Misplaced Pages

User:Raul654/GoRight: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Raul654 Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:04, 2 February 2009 view sourceRaul654 (talk | contribs)70,896 edits Revert warring← Previous edit Revision as of 20:11, 2 February 2009 view source GoRight (talk | contribs)6,435 edits Revert warring: - As long as you are going to keep this log, I might as well keep my notes here too.Next edit →
Line 28: Line 28:
* The Deniers, January 9, * The Deniers, January 9,
* Reverting warring to include a misquotation (which was originally added by a Scibaby sock) on the ] article * Reverting warring to include a misquotation (which was originally added by a Scibaby sock) on the ] article
:: GoRight - A good faith edit using a secondary ]. Removal of properly sourced material is disruptive. --] (]) 20:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


==Misinterpreting Misplaced Pages policy== ==Misinterpreting Misplaced Pages policy==

Revision as of 20:11, 2 February 2009

Evidence pertaining to GoRight's behavior since his RFC and institution of the community ban, for possible use in an RFC or Arbitration case pertaining to GoRight's disruptive conduct.

Hitlists

Fomenting edit wars

  • (James Hansen, August 19)
  • {{fact}} bombing the Global warming FAQ - (including one for a statement that greenland is covered in ice)
  • Using false BLP claims to whitewash Robert M. Carter
  • The Deniers, Jaunary 9,

Original research

  • Attempting to remove a statement sourced to a peer reviewed pub-med journal based on his own original research -

Canvassing

Wikilawyering

  • Arguing about the procedures for imposing the community ban -
  • Arguing about the scope of his ban -
  • Arguing about whether or not his reverts were actually reverts -
  • Arguing against a properly applied community ban on Rothwell ("My thought is that you're wikilawyering excessively." - Jehochman)

Revert warring

During the ANI community ban discussion, GoRight claimed he would in the future adhere to a 1rr. This was a lie designed to make people more sympathetic to him and less likely to support the community ban:

  • James Hansen, August 19, 1 2
  • The Deniers, January 9, 1 2
  • Reverting warring to include a misquotation (which was originally added by a Scibaby sock) on the James Hansen article
GoRight - A good faith edit using a secondary WP:RS. Removal of properly sourced material is disruptive. --GoRight (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Misinterpreting Misplaced Pages policy

Political back-scratching

Using talk pages as soap-boxes

NPOV violations

BLP violations

Sockpuppetry?

  • user:LFOD - sockpuppet pops up in the middle of GoRight's ANI discussion to defend him (sockmaster unknown)

Miscellaneous dickery