Revision as of 22:46, 21 February 2009 editKuru (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators205,078 edits decline unblock← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:47, 21 February 2009 edit undoLuna Santin (talk | contribs)65,325 edits moreNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unblock reviewed|1=What exactly am I supposed to say here? Unblock me? Since I was suddenly blocked without anyone explaining it to me, it's a bit hard to defend myself...It might be related to that sock puppet accusation, but the CheckUser was declined...Doesn't that mean the accusation was wrong? The person who declined it said something about "ducks", but I'm not really sure what he meant. I make three edits, get harassed by some fruit loop, and now I'm banned all of a sudden? How do I go about getting this undone so I can resume my editing?|decline=Requests with personal attacks will not be considered. The word "ducks" was clearly linked to a page explaining the usage of the term. ] ] 22:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=What exactly am I supposed to say here? Unblock me? Since I was suddenly blocked without anyone explaining it to me, it's a bit hard to defend myself...It might be related to that sock puppet accusation, but the CheckUser was declined...Doesn't that mean the accusation was wrong? The person who declined it said something about "ducks", but I'm not really sure what he meant. I make three edits, get harassed by some fruit loop, and now I'm banned all of a sudden? How do I go about getting this undone so I can resume my editing?|decline=Requests with personal attacks will not be considered. The word "ducks" was clearly linked to a page explaining the usage of the term. ] ] 22:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)}} | ||
:Really, FoJ, you're better off giving up already. Your socks are transparently obvious; either knock it off or request unblocking honestly. – <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 22:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:47, 21 February 2009
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).La Harle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What exactly am I supposed to say here? Unblock me? Since I was suddenly blocked without anyone explaining it to me, it's a bit hard to defend myself...It might be related to that sock puppet accusation, but the CheckUser was declined...Doesn't that mean the accusation was wrong? The person who declined it said something about "ducks", but I'm not really sure what he meant. I make three edits, get harassed by some fruit loop, and now I'm banned all of a sudden? How do I go about getting this undone so I can resume my editing?
Decline reason:
Requests with personal attacks will not be considered. The word "ducks" was clearly linked to a page explaining the usage of the term. Kuru 22:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Really, FoJ, you're better off giving up already. Your socks are transparently obvious; either knock it off or request unblocking honestly. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)