re your attempted edits to ollies talk page Dlohcierekim, {{tl|db-self}} works best, it gives {{db-self}}--Jac16888 (talk) 23:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Constructive Critisism

I wish to bring to note the fact that you were involved in the deletion of a perfectly valid new article without giving any real reason. I would like to stress my feelings in a most polite but firm manner in saying that I strongly believe this was a welcome contribution. I will be expecting to see the return of the article entitled "Daffid's Epic Chin" and leave this duty in your hands as I feel I should not have to take care of this matter myself after spending my time in creating the informative article which I believe would have been in the interest of many readers. I would say to you that because of you, Misplaced Pages, as a whole, will be missing out on some vital and thought provoking information. Once again, I expect to see my article return in the very near future,

Yours Faithfully, Chegman (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

I have left Mr. Chegman a note on civility. And the "article" was obviously vandalism. — Satori Son 21:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

I would like to apologise to both Dlohcierekim and Satori Son for one particular line that I seem to have used in my original post. I may have been slightly annoyed by the unprompted deletion of the aforementioned article. I most definitely did not intend this as an attack as I was in the middle of changing the main offending line when I received the message from Satori Son. However, in sticking with the theme of my original post, I still believe that there was no sufficient explanation for the deletion of my article. I spent a considerable amount of time in composing that article, which, frankly, if I had known this would be the outcome I would have spent in doing something else which may have been appreciated. I also strongly protest to the fact that it has been dubbed as "Vandalism." I find this extremely hurtful as I wrote the article with the best of intentions to contribute towards this magnificent and ever-growing website, and having it, metaphorically speaking, "tossed aside" is rather upsetting. The statement in which I stated that I expect to see the return of the article still applies and I still leave this in your hands, which I am sure will prove entirely capable.

Yours Faithfully Chegman (talk) 21:56, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

My reply. Dlohcierekim 23:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Gabriel Ugliano restored

actually, not an attack page. Actually a fictional character. Dlohcierekim 02:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Ah, right, in that case I'm going to hide behind A1, not enough context to figure out the subject. Thanks for the undelete and fixup anyway. --fvw* 02:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

relevance of the marines article to James Zoll

In the article James Zoll, the cited page (www.dtic.mil/ndia/2005smallarms/agenda.pdf) was proving that he was in fact in the US army, and he was the chairman of the conference for military Weapons and Ammunition.

As for information on his musical career, I was about to edit that in when but it was deleted http://drzoll.webs.com/—Preceding unsigned comment added by Happyninjas (talk • contribs)

Castle Hotel, Halton

Saved; thanks for your speedy support. It sounds as if Runcorn has about the same population as Largo! If you want info about the grading system of our listed buildings it is included in Listed buildings in Runcorn, Cheshire which is currently a FLC. Or even more info from English Heritage. Best wishes. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Your are welcome. It was my pleasure. And thanks for the links. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 16:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Cool tools

See: User talk:Inclusionist#Cool Tools travb (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Notability is not confirmed on Danielle Fountain

I have to politely disagree with your call on changing the Speedy Delete on Danielle Fountain to a prod, based on your claim that there is an assertion of notability because of the article's claim that Ms. Fountain and her bandmates registered "over 3 million hits" on YouTube for their version of a song "Luv Addict" and "Decode." I just went to YouTube and ran checks to see these videos. These were the messages I received:

No videos found for “fufu luv addict”

No videos found for “fufu decode”

In view of this, it appears the original Speedy Delete request was justified and that assertion of notability is nonexistent. Thank you. Ecoleetage (talk) 20:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

PS It appears this may be a hoax, as a Google search of Danielle Fountain and Fufu turns up absolutely nothing: . Ecoleetage (talk) 20:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)