Revision as of 14:53, 21 January 2009 view sourcePdfpdf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users54,076 editsm fmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:00, 21 January 2009 view source Pdfpdf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users54,076 editsm →Poll: Perrig Quemeneur: pathetic attempt at humourNext edit → | ||
Line 638: | Line 638: | ||
* Both are same images –] (]) 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | * Both are same images –] (]) 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*1. <s>No, I changed my mind. Now 2</s>. Again 1.--'']] ]'' 05:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | *1. <s>No, I changed my mind. Now 2</s>. Again 1.--'']] ]'' 05:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
* |
*0. Hey Brewcrewer, what about #3?? (They all look constipated to me.) ] (]) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
=== Poll: ] - take 2 === | === Poll: ] - take 2 === |
Revision as of 15:00, 21 January 2009
This user is a cricket pundit for the Times of India, the world's largest distribution daily English language newspaper. Details/disclaimer This user is a cricket pundit for the Mint Wall Street Journal -You are welcome to leave me a message or request admin action.
Blnguyen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) has been an administrator since 29 May 2006 and an arbitrator since January 1, 2007.
FOR ANONS, I WILL DEFINITELY REPLY HERE. FOR EVERYBODY ELSE, THIS MAY BE HERE OR AT YOUR TALK PAGE. IF IT IS A MULTI-PARTY DISCUSSION, THEN DEFINITELY HERE
ArchivesUser:Blnguyen/box Archives roughly divided into 40kb chunks
- /Archive1: October 2005 - 2/3/06 (44kb)
- /Archive2: 3/3 - 23/3 (40kb)
- /Archive3: 23/3 - 7/4 (41kb)
- /Archive4: 7/4 - 2/5 (45kb)
- /Archive5: 2/5 - 18/5 (45kb)
- /Archive6: 19/5 - 26/5 (43kb)
- /Archive my RfA: separate archive regarding my RfA from 22-31/5
- /Archive7: 26/5 - 6/5 (45kb)
- /Archive8: 7/6 - 16/6 (43kb)
- /Archive9: 17/6 - 29/6 (42kb)
- /Archive10: 30/6 - 8/7 (40kb)
- /Archive11: 9/7 - 13/7 (40kb)
- /Archive12: 13/7 - 18/7 (42kb)
- /Archive13: 18/7 - 22/7 (42kb) (includes most of the Indian religion stuff, which started a while ago)
- /Archive14: 22/7 - 6/8 roughly 2006 (42kb)
- /Archive15: 6/8 - 16/8 (43kb)
- /Archive16: 7/8 - 10/8 (41kb) (separate for Indian religion hostilities)
- /Archive17: 10/8 - 17/8 (41kb) (separate for Indian religion hostilities)
- /Archive18: 16/8 - 23/8 (40kb)
- /Archivesurvey: for the religion survey
- /Archive19: 17/8 - 1/9(43kb) (separate for Indian religion hostilities + cucumber)
- /Archive20: 23/8 - 1/9 (40kb)
- /Archive21: 1/9 - 6/9 (40kb)
- /Archive22: 6/9 - 14/9 (40kb)
- /Archive23: 4/9 - (Balkan battles) (24kb)
- /Archive24: 4/9 - 22/9 (42kb) (general India disputes)
- /Archive25: 4/9 - 14/9 (52kb)(Karnataka vs Maharashtra)
- /Archive26: 15/9 - (general) (37kb)
- /Archive27: 20/9 - 29/9 (Karnataka vs Maharashtra part 2)
- /Archive28: 29/9 - 19/10 (40kb)
- /Archive29: 19/10 - 30/10 (40kb)
- /Archive30: 26/10 - 2/11 ?(Karnataka vs Maharashtra part 3)
- /Archive31: 1/11 - 8/11
- /Archive32: November 8
- /Archive33: November 17 - (India:Bodhidharma and Indian Buddhist Movement
- /Archive34: 21/11 - 28/11
- /Archive35: 28/11 - 12/12
- /Archive36: 12/12 - 28/12
- /Archive37: (Karnataka vs Maharashtra part 4)
- /Archive38:
- /Archive39:
- ....
- /Archive78:Cricket photo poll
- ....
- /Archive99:Olympics poll
- /Archive100:Olympics poll
Requests
- Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park - Genghiskhanviet (talk · contribs)
- Economy of the Republic of Vietnam - Genghiskhanviet (talk · contribs)
- Michigan State University Group - Kevin Forsyth (talk · contribs)
- Nguyen Tri Phuong - Magnifier (talk · contribs)
- Phan Thanh Gian - Magnifier (talk · contribs)
- Vietnam War - Wandalstouring (talk · contribs)
- Cyril de Zoysa - Pectore (talk · contribs)
- User:Garden/WikiCup
Checkuser and sockpuppetry
Hey there! Can you tell whether or not 86.69.135.61 is Ekky or this Frampton fellow? (Hm, forgot to sign!) Dan (talk) 08:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- IP traces to France. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 01:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Straw poll for selecting photos of cyclists at the 2009 Tour Down Under
Photos were taken at the team parade at the start of the 2009 Tour Down Under, January 18, 2008.
They were all very gentlemanly. Very dignified and genial. So were the crowd. Apart from the middle-aged man who stood net to the YellowMonkey and intentionally jabbed him in the ribs for about an hour. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
The crowd favourites, judged by the decibel level of the applause, were in no particular order, Armstrong, Hincapie, Pereiro, Greipel, Voigt, O'Grady, Michael Rogers, McEwen, Baden Cooke, Bobridge (local boy). YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Voting section
Simply vote and comment as follows below the individual sections.
- Comment (numbering pictures from 1, 2, 3 etc, left to right) and ~~~~
Poll: Aaron Kemps
- No. 1 background less distracting. Could use slight cropping at right to eliminate red. Durova 06:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Number 1 -- Samir 06:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Ironholds (talk) 08:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 0.
*1. (per Durova.) Pdfpdf (talk) 09:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)re Brewcrewer. LOL! Yes, now that you mention it ... Pdfpdf (talk) 22:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC) - 2. Looks a little less constipated. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- (1) - Agree with Durova that some minor cropping might be in order though. Cirt (talk) 02:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 is better -- Tinu Cherian - 06:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Adam Hansen
- No. 1 Best lighting and contrast, most active pose. Durova 06:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Number 1 -- Samir 07:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. per Durova. Ironholds (talk) 08:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. ditto. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 5. The nicest smile. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 - I like the activity in it. Cirt (talk) 02:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 the best by far Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Adri van Houwelingen
- Number 2 -- Samir 07:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2 full face rather than profile. Durova 07:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Ironholds (talk) 08:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. per Durova Pdfpdf (talk) 09:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Looks less worried. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - Better to have the full face. Cirt (talk) 02:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 front is better than side Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Aitor Hernandez
- Number 2 -- Samir 07:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2. Better lighting and contrast, more active pose. Durova 07:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Ironholds (talk) 08:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. per Durova Pdfpdf (talk) 09:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Raised hand looks awkward. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - Though it is a bit tall of an image, I like the activity in it. Cirt (talk) 02:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 - Dimensions of 2 are distracting Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2, but, because of the proportions, I would cut it a little bit at the top (until the hand) and at the bottom. --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Alan Peiper
Alan Peiper is was a redlink on Team Columbia-High Road, Tour of Sweden, 1991 Ronde van Nederland, 1992 Tour de France and a dozen other pages, but thanks to swift action by the Yellow Monkey, this is no longer the case!
- No. 2 better view of the face. Durova 07:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Number 2 (no sunglasses) -- Samir 07:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 0. neither Pdfpdf (talk) 09:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Per above. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - Though it could use a bit of minor cropping for centering/framing. Cirt (talk) 02:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 although it's close Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Alexander Efimkin
- No. 1 Better lighting and contrast. Durova 07:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Well yes, but the poor guy looks miserable! Pdfpdf (talk) 13:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Number 1 -- Samir 07:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Per Durova. Not necessarily miserable, might just be tough guy pose. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 - The other one is a bit too bright. Cirt (talk) 02:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 - Don't much like his smile. Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Alexandr Pliuschin
- No. 2 close call. Durova 07:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Number 2 -- Samir 07:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- No real difference... Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Slightly less lip-quivering. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 - Agree with Brewcrewer (talk · contribs) on this one. Cirt (talk) 02:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Alexandre Pichot
- No. 2 better lighting. Durova 07:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Number 2, less glare -- Samir 07:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per above. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 21:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - Less awkward expression. Cirt (talk) 02:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Don't like the expression on 2 Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Aliaksandr Kuchynski
- No. 1 Better view of the face, more relaxed pose. Durova 07:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Number 1 -- Samir 07:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Looks snarky in the other one. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 - Could be centered a tad better though. Cirt (talk) 02:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- definitely 1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Alexandre Usov
aka Aliaksandr Usau, Aliaksandre Usau, Alexander Usov, but NOT Aleksandr Usov
- No. 2. 3 has the best lighting overall, but this shows his eyes a little better and I prefer the pose. Durova 07:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Number 4 -- Samir 07:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Less blurry then 4. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - Best expression. Cirt (talk) 02:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Allan Davis
- No. 3 Might want to crop the bottom a little to reduce the prominence of blown whites. Durova 07:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Number 2 -- Samir 07:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. per Durova Pdfpdf (talk) 09:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Close second place to #2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. No way 3. What the hell is so funny? 1 is a frontal so it edges out 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 - 1 has some minor obscuring w/ the microphone. Cirt (talk) 02:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Anders Lund
- Number 1, better contrast -- Samir 07:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 1 but needs tighter cropping to eliminate the flanking figures. Durova 07:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. It's an inferior picture but his smile is far better in this one. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 - The other one is a bit bright. Cirt (talk) 02:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - too much obstruction on 1 Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Andre Greipel
- No. 4 best view of the face. Durova 07:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. better pose & expression. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Per Pdfpdf.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. per Brewcrewer (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 Bastique 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Andrea Grendene
- No. 1 Better view of the face. Durova 07:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. per Brewcrewer (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 02:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Lance Armstrong and Paul Sherwen
- No. 1 Better view of the face. Durova 07:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 (for both) per above. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 - The other one is a bit dark. Cirt (talk) 02:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Bernhard Eisel
- No. 2 Best lighting and composition. Durova 15:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Wow! He's a hottie. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - This is definitely the best one. Cirt (talk) 02:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Cameron Meyer
- No. 2 tossup; not crazy about either. Durova 16:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Not crazy about either but have a strong aversion to semi-constipated looks. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - 2 is the better of these. Cirt (talk) 02:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Christopher Sutton (cyclist)
- perhaps 2? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2 better lighting and facial expression. Durova 16:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Looks weird in 1 and snarky in 2. Toss up. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - The expression is better on this one. Cirt (talk) 02:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Christian Guiberteau
- No. 2 better view of the face. Durova 21:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per above, and those sideburns take the cake. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - per Brewcrewer (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 03:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Christian Knees
- No. 2, better view of the face. Suggest cropping the sunlight out of the bottom and doing an auto levels. Durova 21:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Looks weird in the other one.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 - Better expression. Cirt (talk) 03:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 1 per above. Durova
Poll: Claudio Corioni
- 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 edges out 3. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - per Brewcrewer (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 03:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2 if blown whites are cropped out. Durova 03:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Daniele Nardello
- 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Neither. He's better looking then both pics. How about this one?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 is the best. Cirt (talk) 03:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2 better facial expression. Durova 04:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: David Loosli
- 2 - Best expression of the three. Cirt (talk) 03:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Toss up between 2 and 3. The latter is a better pic but he looks better in the former. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 3 best view of the eyes. Durova 05:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Davide Malacarne
- 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - Best framing of the bunch. Cirt (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. don't like the smile in 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 4 eyes open, less harsh profile than 1 or 2. Durova 05:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Davide Vigano
- 4 - Best full expression and view of face. Cirt (talk) 03:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 4 per above. Durova 05:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Dries Devenyns
- 3 - I like the expression the best on this one. Cirt (talk) 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 3 best lighting and best view of face. Durova 05:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Ermanno Capelli
- 4. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 - Best expression of the bunch. Cirt (talk) 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. no-brainer. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 4 easy call. Durova 05:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Francesco Chicchi
- 1 - Best framing, centering, and expression. Cirt (talk) 03:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 1 Only one where his face is visible and not scowling. Durova 05:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Francesco Reda
- 2 - Face is less scrunchy in this one. Cirt (talk) 03:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2 per above. Durova 05:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Francis van Londersele
- 2 - But might want to crop to just the head/shoulders, the hand is a bit bright/blurry. Cirt (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 1 Less open expression, but better lighting and focus. Durova 05:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Frank Hoj
- 2 - Looks confident in this one. Cirt (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Frontal.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2 per above. Durova 05:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Frederick Willems
- 1. Although 3 is a better pic, he looks better in 1. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2 the only one with tolerably even lighting. Durova 05:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: George Hincapie
- 4. Although there's a hint of a smile in 3, 4 is brighter. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 3 more dynamic composition, better facial expression. Durova 05:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Gert Steegmans
- 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. frontal.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 1 best view of face. Durova 05:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Gianni da Ros
- 1. Close call, but looks a bit funny in 2 and has too much armor in 3--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 3 going against the flow here and picking the shot with sunglasses. Although it shows less of the face, the lighting, composition, and color balance is far superior to either alternative. Durova 05:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Graeme Brown
- 2. duh. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2 more professional. Durova 05:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Greg Henderson
- 3. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 3 Wish you had been standing four feet to the right for this shot. Durova 05:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Guillaume Blot
- 1. Although 2 is a better pic, it looks like he came in last place.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2 better composition and brightness. Durova 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Henrik Redant
- 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 1 prefer the composition. Close call between all 3 choices. Durova 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Hilton Clarke
- 3? Pdfpdf (talk) 09:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Best smile. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Hubert Schwab
Poll: Imanol Erviti
Poll: Inaki Isasi
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Ivan Dominquez
Poll: Jacopo Guarnieri
Poll: Javier Megias
- 2? Pdfpdf (talk) 22:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jeremy Roy
Poll: Jesus Hernandez
Poll: Jos van Emden
Poll: Jose Luis Rubiera
- Strange "hat". Is it some form of helmet? Pdfpdf (talk) 22:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1, I guess.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jose Rojas
Poll: Josu Larrazabal
- 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Juan Horrach
- 1, I guess.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Julian Dean
Poll: Julien el Fares
- 1. Nicer smile.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jussi Veikkanen
Poll: Kai Reus
- 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1, then 4. Don't like 2; too much crotch prominence.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm. I hadn't noticed - I was looking at the top 2/3 of the picture ... Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Kasper Klostergaard
Poll: Kenny de Hayes
- 3. Don't like the weird look in 1 and the faraway look in 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Kym Dillon
Poll: Lance Armstrong
- 2 Not picking anything in his face! Bastique
- 2. First guy here that I heard of.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Laurent Biondi
Poll: Laurent Lefevre
- 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. #1 might be placed here.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Luca Barla
Poll: Luis Leon Sanchez
- 3 is wee clearer then 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Maciej Bodnar
- 1 Bastique
- 1. The other at Traffic Cops.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mario Aerts
- 2. (However, the lass in #1 has a nice smile ... ) Pdfpdf (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Bastique
- 1. Hello! Are you guys blind? Did you not notice the person behind him?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pardon? What did you think "(However, the lass in #1 has a nice smile ... )" was about? Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mark Renshaw
- 2 better lighting, pose Bastique
- 2 per above. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Markus Eichler
- 2 better quality Bastique
- 2. The other pic might be placed here.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Martin Elmiger
- 2 Bastique
- 2 notwithstanding the microphone, it's clearer. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Martin Muller
- 2 Both are good but the lighting is better in 2 than 1 Bastique
- 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mathew Hayman
- 3 Best expression Bastique 03:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. I actually suspect his expression doesn't really change. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mathieu Drujon
- 1 Great smile Bastique 03:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Matteo Bono
- 2 Obstruction in 1 Bastique 03:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Don't like the teeth-situation in 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Matteo Tosatto
- 3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 Great shot --Bastique 03:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Looks better in this one.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Matthew Goss
- 2 1 is better quality but that tongue ruins it. Bastique 03:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per above. 1 might be more a good pic for this article.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Matt White (cyclist)
- 1 Dimensions are terrible on 2. Bastique 03:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- This guy obviously does not like yellow monkeys.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Maxim Iglinskiy
- 2 Bastique 03:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. The other is too in-your-face.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Michael Rogers
- 1. It is a different pose from nearly all the others. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. This is a wonderful shot. Bastique 03:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mickael Buffaz
- 1 Best expression. Bastique 03:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Nicki Sorensen
- 3 best expression Bastique 03:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Nicolas Portal
- 3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Best face shot. Bastique 03:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Toss up. Looks better in 1 but 3 is a better pic.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Nicolas Roche
- 1 better lighting of the two Bastique 03:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Baseball cap hides too much of the other one.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Nikolay Trusov
- 2 Eyes are closed in 1 Bastique 03:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Oscar Pereiro
- 3 Bastique 03:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3, but I would erase that terrible vertical line with Gimp or Photoshop.--Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Pablo Lastras
- 1 Bastique 03:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, 1 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Paul Sherwen
Poll: Perrig Quemeneur
- Both are same images –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1.
No, I changed my mind. Now 2. Again 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC) - 0. Hey Brewcrewer, what about #3?? (They all look constipated to me.) Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Perrig Quemeneur - take 2
- Hmmm. Hard one. Either #0 or #2 Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Pieter Jacobs
- 3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Rein Taaramae
- Don't like either, but 2 might be good for Cracking joints.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Phil Liggett
- 2–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Remy di Gregorio
- 2–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. The other at overbite.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Rene Mandri
- 2–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Rick Flens
- 2 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Ronny Scholz
- 3 Although the background it too bright, the profile and smile are nicer.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Rony Martias
- 1. Less scrunchy.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Scott Davis (cyclist)
- 0. Don't like either much, but both are MUCH better the the photo on Scott Davis (cyclist)!! Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- (And what's he doing using our Scott's name?!) Pdfpdf (talk) 09:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Sean Yates
Poll: Sergey Klimov
Poll: Sergio de Lis
Poll: Stef Clement
Poll: Thierry Bricaud
Poll: Thomas Rohregger
Poll: Timmy Duggan
Poll: Timothy Gudsell
Poll: Tom Leezer
Poll: Travis Meyer
Poll: Vitaliy Buts
- 1 (cropped) –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Vittorio Algeri
Poll: Volodymyr Zagorodniy
Poll: Wesley Sulzberger
Poll: Willem Stroetinga
- Number 1 -- Samir 07:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: William Walker
- Number 1 -- Samir 07:18, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Yoann Offredo
- Number 2 -- Samir 07:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Invincibles issues
Other stuff
email-ekky
Hi Yellow, did you get my mail about the socking on English Qaballa and related articles? It's our mate back again. He was blocked on the IP range 209 something something, now his IP must've changed by a few didgits but it's clearly the same IP/person, just a permutation of it. There are some others of his I think, and also some of indef'ed User:EdwardLeeFrampton, clearly him as he was only here to praise a particular book, and these IPs are doing the same. Then User:QuaBobAllah or however it's spelt, aka Ekajati, reverts him, which is what he was doing, and pushes the particular POV he favours. Some of the IPs of course are coming from the same city from which we know he edits sometimes/resides. Sticky Parkin 14:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Bill Johnston (cricketer)
Hi, we've met before, I'm the guy sweeping the sportsperson GAs and we spoke about several articles sometime back. I've come to the above article (which I meant to do earlier, sorry) which I had flagged as a probable pass and have found it scattered with arbitrary tags: is there a reason for this and are you able to deal with them? (i.e. delete the uneccessary ones and fill those that need filling). Apart from that, the article's only problem is an untidy "Life after cricket" section, which needs forming into one or two sensible paragraphs and then it will be good enough to pass GA again. Thanks--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Coming. I put it there to remind myself and forgot. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi
Hi yellow monkey, i just want to tell you a tip that can you arrange your archieves on your talk page to be more arranged? I can't read it well. Cheers! C H J L 09:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Feel free to just intervent and do whatever it is that makes it more legible for you. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, you are so nice. Thanks for your attention. Cheers! C H J L 07:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Donald Bradman with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948 GA Review
Very good article. Thanks for doing it. Great idea. I've made some comments at Talk:Donald Bradman with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948/GA1 and left it on hold. I'll pop back to the review now and again to see what's happening. If you have any queries you want to raise quickly with me, ping my talkpage. Regards SilkTork * 13:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks for your attention. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Donald Bradman with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Donald Bradman with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Neil Harvey with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Neil Harvey with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Bill Brown with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bill Brown with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Sid Barnes with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sid Barnes with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Sam Loxton with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sam Loxton with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Lindsay Hassett with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lindsay Hassett with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for First Test, 1948 Ashes series
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article First Test, 1948 Ashes series, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Second Test, 1948 Ashes series
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Second Test, 1948 Ashes series, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Third Test, 1948 Ashes series
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Third Test, 1948 Ashes series, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Fourth Test, 1948 Ashes series
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fourth Test, 1948 Ashes series, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Barnstars
Barnstar #1
The Surreal Barnstar | ||
For having ten DYK's in one hook which is a new record in Misplaced Pages, I award you this Barnstar. Chris (talk) 21:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC) |
- It's certainly a record, but I count 11. He hasn't been credited for Johnson... Lampman (talk) 22:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
On January 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ian Johnson with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Listing myself. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar #2
The Running Man Barnstar | ||
For your work on Australian cricket articles. All I can say is WOW. Chris (talk) 21:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC) |
Thankyou, kind sir, it actually didn't take as long as it would because of the overlap in the topics, but a month of Misplaced Pages nevertheless. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Tour Down Under
Were you there yesterday? I snapped them all! YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well done! When you have them loaded up, please send me the link. Which location(s) were you at?
- No, I wasn't there - I was busy being domestic, clearing gutters and putting in fireproof metal gutter-guard. (The plastic stuff is much easier to work with, but not very useful in a fire - it makes me wonder about plastic rainwater tanks ... )
- BTW: 2009 Tour Down Under only mentions 20-25 Jan - perhaps you may wish to add a "pre-event" section?
- Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 01:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- At Rymill Park. They got all the teams to line up on stage and that made it relatively easy although the blazing sun and the sunshade made an odd effect where their faces were relatively dark and their torsos and jerseys were glary so that was quite annoying. The race proper starts tomorrow. This was like the prologue and didn't count for anything. I take it you like in the hills where there is a fire danger? Take care for you and your family. I can't say I was in much danger yesterday, except the middle-aged man standing next to me in the second row wanted more than 30 cm radius of room (which nobody had, I had a news cameraman perching his stuff on my head at one point) and he kept on sticking out his elbows and jabbing me in the ribs trying to be get rid of me and mumbling his displeasure. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 02:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Replied on my page. Pdfpdf (talk) 02:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm ashamed to admit I didn't even think of going - I should have. :) I'll need to remember to try and attend big events too, and grab what photos I can. But yours look great. :) - Bilby (talk) 07:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- By-the-way: How/when did you wrap up the previous poll, what was/were the result(s), and how did you / are you going to use the results? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 08:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
re: Dispute
Hi YellowMonkey. I have partially replied to your query here, but I'll add some occurences of our disputes here. Talk:Francis Hassett/References is the example I was referring to when he was adding OR medals and references that violated WP:VER, and it ended up quite heated. Another (Talk:Neville Howse) where I disputed the entitlement to a medal, he disputed it (angrily) and it ended up that I was right (after another heated debate). Another calling me wrong about a person not being entitled to a certain medal when it turned out I was right there also. These are only a few examples I can think of, and I'm not here to say that "it's all his fault, here's the proof", just give you some examples that we have had a few arguments in the past. I know that in a few instances (Hassett's for example) I have not behaved well, but I'm just sick of it all and having a lot of my edits questioned. The main reason, also, that I was ticked off over the VC see also thing was that it was like I had just told a child who was doing the wrong thing (I'm not calling Anotherclown a child, of course, just the comparision works here) that he was in fact doing wrong, and then Pdf coming along and saying to the child keep doing it. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 05:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey
For sure, I will have a look through! Not sure if Notorious is out yet in Australia, but if you are bored, go and see it; it'll explain my not-so-subtle nickname for you. Hope things are well dude -- Samir 05:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
You
I still feel immensely beholden to you for tracking down the sock puppets that had been after me for seven months (Starwood arbitration, to refresh your memory). I would do more in copy editing your articles if cricket were not so over my head. I know you are a wonderful wikiperson. And, I want to thank you again for what you did for me, though I'm sure that was not your motivation. I think it was you, who made the sardonic remarks in relation to one of the sockpuppets who had claimed to be a waitress in Dublin, but was now suddenly in a car traveling to Austin, Texas, sharing a laptop with another sockpuppet, as an explanation for the overlapping edits. Thank you again. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 05:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
GeorgeNotBungle
I suspect GeorgeNotBungle (talk · contribs · logs) is a sock of Elcidd (talk · contribs · logs). Please check. --KnowledgeHegemony 18:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Different countries, not the same user. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 00:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
pics
Hey, I noticed your invitation to vote on some talkpage somewhere and decided to crash. Wonder how it feels to have a perpetual orange bar at the top of your pages. Do you have any pics of the better sex? Voting on dudes is less titillating, and I come to WP to get titillated :-) --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: GAN
Oops, I forgot to reply to you to thank you for pointing out the problem which you saw in the articles. :) I am not really fussed if they pass GAN or not, but I figured if they're already close to that level they may as well get the right rating. And if they're not, then, meh, I did my best on them. - Mark 04:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: Ron Halcombe
I'll get to reviewing it tomorrow. I signed up for several at the same time, which was probably dumb since it slowed me down. since the article's not too lengthy it shouldn't take too much time (the other one I'm reviewing is 100kb+). Wizardman 05:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Military career of Keith Miller
Hello, have you noticed that the Australian War Memorial's online collection database has about a dozen good quality PD photos of Keith Miller playing with the RAAF team in 1945? Nick-D (talk) 07:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Islamic Inventions
Hello. Sorry, saw your entry on my talk page just now. Do not know about any other articles such as these two, but I have seen that user now for over a year copying and pasting badly researched and consistently one-sided material in all kinds of articles. He has over 40,000 edits, so you know...I think his consistent misquotation and overinterpretation of sources has brought POV to a new level in Misplaced Pages, because people tend to believe in assertions more if thez are backed up by a footnote. They are less prone to assume that the information is taken out of context or subtly modified to suit fix preconceptions. Thats why it has been so hard to come this new method. It needs hundreds of footnotes to be checked and most third party observers do not have the time, nor the interest to completely rewrite articles which were written wrongly from the scratch. A case in point is Talk:Inventions of the Islamic Golden Age. The net result is that, while many believe the article to be POV and have tried to improve it, many dubious assertions are still there and spread their message.
PS: Just checked again Timeline of historic inventions. It is hard to find a single uncontested invention there. Too many lists just lack information to the contrary. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)