| Revision as of 13:35, 26 January 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 21d) to User talk:Eleland/Archive14.← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:35, 26 January 2009 edit undoTiamut (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,614 edits →January 2009Next edit → | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
| <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:2 weeks|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:repeated severe incivility in a dispute about content in the article ]; see the ] discussion|'''repeated severe incivility in a dispute about content in the article ]; see the ] discussion'''|repeated ]}}. You are welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:true|<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> | <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:2 weeks|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:repeated severe incivility in a dispute about content in the article ]; see the ] discussion|'''repeated severe incivility in a dispute about content in the article ]; see the ] discussion'''|repeated ]}}. You are welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:true|<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> | ||
| Oh God! What the hell is the matter with people here? Admins go around violating BLP for months with no consequences, while those who lose patience with them and tell them where to go get blocked? Everywhere in the world it seems the law fucks the poor, weak and marginalized and supports the already rich and powerful. One would have thought a people's encyclopedia would be different. | |||
| I see Wehwalt has removed the BLP notice from his talk page. It seems that he enjoys patrolling the pages of pro-Palestinian activists (see ] for another example of where his ownsership tendencies are quite clear). I voted against his admin nom a couple of months ago because I was concerned by his edits there. It seems my concerns and those of NSH001 were well placed, though ignored by others afraid of being sucked into I-P issues. Oh well. | |||
| Anyway Eleland, I hope you don't get discouraged. I was blocked four times for 3RR before learning how not to let the edit-warring bad faith socks before me draw me into those kinds of battles. In the future, when you feel the need to vent, I recommend my ] where Nishidani and I share our neuroses and plaints so as to be able to get on with editing without getting sucked into the penalty box. | |||
| Be well my friend. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:35, 26 January 2009
You are invited to look at my user page, where I am making an attempt to start a new article on Money and the Money Supply. Your advice and suggestions are invited Martycarbone (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Middle East Textbooks Invitation
|
WikiProject Middle East Textbooks is looking for editors to create, expand, and maintain complete, accurate, and neutral articles on school textbooks used throughout the Middle East, with a focus on textbook controversies and textbook analyses. You can start by simply adding your name to the list of members at WikiProject Middle East Textbooks. |
WP:AE#User:Jaakobou, fresh off a one-week topic-ban, on a rampage again
Just thought you might like to know... Cheers, pedro gonnet - talk - 28.03.2008 09:09
New AS mediation
The mediation im getting rolling as its been a long time waiting so i think its best to get moving. Most of the mediation will be on the talk (discussion) page. so make sure its in your watchlist. Seddon69 (talk)
todo: Abdulkarim al-Khaiwani
.
Happy holidays
Toddst1 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
On difference between neutral and "neutral" POVs, or subtle joy of quotes placement
Regarding one of your edits in Free Gaza Movement: placing of quotes for anti-terror NGO Shurat HaDin. You are certainly entitled to your opinion of said NGO and you can provide substantiated information to the point in respective article, however your innuendo to the perceived character of this NGO called by you "anti-terror" in article on Free Gaza Movement seems to be misplaced and (in my view) betrays "objective" rather than objective approach. Suggesting to unquote the "anti-terror" applied to Shurat HaDin in Free Gaza Movement; then please feel free to get to the substance in Shurat HaDin article. DBWikis (talk) 14:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
On tautology, or equivalence of "claiming assertion" and "assertion" when applied to legal statement.
Regarding one of your edits in Shebaa farms: your suggested wording of Israeli "claimed annexation" as compared to "annexation". Indeed any "claim of fact" is different from "fact" when applied to say material object, or matter that pertains to objective property, e.g. your "claim of objectivity" is not same as your objectivity since it can be perceived and assessed by external parties; however if the point in question is subjective or legal per definition then "claim of entering a state" means simply "entering a state", e.g. your "claim of feeling frustrated" should mean you are feeling frustrated. Likewise, "claim of annexation" means annexation de-jure. It can be unrecognized (as in case of Golan) and condemned, but as of today it exists both de-jure and de-facto. Your point of underscoring the disputed character of said annexation is understood and taken, however your proposed substitution of word "annexed" by wording "claimed as annexed" is simply tautological. DBWikis (talk) 14:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Some Info for WikiProject Palestine
The recent changes that I made to the UN Partition Plan for Palestine did quote solid academic sources. Oddly enough the 'Arab' propaganda that got deleted was written by the Jewish Agency's advisors on international law, or other Jewish jurists.
You might find some useful information in my notes:
User talk:Harlan wilkerson/UN Partition Plan
User talk:Harlan wilkerson/Non-Sovereign States
harlan (talk) 18:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Civility
I suggest you consider well the civility that each editor ought to extend to each other, and avoid provocative comments on talk pages and edit summaries which are not used for the purpose intended. You'll do better here. Just a suggestion.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- How about this: fuck off. Just a suggestion. <eleland/talkedits> 00:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Nice block log you got there. Five priors, and edit warring and 2x incivility. Hmmmm. Of course, I wouldn't block you myself, not proper, but jeez, keep it up on I-P articles, and you'll be having plenty of spare time.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Eleland, you know that's not okay. I started a thread at Wiquette here. IronDuke 00:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Now at AN/I
FYI, discussion now on AN/I --Onorem♠Dil 02:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009
Oh God! What the hell is the matter with people here? Admins go around violating BLP for months with no consequences, while those who lose patience with them and tell them where to go get blocked? Everywhere in the world it seems the law fucks the poor, weak and marginalized and supports the already rich and powerful. One would have thought a people's encyclopedia would be different.
I see Wehwalt has removed the BLP notice from his talk page. It seems that he enjoys patrolling the pages of pro-Palestinian activists (see Rachel Corrie for another example of where his ownsership tendencies are quite clear). I voted against his admin nom a couple of months ago because I was concerned by his edits there. It seems my concerns and those of NSH001 were well placed, though ignored by others afraid of being sucked into I-P issues. Oh well.
Anyway Eleland, I hope you don't get discouraged. I was blocked four times for 3RR before learning how not to let the edit-warring bad faith socks before me draw me into those kinds of battles. In the future, when you feel the need to vent, I recommend my User talk:Tiamut/Archive 9 where Nishidani and I share our neuroses and plaints so as to be able to get on with editing without getting sucked into the penalty box.
Be well my friend. Tiamut 14:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC)