Revision as of 20:46, 11 January 2009 editDeepfriedokra (talk | contribs)Administrators173,451 edits lol← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:00, 13 January 2009 edit undoJuliancolton (talk | contribs)Administrators130,415 edits →Re: 5.999... approaches, but does not equal 6: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
I'm a moron. I thought I had checked and found it to be the first entry, which was why I was marking it for deletion. In any case, thanks! ~ ] (]) 20:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | I'm a moron. I thought I had checked and found it to be the first entry, which was why I was marking it for deletion. In any case, thanks! ~ ] (]) 20:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Not really. I've deleted articles that same way. We are not perfect. Cheers, ]] 20:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | :Not really. I've deleted articles that same way. We are not perfect. Cheers, ]] 20:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Re: 5.999... approaches, but does not equal 6 == | |||
Hmm, I was a bit confused at that. | |||
On a side note, that radar animation of Barry 07 on your userpage caught my eye. :) –] ] ] 00:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:00, 13 January 2009
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Archives
Vandalism is futile
Please understand that this userpage is frequently vandalized, and vandalism is reverted pretty quickly. You will not accomplish anything by vandalizing Misplaced Pages. If you wish to try test editing, you may do so in our sandbox located at Misplaced Pages:Sandbox or create a test subpage by putting "/test" after your username and clicking "create page." Thanks
Contacting me and the Messages
If you wish to contact me, the quickest and easiest way is to CLICK HERE.
If you have a question about a deleted article, please leave a message by CLICKING HERE.
You can also appeal a deletion by clicking this link to Deletion Review and following the directions found there.
Happy New Year!
Dear Dlohcierekim,
Wishing you a happy a new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.
Kind regards,
Majorly talk 20:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Lorrenzo Wade
Re: you message on the Lorrenzo Wade talk page ...
- Google News hits don't define notability. There are countless news articles about sports teams that identify members of the teams, even if they don't play in the game. That's just the way sports are reported. To define notability in sports, one needs several significant events, not just that a player played the sport. There are several discussions about WP:ATHLETE and sports notability at Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (athletes). Feel free to participate. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
AfD of Erin McCarley
An article that you have been involved in editing, Erin McCarley, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Erin McCarley. Thank you. CyberGhostface (talk) 17:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Jesse J. McCrary, Jr.
Already in the Category:Secretaries of State of Florida subcategory. Bearcat (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Message
Sorry I don't understand. If I try and revert a blanking by a page author, huggle will tell me to tag it for speedy deletion instead. Huggle did not so you must be mistaken. If I am wrong, please accept my apologies. Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 23:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think I understand. There was already a {{db-self}} template on the page, so when I reverted it went back to the version with the speedy deletion tag. Normally Huggle will ask if you want to add a deletion tag if the author blanked the page. You might know more about Huggle than me- it's not what usually happens. Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 23:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Must be a flaw with Huggle. WP:CSD#G7 allows for the creator to blank the page. It would not be appropriate to revert, with or without Huggle. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 23:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
re your attempted edits to ollies talk page Dlohcierekim, {{tl|db-self}} works best, it gives {{db-self}}--Jac16888 (talk) 23:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Constructive Critisism
I wish to bring to note the fact that you were involved in the deletion of a perfectly valid new article without giving any real reason. I would like to stress my feelings in a most polite but firm manner in saying that I strongly believe this was a welcome contribution. I will be expecting to see the return of the article entitled "Daffid's Epic Chin" and leave this duty in your hands as I feel I should not have to take care of this matter myself after spending my time in creating the informative article which I believe would have been in the interest of many readers. I would say to you that because of you, Misplaced Pages, as a whole, will be missing out on some vital and thought provoking information. Once again, I expect to see my article return in the very near future,
Yours Faithfully, Chegman (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have left Mr. Chegman a note on civility. And the "article" was obviously vandalism. — Satori Son 21:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- I would like to apologise to both Dlohcierekim and Satori Son for one particular line that I seem to have used in my original post. I may have been slightly annoyed by the unprompted deletion of the aforementioned article. I most definitely did not intend this as an attack as I was in the middle of changing the main offending line when I received the message from Satori Son. However, in sticking with the theme of my original post, I still believe that there was no sufficient explanation for the deletion of my article. I spent a considerable amount of time in composing that article, which, frankly, if I had known this would be the outcome I would have spent in doing something else which may have been appreciated. I also strongly protest to the fact that it has been dubbed as "Vandalism." I find this extremely hurtful as I wrote the article with the best of intentions to contribute towards this magnificent and ever-growing website, and having it, metaphorically speaking, "tossed aside" is rather upsetting. The statement in which I stated that I expect to see the return of the article still applies and I still leave this in your hands, which I am sure will prove entirely capable.
Yours Faithfully Chegman (talk) 21:56, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Gabriel Ugliano restored
actually, not an attack page. Actually a fictional character. Dlohcierekim 02:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, right, in that case I'm going to hide behind A1, not enough context to figure out the subject. Thanks for the undelete and fixup anyway. --fvw* 02:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
relevance of the marines article to James Zoll
In the article James Zoll, the cited page (www.dtic.mil/ndia/2005smallarms/agenda.pdf) was proving that he was in fact in the US army, and he was the chairman of the conference for military Weapons and Ammunition.
As for information on his musical career, I was about to edit that in when but it was deleted http://drzoll.webs.com/—Preceding unsigned comment added by Happyninjas (talk • contribs)
Castle Hotel, Halton
Saved; thanks for your speedy support. It sounds as if Runcorn has about the same population as Largo! If you want info about the grading system of our listed buildings it is included in Listed buildings in Runcorn, Cheshire which is currently a FLC. Or even more info from English Heritage. Best wishes. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Your are welcome. It was my pleasure. And thanks for the links. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 16:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Cool tools
See: User talk:Inclusionist#Cool Tools travb (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Notability is not confirmed on Danielle Fountain
I have to politely disagree with your call on changing the Speedy Delete on Danielle Fountain to a prod, based on your claim that there is an assertion of notability because of the article's claim that Ms. Fountain and her bandmates registered "over 3 million hits" on YouTube for their version of a song "Luv Addict" and "Decode." I just went to YouTube and ran checks to see these videos. These were the messages I received:
- No videos found for “fufu luv addict”
- No videos found for “fufu decode”
In view of this, it appears the original Speedy Delete request was justified and that assertion of notability is nonexistent. Thank you. Ecoleetage (talk) 20:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- PS It appears this may be a hoax, as a Google search of Danielle Fountain and Fufu turns up absolutely nothing: . In fact, nothing asserted about Danielle Fountain can be confirmed online. Something odd is afoot. Ecoleetage (talk) 20:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- PPS I have removed the prod tag and put up a G3. In view of the research I've done, I am convinced this is a blatant hoax. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- PS It appears this may be a hoax, as a Google search of Danielle Fountain and Fufu turns up absolutely nothing: . In fact, nothing asserted about Danielle Fountain can be confirmed online. Something odd is afoot. Ecoleetage (talk) 20:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your note. The interpretation of significance and notability is often subjective -- I saw the claims in the original text to be highly dubious, which is why I went for A7 rather than a prod. However, in digging deeper, I realised this article was a phony. I am glad that we were able to work together and have this taken off the site. As always, it is a pleasure to work with you. Ecoleetage (talk) 20:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Ecoleetage (talk) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!
Eight Days To Live
I'm a moron. I thought I had checked and found it to be the first entry, which was why I was marking it for deletion. In any case, thanks! ~ Parasane (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Not really. I've deleted articles that same way. We are not perfect. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 20:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: 5.999... approaches, but does not equal 6
Hmm, I was a bit confused at that.
On a side note, that radar animation of Barry 07 on your userpage caught my eye. :) –Juliancolton 00:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)