Misplaced Pages

User talk:Alonzo33: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:08, 9 January 2009 editAlonzo33 (talk | contribs)40 edits Point of View← Previous edit Revision as of 01:23, 9 January 2009 edit undoAlonzo33 (talk | contribs)40 edits Point of ViewNext edit →
Line 28: Line 28:


Well, I have asked for the Forbes vs. Entrepreneur question 3 times and have gotten no answer. Either you are busy writing a piece that will be highly informative to me OR you have no basis for that claim that Forbes has any more credibility. Please do share the logic. Thanks in advance!] (]) 01:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC) Well, I have asked for the Forbes vs. Entrepreneur question 3 times and have gotten no answer. Either you are busy writing a piece that will be highly informative to me OR you have no basis for that claim that Forbes has any more credibility. Please do share the logic. Thanks in advance!] (]) 01:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

As I figured. At least try to be consistent when wielding the almighty internet sword. I am obviously new here and trying to learn my way. I even expressed that to you mentioning my struggle. You then state your claim(Forbes vs. Entrepreneur) and do nothing to substantiate it. I guess when you have the 'power' you need not explain a thing.
I will try to abide better tomorrow and hopefully will have better luck the 2nd time around.
] (]) 01:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


== Signature == == Signature ==

Revision as of 01:23, 9 January 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Alonzo33, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Misplaced Pages's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Deli nk (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Point of View

Please do not introduce remarks into articles that do not conform to Misplaced Pages's Neutral Point of View policy. Your recent edits to Forever Living Products seem to show a distinct bias. Peridon (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Forever Living Products, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

If you wish to introduce additional information into this article, given your clear pro-FLP point of view, I would suggest that you provide the information on the talk page with a solid set of references to reliable sources, not to puff pieces. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

mike, I am sincereley struggling here lol. I am trying to post the actual magazine article WITH the reference. It merely speaks of the growth in the aloe industry AND mentions many other companies.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Alonzo33 (talkcontribs)

Then it's not a reliable source; we need articles that are about FLP, from reliable sources (I seem to recall that Entrepeneur mostly runs puff pieces). --Orange Mike | Talk 00:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Mike what did I dissrupt? All I asked is if you really think that Entrepreneur Magazine runs 'puff pieces' meanwhile Forbes does not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alonzo33 (talkcontribs)

Did you not read Misplaced Pages:Three-revert rule? --Orange Mike | Talk 00:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

I now seee the threevert rule, thank you. Now about answering the 'puff' question between Forbes and Entrepreneur Magazine? Please do explain.Alonzo33 (talk) 01:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, I have asked for the Forbes vs. Entrepreneur question 3 times and have gotten no answer. Either you are busy writing a piece that will be highly informative to me OR you have no basis for that claim that Forbes has any more credibility. Please do share the logic. Thanks in advance!Alonzo33 (talk) 01:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

As I figured. At least try to be consistent when wielding the almighty internet sword. I am obviously new here and trying to learn my way. I even expressed that to you mentioning my struggle. You then state your claim(Forbes vs. Entrepreneur) and do nothing to substantiate it. I guess when you have the 'power' you need not explain a thing. I will try to abide better tomorrow and hopefully will have better luck the 2nd time around.

Alonzo33 (talk) 01:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Signature

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Orange Mike | Talk 00:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Orange Mike | Talk 00:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)