birgades is a bit of a tip off. Plus I like people going to the article to learn more. What do you think? Am I over complicating matters? My hook would need to be wikified properly. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Expresso (film)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

I have a few comments. The intro needs to be expanded to summarize the article's contents. I thought it was notable, catchy and interesting that: he connected telephone calls from war leaders to prime minister Winston Churchill who he met on several occasions when the leader wanted updates on incoming calls. Since I don't know who Norman is, the fact that his final movie was minor doesn't grab my interest. But it's an interesting article, thanks for working on it. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
As he's still alive, we don't know it's his final role, do we? Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
It's been officially called his final role. He lives in a care home and he's suffering from vascular dementia. I don't see how he could return to acting, especially since he can't remember lines anymore. - Mgm| 13:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Fine, you've answered my question. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Choa Chu Kang Community Library

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:39, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Article needs a grammar polish and explanation of words like "protyped" (which is how it's spelled in the source, too) before promotion. Source for hook is at the end of the paragraph, not the sentence, which is less of a concern than the fact that it's an article written by the National Library Board Singapore so it's not an independent third-party source. - Dravecky (talk) 10:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Zhao Zongru

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

I like the hook. Short and catchy. I also think it's notable that all six emperor names end in zong. What are the odds on that? :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

-zong is commonly used in the Temple name of Chinese emperors. May I suggest not showing the word "Emperor" six times? --74.13.128.83 (talk) 14:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Crepidotus versutus

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

The hook is sourced, but (the explanation in the article *clarification added) seems bogus. I think it's may be called "clever" because the mushroom looks kind of brainy (ie. like a brain). Also I thought epithets were derogatory comments along racial lines. I would use something about it being saprobic. I think people will want to find out what that means. It sounds kind of exciting! A saprobic mushroom from wherever. If you really want to go all out you can include its hairy pileus, people want to know about that stuff! ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Great news! I figured out the name. It looks like a brain cut in half (profile) cross section. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Not sure what you want me to do with this - the hook is sourced, like you said, and I don't understand your "bogus" claim. Whether it was named clever because of the reason I wrote in the article (suggested in the original source), or your conjecture doesn't seem to me have relevance regarding the validity of the DYK hook. Note that "specific epithet" is linked so that readers who don't know what the term means can easily find out. Sasata (talk) 17:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
If you're going to hook people into an article don't you want the article to be the best possible? Aren't you curious about the name? Did the whole clever because it grows upward explanation make sense to you when the mushroom looks so much like a cross section of a brain? ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Well, actually, it did make sense to me :) All species in genus Crepidotus have a similar morphology (i.e., resembling the x-sectioned brain as you aptly describe it), so it would be somewhat illogical to have the epithet refer specifically to this characteristic for this particular species. My guess is that the naming author was particularly impressed by this fungus' ability to properly orient itself for optimal spore dispersal - common in species with 'typical' mushrooms shape, but not so much in species that have one surface directly attached to the growing surface.
  • Hook, citation, date and length OK. As to the controversy above, the hook fact is sourced to a reliable academic source, which is all we need. The published opinion of experts is to be preferred over the ad hoc conjecture of on editor.  Sandstein  07:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Leaving Springfield

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Interesting! how about... "that The Simpsons television show has inspired a non-fiction book discussing capitalism, the Cold War, and nuclear arms"? Hmmm? Makes you want to read the article doesn't it! I don't think the title of the book or the words "discusses issues presented" are catchy enough. But then I was raised on Bart, Beavis and Cartman. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I think the initial hook presented is fine. Your alt hook does not include the title of the new article, or a link to it. Cirt (talk) 06:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
LOL, details details. How about: that The Simpsons inspired a non-fiction book on capitalism, the Cold War, and nuclear arms called Leaving Springfield. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Well, the book is not only on "capitalism, the Cold War, and nuclear arms", so the phrasing in the suggested ALT hook is sort of actually more awkward than the initial hook. Cirt (talk) 08:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
ALT hook: ... that The Simpsons inspired a non-fiction book discussing the television program's take on capitalism, the Cold War, and nuclear arms, called Leaving Springfield? (I still think the initial hook is better - this type of rearrangement is quite awkward). Cirt (talk) 08:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough. The initial hook it is! ChildofMidnight (talk) 10:09, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Okay thanks. Cirt (talk) 10:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

or: ... that The Simpsons inspired a non-fiction book on topics including capitalism, the Cold War, and nuclear arms called Leaving Springfield?

What do you think Cirt? And when are the Science textbooks based on Beavis and Butthead coming out? ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Again, the hook doesn't work. This latest ALT hook has the same problem as the others - it is misleading because it makes the reader think that the book is about "capitalism, the Cold War, and nuclear arms", when in actuality these issues are discussed within the context of the program itself. Cirt (talk) 07:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
You have a point. But it doesn't say the book is about those topics, it says it is on topics "including" those. For further context all they need is to read the article. And I thought the whole idea of baiting a hook is to lure them in with a juicy piece of meat... before BANG you're reeling them in for dinner... ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
But it is not a book on topics "including" those topics, it is a book on The Simpsons, which happens to discuss those topics, among others. That is why the wording in the initial hook works better. Cirt (talk) 08:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Cui Sun

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:53, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Galician slaughter

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on December 26

Albert Norden

Cape Grim massacre

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Esix Snead

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I was trying to emphasize that he had a very substantial number of stolen bases in the minors, but never really made it as a major leaguer. The "but only" was intended in comparison to the number stolen in the minors not to minimize stealing 4 bases in 18 major league games, which would be about 35 in a full 162-game season. I wonder if "and" instead of "but only" loses that hookiness? Alansohn (talk) 21:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree that switching them around makes it read better. I do have a minor quibble, though; the word "but" still makes it read as though we're passing some sort of judgment on his accomplishments, IMHO. To me it reads like, "...Snead wasn't very good in the majors, but he did really well in the minors!" I think using "compared to" takes our opinion out of it entirely and lets the reader make up their own mind (lets them make the comparison for themselves, if you will). So my suggestion would be (ALT 4) ... that baseball player Esix Snead had four stolen bases in two brief appearances in the major leagues with the New York Mets compared to 507 in nine minor-league seasons? faithless () 19:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

<outdent> I'm a little confused. The original hook says 4 stolen bases in 2 brief appearances. Then there is mention of 18 games? How many games did he play in? If he stole 4 bases in 2 appearances I don't see a quibble, I think we just go with the original hook and replace the word "but" with the word "and". It's clear he didn't make it in the majors if he's only had 2 appearances. Isn't the whole point that he's notable for a zillion minor league and a few in the major league, why are we but-butting? I would also take out the word brief. Why were his appearances brief? The original hook is fine assuming he had 2 appearances, we just replace but with and. We don't have to explain why his career in the majors was short. People can read the article.ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I guess the question is what is meant by "appearances". Snead was called up to the majors twice, getting into 17 games the first time and one the 2nd. Appearances here doesn't (or shouldn't, anyway) mean games played. But I am not sure that the number of call ups to the majors he had is really relevant to the hook. So it seems to me that the following would appropriately contrast his major and minor league stolen base record without introducing confusion as to what is meant by "appearances", because 4 stolen bases in 2 games would be a lot: (ALT 5)... that baseball player Esix Snead stole 507 bases in the minor-leagues but had just four stolen bases in the major leagues? Or else maybe something like: (ALT 6)... that baseball player Esix Snead had four stolen bases in 18 major league games, but stole 507 bases in nine minor-league seasons? Rlendog (talk) 06:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Abe Hartley

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I like the hook. My only question is whether to say "hand-rolled" instead of "rolled up". What is a rolled up cigarette? I guess if the source says rolled up maybe that has to be stuck with, but it seems a bit weird to me. Aren't all cigarettes rolled up? Am I too picky? ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
One source does phrase it slightly differently, referring to his "curious habit of rolling a cigarette...", so re-word the hook by all means. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 08:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
or we could just leave the whole "rolling" bit out and just say he kept a cigarette behind his ear. Are we going to be blamed for making smoking seem cool? Do we need to include a "WARNING"? Can you find a source that says he coughed? I noticed he died young... maybe we can throw that in. No, it's all good. I'm just a little hopped up... (get it???). Did he keep his cigarettes in a pouch? ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Kamila Skolimowska

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I added the word "age", or it could be written as "at 17 years and 331 days old", otherwise it's not clear what "at 17 years and 331 days" means. Also I think the picture isn't of her at that age, so it's a bit misleading. But as long as the pic isn't used it's no worries. Probably a pic of her competing would be more appropriate anyway. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Isaac Toussie

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

This one is timely. Politzer where are you? Get to work! ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Currently has a {{notability}} tag.  Sandstein  17:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I am not sure about notability (although the case does have a WP:BLP1E and WP:NOT#NEWS feel to it and the entry cannot be approved for DYK with a notability tag still in it), but I think this entry is unsuitable for DYK on other grounds. One of the official DYK rules says "Articles and hooks which focus on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided." This article (and the hook) focuses almost entirely on the negative aspects associated with the subject, namely his fraud conviction and the pardon controversy. Given that almost all the coverage available is about that, it is hard to imagine this article being reconfigured into something more balanced, so I do not think this entry is or can be made suitable for DYK. Perhaps WP:ITN is a better place for it, but I don't think we can use it here at DYK. Nsk92 (talk) 18:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


al-Muallaq Mosque

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:10, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Not quite a 5X expansion (at 4.4X right now), needs about 200 more characters. Also, could the references be formatted (publishers, last access dates)? That makes it easier to evaluate the sources at a first glance. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:36, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I am sorry but this is a new article. When I nominated this article I didn't know how DYK worked. But I have now changed it into a new article. Sorry for the trouble. Also I don't know how to formate the refereces, can you tell me how to? But I'll do my best anyway. --Fipplet (talk) 21:10, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Johannes Scherg

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Article length, date, and hooks' length check out, but what make either of the two sources used reliable? In addition, the sources should have last access dates and publishers in their citations. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Wilfried Hartung

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Gordon Wood (rugby player)

Araripesuchus

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I prefer:"... that the five species of crocodilia known as Araripesuchus lived 125 to 60 million years ago during the Cretaceous period?" You lost me on the "Cretaceous terrestrial distinct" part, but I'm just a lay person... How did they get from Africa to South America? ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Seems ok as well. I added info in the main article on the Africa-South America (Gondwana) aspect. Shrumster (talk) 10:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Cool. Thanks! Hopefully Art or Politzer will quit mucking about so we can get this thing approved! :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
The "125 to 60 My ago" bit doesn't seem to be cited to any of the references. Could a cite be added? The rest (date, length, and source for the other hook) are fine. Olaf Davis (talk) 10:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Copied references of the earliest and latest specimens to ref the date range. Shrumster (talk) 14:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! Offline refs taken on good faith. Olaf Davis (talk) 23:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


François Charles Archile Jeanneret

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Operation Pleshet

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:11, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Joseph Dennie

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

futureU

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Nancy Blackett (character)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

East Ghor Main Canal

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Southworth House

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

So that's how the comma got there? I removed it because I thought it was a typo that I had made. Well, if that's the accepted pattern, no complaints; I've restored it. Thanks for explaining. Nyttend (talk) 21:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
That comma looks ridiculous. Can we immediately reach consensus that random commas that serve no purpose aren't a good idea and revise the guideline? ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I would love it if we can reach a consensus, any consensus, at WP:COMMA or Talk:Comma, or even that this particular sentence is an exception. Just tell me what the rule is, so I can apply it. At the moment, the best indication of a consensus is that WP:COMMA is in the Manual of Style. may also be helpful. Art LaPella (talk) 06:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I don't like the comma either. I prefer the alternate hook to get rid of the comma :-) Nyttend (talk) 15:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Norton CS1

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 14:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Winlock W. Steiwer

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Orbiliaceae

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

ALT: ... that some members of the fungal family Orbiliaceae can lasso nematodes using outgrowths of their hyphae? Sasata (talk) 16:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
The ALT is great. I don't even think lasso needs to be in quotes. Isn't that exactly what lasso means? I have to go read the article to find out more... good job! ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Upon inspection I notice the lasso claim is uncited and seems a bit of a stretch (it's perhaps not exactly a lasso action). I think a cited bit supporting a carniverous fungi DYK hook would be just fine. ChildofMidnight (talk) 09:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I've added another (online) citation (+ link to PDF of article) for the lasso action, and removed quotes from hook. Sasata (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The citation does use the word lasso to describe the ring swelling action that traps prey (one of five methods) these nifty fungi use. It doesn't meet my definition of a lasso action (where's the throw?) but if you don't think carniverous fungi is exciting enough, I can live with it. :) Also, the introduction should be expanded to reflect teh article contents. It's kind of short.ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
I've added another sentence so the lead section should be proportional to the length of the article. BTW, I did think the original lead was exciting enough, I added the ALT to satisfy another DYK editor who didn't think it was :) Cheers Sasata (talk) 17:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Cradle of Rome

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:48, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Terrence Oglesby

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Buffalo Killers

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:25, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Robert McKechnie

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

List of Houston Astros managers

Tsarist autocracy

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Bernard McMahon

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:59, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The source doesn't make it quite clear to me that Jefferson was responsible. It says McMahon was entrusted with the seeds, and then "Jefferson insisted that these new discoveries were the property of the expedition and of the federal government, so McMahon was forced, perhaps rightfully so, to grow these novelties under restriction in a quarantine-like situation." But this seems compatible with the reading that once he'd been given the seeds, Jefferson set the quarantine requirement on him. It's possible I've missed something from another part of the source, though. Olaf Davis | Talk 09:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
I had thought "Beginning in 1806 McMahon was trusted with seeds and plants collected from the Lewis and Clark expedition" would be direct enough: I've added a second Monticello reference that also contains the statement. If the source didn't quite make it clear, perhaps the link wasn't clicked on; footnote text highlighted in purple can be clicked on to read on-line text, which is an intrinsic part of the footnote. --Wetman (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
I did go to the link and the sentence you quote is clear - the only problem is the latter doesn't mention Jefferson. Could you point out where it says that it was Jefferson who was responsible for assigning McMahon the duty, please? (It's possible I'm missing it because I'm tired - I will go to sleep soon and come back to this next year!) Olaf Davis (talk) 23:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Hasta la vista, baby (film)

Template:DYKsuggestion

Rudolf Wolters

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Howard K. Smith: News and Comment

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Suggest adding ", as it proved, " before premature.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 25

Zaprešić

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)






Hendrik Wagenvoort

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Length, date, and verification a-ok. However, I don't feel the hook would be interesting to many people who don't know how much of an accomplishment 38 doctoral dissertations is. How about:
ALT1: ... that classical scholar Hendrik Wagenvoort directed 38 doctoral dissertations during his career, an unusually high number in the field of classical studies? Terrakyte (talk) 04:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Chola Navy

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Anyone??? Sniperz11@S 08:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
"Unwritten" Rule G1. Art LaPella (talk) 22:49, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 24

Pennsylvania Route 237

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:26, 29 December 2008 (UTC)



Youngstown and Southeastern Railroad

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


Glengoyne Distillery

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Sadly it's only a two-fold expansion counting characters of prose (i.e. not the table of whiskey types) which is what DYK goes by. A shame because that's a great hook. Olaf Davis | Talk 09:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Dirty Epics

  • The article doesn't say what the Irish Independent's opinion of the band was. The reference and the hook does – I think the article just needs to be tweaked a little. --Bruce1ee 13:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

al-Khadra Mosque

Template:DYKsuggestion 19:43, 26 December 2008

That's fine with me. --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Coat of arms of Singapore

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Length and date are OK, and the article is interesting, but I strongly recommend writing another hook. The current hook is incomprehensible (and hence uninteresting) to me as a layperson because I don't know what the Darjah Utama Temasek and the Sijil Kemuliaan are, or what an "achievement" of a coat of arms is (presumably heraldic jargon?). Also, the verb "uses" is in the singular despite having two subjects; it should be in the plural ("use"). Maybe the following would work?
"... that the Singapore coat of arms is reproduced in full on two national awards, the Darjah Utama Temasek and Sijil Kemuliaan?"
But that doesn't sound like a very interesting fact, either. (And the article would have to be adopted accordingly.)  Sandstein  20:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
What would you suggest? What stands out in your mind? User:Zscout370 21:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Maybe: "... that only the government of Singapore is allowed to use the coat of arms of Singapore (pictured)?" That would need an inline citation in the article.  Sandstein  17:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)



Norton International

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 15:56, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

I have edited that hook to make it shorter. --Orlady (talk) 19:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Independence Dam State Park

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:37, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Pennsylvania Route 664

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

  • ALT2 is completely unremarkable. The main hook or ALT1 may be remarkable, but there are a few issues: (a) You can't say it was exactly 36 years with only maps (in fact, it could be as little as 23 years given the sources cited), and (b) it reads as if paving was a continuous process, rather than done in spurts. --NE2 22:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)



Colin McCool with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948, Ron Hamence with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948, Doug Ring with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:50, 24 December 2008 (UTC)




I Love Katamari

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Sounds a bit like an ad to me, and I can't seem to find where this statement is explictly made and cited in the article. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that the ball in the video game I Love Katamari can be rolled by tilting the iPhone/iPod Touch in the direction the player wants the ball to go? MuZemike (talk) 00:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 23

Nestoridae

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:20, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Prussian G 8

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • This article has no inline citations; in fact, there is not even a general reference, only an external link to a forum. I'm sorry, but this article is not eligible for DYK in its current state. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Oops, I had forgotten to add <references/>, and that the story of the return from Turkey is covered in a book that was already listed at the museum's article, titled (in German): "Return from the Orient: the adventurous journey of a Prussian steam locomotive". I hope that is sufficient. :-) -- Matthead  Discuß   15:54, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


Manuel Klein

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Hi. I changed it to "that led to his death". How is that? I don't think we have room to add that he returned to the US, but I think the important part is that he died as a result of the Zeppelin trauma? Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


Noel Dossou-Yovo

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:22, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Golf House

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The sentence stating that the house was bought for around $3 million needs to be cited. If the source itself can't be accessed by the web, then an off-line reference will be ok. Terrakyte (talk) 16:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Pennsylvania Route 368

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Your reference for the 1928 creation is a 1928 map, which only means it was assigned by 1928. Similarly, we know that the new alignment is shown as complete on a 1935 map, which means it was complete by then if PennDOH didn't jump the gun. But its non-presence on the 1934 map means that, if PennDOH never forgot to add a minor realignment, it was opened in either 1934 or 1935. Also, unless the 1934 and 1935 maps are more detailed than the 1930 map, there's no basis for assuming that it used Perryville Road. Finally, this is not interesting. Roads are realigned all the time, and there's no evidence here that this was anything but a normal realignment, built about eight years after the route was designated (and some more years after the road was first added to the state highway system as LR 311). --NE2 21:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
    Its a bad wording. I guess I am an idiot at this too. I mean construction and paving, not realignments.Mitch32 21:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
    It's still extremely common for a route, in the early days of state highway systems, to have not been paved when it was first designated. Maybe you could say something about how it no longer meets its "parent" (better term for that?) due to a truncation that eliminated an overlap? --NE2 21:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
    Little more boring, but fine.Mitch32 14:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

ALT: ... that the original alignment of Pennsylvania Route 368 is now a piece of Pennsylvania Route 58?Mitch32 00:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Stanley A. McChrystal

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I'm not sure about Misplaced Pages politics, but it was McChrystal's job to catch terrorists, and most people would consider his success to be a "credit". I don't think the phrase goes out of its way to take sides. Art LaPella (talk) 03:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes, catch them, but not kill them. I'm not saying it's not NPOV, I just have a hard time using the word "credit" when taking someone's life. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
  • While that's his job, this hook implies he went out and killed Zarqawi himself, which is not the case. The article and references confirm that Bush "credited" him with killing Zarqawi, but it just meant he commanded the forces that did, he didn't actually kill anyone, and it has probably been a long time since he did (if he ever did). I think, as is, the hook is too misleading and awkward to use.--IvoShandor (talk) 06:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 2008

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Randy Boone

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:57, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Citation was added with the sentence about the two 90-minute westerns as requested. The citation that was there was for the whole first paragraph, not just the particular sentence.Billy Hathorn (talk) 01:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
  • OK the info about the westerns has been verified with the assumption of good faith, as it is an offline source. However, the information about Randy Boone's relations to Daniel Boone is sourced to a site with very questionable reliability, http://www.hollywoodteenmovies.com/PAT%20BOONE.html. I would find something a bit more reliable. If not, then you should probably remove the info from the hook; that would work, although the hook would not be as interesting. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
  • BTW, it is critical that you find a better source for the Daniel Boone relation information, as it is WP:BLP material. If we cannot find a good source, then we have to remove the info, from the hook and the article. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

It's a Man's World (TV series)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Hook needs rewriting for NPOV and uncited language ("restless youth", "considerable viewer protests). I can't find the fact about nineteen episodes in the article. I am also concerned about the article's reliance on imbd.com, whose reliability is at best marginal. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
  • The viewer protests, restlessness, idealism, and iconoclasm allcome the New York Times reference. The list of 19 episodes is available from imdb.com, as noted in the first phrase of the article. Billy Hathorn (talk) 01:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
  • imbd.com is at best a marginally reliable source, but I will leave that for another time. We need an inline citation immediately after the sentence(s) that provide the material for the hook. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:43, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 22

Cephalic presentation

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Creation history and length verified; offfline journal sources accepted on GF. I favour the first hook as it relates directly to the article subject; the face presentation hook refers to a much rarer variant, and linking directly to face presentation causes a redirect to the main article. The Smellie image is well over 200 years old and should therefore be usable on the Main Page. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 16:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Suggestion:If you take the first hook the Smellie plate XIV is more appropriate as it shows the most common presentation not a rarer variant: -Smellie XIV.JPG- Ekem (talk) 15:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Zimbabwe and the Commonwealth of Nations

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't find that point completely addressed in the article, and it seems a bit misleading.--Wehwalt (talk) 02:10, 31 December 2008 (UTC)



Maurice Kouandété

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

The country was not known as Benin (but Dahomey) when Maurice was in charge. Did he take the title "President"? The wikipage List of heads of state of Benin didn't say so.
  • The first hook's assertion that Kouandété was president is not inline-cited in the article. As for the second hook, the words "head of state" are not even in the article.  Sandstein  08:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Click on "heads of state" in the hook, and you'll find Kouandété there. How Kouandété's wikibio is fixed is up to Editorofthewiki. --PFHLai (talk) 14:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
I guess I was a bit vague about that part. Will add. ~EDDY ~ 21:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 21

Yes-no question

  • ... that when computer scientists and others treat questions such as "Would you like chicken or roast beef for dinner?" as yes-no questions they are exploiting a real linguistic ambiguity in such questions?

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (talk) 20:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

  • For DYK purposes, we rarely accept instances where a single reference "covers" an entire paragraph; we require that there be an inline citation next to each fact. For example, in the paragraph you and I are looking at in this article, the content of that footnote is ambiguous: it's at the very end of the paragraph, so a reader doesn't know if it's "covering" the whole paragraph or just the comment "Such questions are labelled declarative questions, and are also available as an option in those languages that have other ways of asking yes-no questions" (or, for that matter, the comment about intonation in Jakaltek). These referencing issues are exacerbated more, even, in cases like this, where the references are offline books so the reader can't easily check for himself to see what's in there. Therefore, a hook talking about the cross-linguistic variation or listing examples of other languages would not be accepted right now, with the reference the way it is; there would have to be separate inline citations for each example given in that paragraph (even if all the inline citations are all to the same source). —Politizer /contribs 21:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
  • As you wish. All I'm saying is, when you have a paragraph like that and then a single book reference at the end, if I as the reader don't have access to the book then I have no idea whether it's 5 (or however many) sentences all covered by one reference, or 4 bits of unreferenced OR followed by one other sentence that happens to have a reference. —Politizer /contribs 22:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
  • DYK requires that the DYK hook be inline cited in the article for the article to appear on the Main Page. The inline discussions mentioned above likely do not address the circumstances where the article will be linked from the Main Page, which receives 3,000,000+ hits a day. -- Suntag 04:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Generally when I use a single source for an entire paragraph I just note that this is the case in citation itself, I did something like that on 1st Gas Regiment. I am inclined to agree that if the fact is easily verifiable and the submitting editor goes that extra length to make sure a reader knows that the entire graf is cited to that one source then it really shouldn't be a problem for DYK purposes.--IvoShandor (talk) 05:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree with you, but in this case the fact isn't easily verifiable; the paragraph is a list of several examples, which in theory could come from anywhere, and the reference at the end of the paragraph is an offline source so most readers have no way to check. —Politizer /contribs 05:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
  • A simple solution is a note in the citation that it is for all examples. Offline really hasn't a thing to do with it, as most readers in the western world would have easy access to a local or university library, while its not as easily verifiable (being offline), it's still not difficult. If a citation is truly redundant there isn't much of a point in demanding multiple cites, especially if it could easily be solved with a note in the actual citation itself, as I did on the gas regiment article. Just my thoughts. --IvoShandor (talk) 06:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC) Not that I even think this is that big of a deal or anything, if it were me I would just add the citation, because who cares? It's Misplaced Pages, but if we can make it easier for nominators, we should.--IvoShandor (talk) 06:18, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
  • As near as I can tell, the hook doesn't come from the Cruttenden supported paragraph. It comes from Greg W. Scragg (1996). Problem Solving with Computers. Since the source was presented in the article as off line, Jonathan could have made the hook a little easier to verify through the wording in the article text. -- Suntag 07:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I think Jonathan took your above 21:43, 21 December 2008 post to mean that DYK wouldn't accept the original hook unless Jonathan added an inline reference on the end of each sentence in the Cruttenden supported paragraph. It looks like this thread resulted from a missundersdanding. (It would really be ironic if the missundersdanding were from a linguistic ambiguity.). -- Suntag 13:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I located the "chicken or roast beef for dinner" quote in this source. The hook should be revised to say something like "when computer scientists and others intentionally treat". The phrase "linguistic ambiguity" should appear some place in the article. The idea that "all" computer scientist are "exploiting" the ambiguity when they treat the question as a yes-no question is based on author Greg W. Scragg's opinion about computer scientist. However, it is presented as a fact in the hook. -- Suntag 07:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)







Ukrainian National Democratic Alliance

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

What sentences in the article would support this statement? And frankly, I'm more comfortable with it being given as a quote because it's a very subjective statement otherwise ... who called them a voice of moderation (I didn't find that last word in the article, at least not using my browser's "find" function)? Or what was moderate about them compared to, say, other Ukrainian political parties of the era? Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Monarchies in Oceania

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

The Times article only established Charles as heir apparent and does not make a good source for the countries for which this is so. Nor is the Tongan monarchy cited, at least not in the table. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Well, this article gives links to "Monarchies of <country in Oceania>". The article is mainly a summary of all monarchies in Oceania. Most references are on the main article of the said monarchy, since this article is cleary a summary of the monarchies in the area, I thought I wouldn't need to add lots of references, most of the relevant links to other WIkipedia articles are there. --Knowzilla 06:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The article does contain more than 1,500 characters of prose text, and the hook is less than 200 characters. Date of article ok for DYK. However, the fact in the hook isn't cited in the article. I may be wrong but, Knowzilla, I believe you were implying in the post above this that the fact in the hook is cited in other Misplaced Pages articles, so you didn't see the need to add a cite for the fact in the Monarchies in Oceania article. I understand your reasoning, and I have no doubt that the fact is true. However, as the DYK criteria states at the top of this page, the fact in a hook should "always cited in the article with an inline citation". Therefore, until the hook is cited, this DYK nom can't pass. Terrakyte (talk) 15:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I have added a reference for the hook, can the article pass now? :) --Knowzilla 06:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 20

Hwanbyeokdang

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Article dates from the 20th and I get approx 1685 English characters so that bit is fine. I find the hook ever so slightly iffy though but I can't quite put my finger on it. It's not so much the Korean ref as the phrasing I think. I don't know about the word "regarding" but I'll leave that up to someone else. --➨♀♂Candlewicke S# :) 08:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
If you have a better hook, could you suggest one? If we exclude the above hook, well, I don't know what could be a interesting fact from the article.--Caspian blue 17:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
How can a pavilion have a tale? Suggest wording change to "is associated with" from "has"--Wehwalt (talk) 02:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing out on the grammatical error.--Caspian blue 08:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

One Tree Island (Queensland)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

  • There is no ref after the line in the article that forms the hook. On top of this the refs are mainly offline hindering me from locating and repairing it at ease. --➨♀♂Candlewicke S# :) 08:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Kattowitzer Volkswille

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

  • What is and isn't interesting is in the end somewhat subjective. I find the impact Nazism in Germany had on socialist/leftwing movements in neighbouring countries interesting, I leave it to other editors to decide on the dyk suggestion. --Soman (talk) 00:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I can't think of another hook that could be more interesting to a wider audience, and since no alternatives have been forthcoming for over 4 days, I believe this nom should be failed. It is technically ok, as Sandstein said, but I agree that the current hook isn't very exciting.Terrakyte (talk) 14:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Canadian sovereignty

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:49, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The article is very good and meets all our standards (the only minor thing it needs is work on the lead-in, which I mentioned at the talk page). But this hook seems a little dry. Are there any crazy little facts or anything that you could suggest as an alternate hook? —Politizer /contribs 23:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
  • It's not the most exciting subject ever. How about:
  • ALT1: ... that the sovereignty of Canada has become an increasingly relevant issue in recent years as Arctic ice in Northern Canada has melted?
or something along those lines. I never was great at grammar. Oh, and I'm working on the intro right now. Bsimmons666 (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I verified this a moment ago, but I just realized we will have to check it a little more closely...since it was originally made mostly by combining other articles, I think we'll have to see how much of it really is "new" content. I'll try to take a look sometime soon, but if any other reviewers are reading this it would also help to have a second opinion, as always. —Politizer /contribs 06:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Satisfied (album)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I prefer the second, but it could be reworded considering he probably didn't write it in the shower. BTW, source is a 25 min. podcast so good faith is probably the go. :) —97198 (talk) 08:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Promoted entries

Queues

Queue 1

The hooks below have been approved by a human (– 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs)) and will be automatically added to the DYK template at the appropriate time.


Flag of Okinawa PrefectureFlag of Okinawa Prefecture


Queue 2

The hooks below have been approved by a human (RoySmith (talk)) and will be automatically added to the DYK template at the appropriate time.


Lilium lophophorum flowerLilium lophophorum flower


Queue 3

The hooks below have been approved by a human (~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)) and will be automatically added to the DYK template at the appropriate time.


Adrien NunezAdrien Nunez


Queue 4

REMOVE THIS MESSAGE WHEN ADDING HOOKS TO THE QUEUE

This queue is currently empty. When hooks are added, they must be approved by adding {{DYKbotdo|~~~}} to the top of the page; the bot will not make any updates unless this is added. Remove this message when adding the hooks.

DYK queues
Queue 1
Queue 2
Queue 3
Queue 4
Queue 5
Queue 6
Queue 7
Clear
Next queue
Queue 6
update
edit
history
purge
DYK prep areas
Prep 1
Prep 2
Prep 3
Prep 4
Prep 5
Prep 6
Prep 7
Clear
Next prep for promotion
Prep 4
update
edit
history
purge


Queue 5

REMOVE THIS MESSAGE WHEN ADDING HOOKS TO THE QUEUE

This queue is currently empty. When hooks are added, they must be approved by adding {{DYKbotdo|~~~}} to the top of the page; the bot will not make any updates unless this is added. Remove this message when adding the hooks.

DYK queues
Queue 1
Queue 2
Queue 3
Queue 4
Queue 5
Queue 6
Queue 7
Clear
Next queue
Queue 6
update
edit
history
purge
DYK prep areas
Prep 1
Prep 2
Prep 3
Prep 4
Prep 5
Prep 6
Prep 7
Clear
Next prep for promotion
Prep 4
update
edit
history
purge


Next update queue

6

Next next update queue

Production logo for MingxingProduction logo for Mingxing


See also

zh:Misplaced Pages:新條目推薦/候選

Category: