Revision as of 00:09, 10 January 2009 editRedthoreau (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers23,540 edits →Opinion about Che's paragraph: reply to Editor br← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:46, 10 January 2009 edit undoCoppertwig (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,262 edits →Comment: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 218: | Line 218: | ||
:::: '''Editor br''' please see my ], and take your time responding to it ''(No rush)''. ] (])RT 00:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC) | :::: '''Editor br''' please see my ], and take your time responding to it ''(No rush)''. ] (])RT 00:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Comment == | |||
Hi, Redthoreau. I'm just writing some comments at ]. <small>Re "I'll try to contain my cynicism and believe that you are truly interested in actual investigation on the matter," It's good that you're making an effort to ]. I suggest that it's more civil to keep those thoughts to yourself and phrase your comments as if you were having no difficulty assuming good faith. </small> <span style="color:Blue; font-size:11pt;">☺</span>](]) 19:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:46, 10 January 2009
Only when the last tree has withered, the last fish has been caught, and the last river has been poisoned, will you realize you cannot eat money. |
WELCOME
Feel free to email me RedThoreau@gmail.com
This user thinks that registration should be required to edit articles. |
<ref> | This user recognizes the importance of citing sources. |
This user doesn't believe in the ownership of culture and knowledge. |
Warning: If you're not a species that utilizes synapses and neural processing, you may not be able to understand this page in the same logical order that humans are capable of, nor manipulate its visual structure to relate to conceptual arrays. Actually... you wont be able to get here or comprehend this sentence, either. DOH |
Stating that something doesn't work because it violates a basic law of physics is perfectly reasonable. I can run faster than the speed of light, and I have a video tape and some crayon drawings to prove it. But no one takes me seriously, so I'm forced to conclude that I'm a persecuted visionary with ideas ahead of my time, right?
This user is one of an infinite number of "monkeys" editing Misplaced Pages right now. |
This user knows that we can't stop here – this is bat country. |
Words are loaded pistols. |
An intellectual is someone whose mind watches itself. |
Sarcasm: the last refuge of modest and chaste-souled people when the privacy of their soul is coarsely and intrusively invaded. |
Personal Notations
Note I:
Undue weight ---
NPOV says that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each. Now an important qualification: Articles that compare views should not give minority views as much or as detailed a description as more popular views, and will generally not include tiny-minority views at all.
We should not attempt to represent a dispute as if a view held by a small minority deserved as much attention as a majority view. Views that are held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views. To give undue weight to a significant-minority view, or to include a tiny-minority view, might be misleading as to the shape of the dispute. Misplaced Pages aims to present competing views in proportion to their representation among experts on the subject, or among the concerned parties. WP:UNDUEWEIGHT
Note II:
Proper capitalization is the difference between ~ "I helped my uncle Jack off a horse" and "I helped my uncle jack off a horse".
Note III:
Nutshell of Wisdom: |
If you are the only person left beating the horse after it has died, consider the possibility that you should stop. |
Note IV:
State of the Wiki Nation
“ | Misplaced Pages isn't governed by the thoughtful or the informed - it is governed by anyone who turns up. There are a small core of people who like playing wiki as an inhouse role-playing game and simply deny real-world consequences that might limit their freedom of action. There are a larger group who are too immature or lazy to think straight. And then there are all those who recognise "something must be done", but perpetually oppose the something that's being proposed in favour of a "better idea". The mechanism is rather like using a chatshow phone-in to manage the intricacies of a federal budget - it does not work for issues that need time, thought, responsibility and attention. I doubt this problem can be fixed - since it needs structural change to decision making - which is impossible for precisely the same reasons. | ” |
“ | In short there are too many idiots and too few people prepared to tell them to fuck off. And yes, that is precisely what we should tell them, because anything less encourages endless debates and Wikilawyering. Want to tell the world that Lance Armstrong takes drugs? Fuck off. At least until he has stopped successfully suing the newspapers for saying it. Want to tell the world about the evil world Jewish conspiracy? Fuck off, forever, and never even think about coming back. Want to tell the world how the scientists are all wrong? Fuck off - until it's in Nature, anyway. Want to out someone as a paedophile? Not here. Want to explain how 9/11 is a conspiracy and no plane crashed into the pentagon? Web space is cheap, get some of your own. | ” |
Note V:
The Misplaced Pages philosophy can be summed up thusly: "Experts are scum." For some reason people who spend 40 years learning everything they can about, say, the Peloponnesian War -- and indeed, advancing the body of human knowledge -- get all pissy when their contributions are edited away by Randy in Boise who heard somewhere that sword-wielding skeletons were involved. And they get downright irate when asked politely to engage in discourse with Randy until the sword-skeleton theory can be incorporated into the article without passing judgment.
— Lore Sjöberg
Note VI:
No Misplaced Pages editor may climb the Reichstag building dressed as Spider-Man in order to gain advantage in a content dispute. |
Note VII:
Hanlon's Razor | This user never attributes to malice that which is best explained by stupidity. |
Benford's Law | This user believes that passion is often inversely proportional to the amount of real information available. |
Okrent's Law | This user believes that the pursuit of balance can create imbalance because sometimes something is true. |
Note VIII:
Misplaced Pages has a policy of not calling people or groups "terrorist". This is not an indication of condoning "terrorist" activities, but of neutrality, and avoidance of passing judgment, affirming or denying. Please debate the merit of this policy at WT:Words to avoid, not here. |
Note IX:
Note X:
Brief quotations of copyrighted text may be used to illustrate a point, establish context, or attribute a point of view or idea.
— Wiki Quote Policy
Quotations are a fundamental attribute of Misplaced Pages. Quotes provide a direct source of information or insight. A brief excerpt can sometimes explain things better and less controversially than trying to do so ourselves.
— WP:QUOTE
Note XI:
= Don't Feed The Divas |
Note XII:
The future of Misplaced Pages ???
Note XIII:
A troll is a troll. |
Note XIV:
Misplaced Pages, which looks like a reference work to the average viewer, is in fact a bureaucracy given over mainly to arguing. The articles are the residue of the argument, being the last thing anyone declined to disagree about. — Clay Shirky, Here Comes Everybody, p. 279
Note XV:
Common fallacies (list) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Formal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Informal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note XVI: A few words on Wiki flaws
IP Edits
Widespread anonymity leads to a distinguishable problem, namely, the attractiveness of the project to people who merely want to cause trouble, or who want to undermine the project, or who want to change it into something that it is avowedly not – in other words, the troll problem.
— Larry Sanger, Misplaced Pages co-founder
3 RR
Many an edit war may seem like a fight over nothing to the casual observer, but considering that according to its staff, the popular, multilingual Web site gets about 7 billion views per month, stakes can be high. An edit yields what millions of people read on the site on any particular topic.
— San Francisco Weekly
Deletionists & "Taggers"
Still, a lot of good work—verifiable, informative, brain-leapingly strange — is being cast out of this paperless, infinitely expandable accordion folder by people who have a narrow, almost grade-schoolish notion of what sort of curiosity an on-line encyclopedia will be able to satisfy in the years to come ... There are some people on Misplaced Pages now who poke articles full of warnings and citation-needed notes and deletion prods till the topics go away.
— Nicholson Baker
Notability ?
To be notable, a Misplaced Pages topic must be "the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject and of each other." Although I have written or been quoted in such works, I can't say I've ever been the subject of any. And wouldn't you know, some notability cop cruised past my bio and pulled me over. Unless I get notable in a hurry — win the Nobel Peace Prize? Prove I sired Anna Nicole Smith's baby daughter? — a "sysop" (volunteer techie) will wipe my Misplaced Pages page clean. It's straight out of Philip K. Dick.
— Timothy Noah
Tip of the Day
Tip of the moment...
Create a user account
Create a user account, instead of contributing anonymously. Having an account gives you a fixed Misplaced Pages identity that other users will recognize, and upon which you can build a reputation. It also hides your IP address, so it is not as subject to IP tracing. There are lots of other benefits too: You can build a User page, and you acquire the right to be heard in votes and elections. User accounts have increased functionality, including the ability to create new articles, rename articles, upload images, edit semi-protected pages, and the use of some powerful tools. I would like to create an account now Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip Read more:Misplaced Pages:Why create an account? Become a Misplaced Pages tipster To add this auto-randomizing template to your user page, use {{totd-random}} |
The World at Night
RfA thanks!
RfA: Many thanks | ||
Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 06:13, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
Everyone likes praise
I admire the extraordinary work you have done on the (Che) article
— Taifarious1, June 5 2008
I just wanted to give ya a quick shout out and thank you for all the hard work you've been putting into the Che, The Argentine and Guerrilla articles.
— J.D. (talk) October 31 2008
Leave me a message below
Note:XVI (I do not archive discussions and delete them when they are no longer active or relevant)
|
Opinion about Che's paragraph
RT, I am waiting for your comment about the paragraph about the trials in order to implement the changes I suggested (or not). ;-) Cheers, Editor br (talk) 21:10, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Editor br, I appreciate your commitment to collaboration and am in the process of preparing a lengthy and detailed reply - which should be available in the next day or so. Thanks. Redthoreau (talk)RT 22:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ops, I did not check your Talk page, as I assumed you would answer in mine. I will revert my last edits and wait for your comments. Editor br (talk) 16:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Editor br please see my lengthy response, and take your time responding to it (No rush). Redthoreau (talk)RT 00:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment
Hi, Redthoreau. I'm just writing some comments at Talk:Che Guevara. Re "I'll try to contain my cynicism and believe that you are truly interested in actual investigation on the matter," It's good that you're making an effort to assume good faith. I suggest that it's more civil to keep those thoughts to yourself and phrase your comments as if you were having no difficulty assuming good faith. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 19:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)