Revision as of 23:23, 24 January 2009 editPeeJay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers208,795 edits Gerard Piqué | Revision as of 13:50, 25 January 2009 edit undoPeeJay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers208,795 edits →Gerard Piqué: uw-3rrNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I have started a discussion with regard to your edits to the ] article at ]. Your contributions would be much appreciated. – ]] 23:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | I have started a discussion with regard to your edits to the ] article at ]. Your contributions would be much appreciated. – ]] 23:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Gerard Piqué|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> – ]] 13:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:50, 25 January 2009
Gerard Piqué
I have started a discussion with regard to your edits to the Gerard Piqué article at Talk:Gerard Piqué. Your contributions would be much appreciated. – PeeJay 23:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gerard Piqué. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. – PeeJay 13:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)