Revision as of 01:08, 4 January 2009 editNeurolysis (talk | contribs)27,885 editsm FAIL← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:53, 4 January 2009 edit undoMe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,515 edits →BlockedNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
You have been blocked for 24 hours for disruption. It says at ] that this is to be used within policy. I don't see leaving false "AGF" messages as being in policy. --''']''' (] ]) 00:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | You have been blocked for 24 hours for disruption. It says at ] that this is to be used within policy. I don't see leaving false "AGF" messages as being in policy. --''']''' (] ]) 00:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:If you wish to contest this block, you may use <nowiki>{{unblock|</nowiki><i><nowiki>reason</nowiki></i>}}, although I strongly suggest you don't. <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>— ]</b><sup><i>]</i></sup></font> 01:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | :If you wish to contest this block, you may use <nowiki>{{unblock|</nowiki><i><nowiki>reason</nowiki></i>}}, although I strongly suggest you don't. <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>— ]</b><sup><i>]</i></sup></font> 01:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{unblock|Because rschen7754 has his gonads in a bunch and can't take a joke - specifically when the joke has absolutely nothing to do with him and he should just mind his own business. He is abusing his power and wasting everyone's time dealing with someone just messing around when a real admin should be able to tell the difference between harmless teasing and malicious edits.}} |
Revision as of 04:53, 4 January 2009
This is Me's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Template:Archive box collapsible
Protection
I've fully protected your userpage. If you're willing to stop adding the category, drop me a line and I'll remove the protection. EVula // talk // ☯ // 23:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked for 24 hours for disruption. It says at WP:TWINKLE that this is to be used within policy. I don't see leaving false "AGF" messages as being in policy. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- If you wish to contest this block, you may use {{unblock|reason}}, although I strongly suggest you don't. — neuro 01:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Me (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Because rschen7754 has his gonads in a bunch and can't take a joke - specifically when the joke has absolutely nothing to do with him and he should just mind his own business. He is abusing his power and wasting everyone's time dealing with someone just messing around when a real admin should be able to tell the difference between harmless teasing and malicious edits.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Because rschen7754 has his gonads in a bunch and can't take a joke - specifically when the joke has absolutely nothing to do with him and he should just mind his own business. He is abusing his power and wasting everyone's time dealing with someone just messing around when a real admin should be able to tell the difference between harmless teasing and malicious edits. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Because rschen7754 has his gonads in a bunch and can't take a joke - specifically when the joke has absolutely nothing to do with him and he should just mind his own business. He is abusing his power and wasting everyone's time dealing with someone just messing around when a real admin should be able to tell the difference between harmless teasing and malicious edits. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Because rschen7754 has his gonads in a bunch and can't take a joke - specifically when the joke has absolutely nothing to do with him and he should just mind his own business. He is abusing his power and wasting everyone's time dealing with someone just messing around when a real admin should be able to tell the difference between harmless teasing and malicious edits. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}