Misplaced Pages

User talk:Lightbot: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:19, 3 January 2009 editMichael Hardy (talk | contribs)Administrators210,293 edits I have blocked this bot in order to stop it from altering dates on pages (e.g. it changed "third century BC" to "third century").← Previous edit Revision as of 16:24, 3 January 2009 edit undoLightbot (talk | contribs)791,863 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
: :
The operator of this bot needs to go back and fix '''ALL''' such edits and give some credible assurance that this bug has been fixed, before this bot can be allowed to continue to function. ] (]) 15:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC) The operator of this bot needs to go back and fix '''ALL''' such edits and give some credible assurance that this bug has been fixed, before this bot can be allowed to continue to function. ] (]) 15:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock|Thanks for stopping the bot and providing a clear example. I have traced the relevant subsection of code and fixed it. It is an infrequent false positive with a particular set of circumstances. Finding the affected articles directly is nontrivial. However, I can resample the target articles and can fix them as Lightbot is processing them. I will need both Lightbot and Lightmouse to be unblocked - the latter got hit when an autoblock was incorrectly applied to a bot account.}}

Revision as of 16:24, 3 January 2009

This user account is a bot operated by Lightmouse (talk). It is used to make repetitive automated or semi-automated edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually, in accordance with the bot policy.
Administrators: if this bot is malfunctioning or causing harm, please block it.

If you want to know what it is approved to do, see:

You may also wish to look at its two other approvals:

If you have a message for the owner, use User talk:Lightmouse. Messages on this page may not be seen.

I have blocked this bot

This edit changed the words "third century BC" to "third century", making it appear that it might have been AD.

That sort of edit is not tolerable and I have accordingly blocked this bot.

The operator of this bot needs to go back and fix ALL such edits and give some credible assurance that this bug has been fixed, before this bot can be allowed to continue to function. Michael Hardy (talk) 15:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lightbot (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Thanks for stopping the bot and providing a clear example. I have traced the relevant subsection of code and fixed it. It is an infrequent false positive with a particular set of circumstances. Finding the affected articles directly is nontrivial. However, I can resample the target articles and can fix them as Lightbot is processing them. I will need both Lightbot and Lightmouse to be unblocked - the latter got hit when an autoblock was incorrectly applied to a bot account.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Thanks for stopping the bot and providing a clear example. I have traced the relevant subsection of code and fixed it. It is an infrequent false positive with a particular set of circumstances. Finding the affected articles directly is nontrivial. However, I can resample the target articles and can fix them as Lightbot is processing them. I will need both Lightbot and Lightmouse to be unblocked - the latter got hit when an autoblock was incorrectly applied to a bot account. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Thanks for stopping the bot and providing a clear example. I have traced the relevant subsection of code and fixed it. It is an infrequent false positive with a particular set of circumstances. Finding the affected articles directly is nontrivial. However, I can resample the target articles and can fix them as Lightbot is processing them. I will need both Lightbot and Lightmouse to be unblocked - the latter got hit when an autoblock was incorrectly applied to a bot account. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Thanks for stopping the bot and providing a clear example. I have traced the relevant subsection of code and fixed it. It is an infrequent false positive with a particular set of circumstances. Finding the affected articles directly is nontrivial. However, I can resample the target articles and can fix them as Lightbot is processing them. I will need both Lightbot and Lightmouse to be unblocked - the latter got hit when an autoblock was incorrectly applied to a bot account. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Categories:
User talk:Lightbot: Difference between revisions Add topic