Revision as of 04:30, 26 February 2009 editAzumanga1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers98,356 editsm →Question?← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:51, 26 February 2009 edit undoCarpathy2009 (talk | contribs)302 edits →Personal AttacksNext edit → | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
:I fundamentally reject your assessment that was a personal attack. Rather, your warning is a breach of ] and an indication of your continuing disruption. ] <small>(])</small> 23:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC) | :I fundamentally reject your assessment that was a personal attack. Rather, your warning is a breach of ] and an indication of your continuing disruption. ] <small>(])</small> 23:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Careful, Todd. He has God on his side. ;) ]] 23:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC) | ::Careful, Todd. He has God on his side. ;) ]] 23:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::There is no "admin-Wiki-guidelines warning" anywhere in your comment. Purely direct personal abuse. When I provided an explanatory reply (without responding to your abuse) you directed me to a page containing statements to "fuck off" by ]] and others. When I responded to that behaviour as that of "arseholes" unlike other Admins on that page who had the decency to block those who initiated the provocation, you later chose to issued a "Final Warning" to me for using those words. Double standards - and your comment above was clearly personal and abusive. --] (]) 06:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Nickcoop's edits == | == Nickcoop's edits == |
Revision as of 06:51, 26 February 2009
This is Toddst1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 2 days |
Re: Broader concerns about reversions
I labeled these four edits as Vandalism as ABC Family, WealthTV, and Fuse don't have broadcast affiliates and the user that made the edits is a sock puppet of Dingbat2007. See this discussion. Powergate92Talk 16:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- How do you know they're deliberate and how do you know they're incorrect? Toddst1 (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- See this discussion. Powergate92Talk 17:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
SummerPhD
This complaint didn't sound much like SummerPhD to me, so I looked a little bit. I'm sure that this is the sequence of edits referred to:
Based on This whois and this whois, it's apparent that it's the same editor, so all of this previous interaction applies.—Kww(talk) 16:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Having now seen a sock report and this info, I tend to agree. Without that info, I can only see what's presented at AIV. Will note summer's page. Toddst1 (talk) 16:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Heads up on a Block evasion
IP 24.187.112.15 has evaded your block. See this diff The similar part of the IP is the "24.187." Just FYI. Not sure if you can range block or not... ► RATEL ◄ 21:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Scriptural Reasoning
Dear Toddst1,
I noticed your recent posting on user Scripturalreasoning's user talk page, regarding Gordonofcartoon. I wonder if you might extend your admin interest to the article talk page which prompted the exchange between GoC and Scripturalreasoning. GoC became involved because user Scripturalreasoning posted a COI notice regarding the article Scriptural Reasoning. The talk page is verbose, I'm afraid. But a third opinion would be much appreciated. Many thanks Thelongview (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- TLDR Toddst1 (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed... Thelongview (talk) 19:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Block of User:92.10.187.232
Hi... It appears this anon user was actually undoing earlier vandalism. --Rrburke 15:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. I've unblocked. Toddst1 (talk) 15:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Personal Attacks
Regarding your comments on User talk:Scripturalreasoning: Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing.
Re "Exactly how loud can this WP:Duck quack? Toddst1 (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)"
--Scripturalreasoning (talk) 21:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- I fundamentally reject your assessment that this was a personal attack. Rather, your warning is a breach of Misplaced Pages guidelines and an indication of your continuing disruption. Toddst1 (talk) 23:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Careful, Todd. He has God on his side. ;) HalfShadow 23:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- There is no "admin-Wiki-guidelines warning" anywhere in your comment. Purely direct personal abuse. When I provided an explanatory reply (without responding to your abuse) you directed me to a page containing statements to "fuck off" by HalfShadow and others. When I responded to that behaviour as that of "arseholes" unlike other Admins on that page who had the decency to block those who initiated the provocation, you later chose to issued a "Final Warning" to me for using those words. Double standards - and your comment above was clearly personal and abusive. --Scripturalreasoning (talk) 06:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Nickcoop's edits
I hope that you have read through his edits. It started as large scale deletion. After an initial warning, he switched to cut and paste. First citing lack of references. Now it is simply cut and paste. Please read the content or forward it to a medicine administrator for review. He has been driving his agenda first by large scale deletion of the Mohs surgery article and basal cell cancer page since April 2008. It recurred again in Jan 09, and he has had several warnings concerning his edits of Mohs surgery, and basal cell cancer - basically driving his own agenda.--Northerncedar (talk) 00:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- If you truly feel there is disruption, take it to WP:ANI. It doesn't seem to be obvious vandalism, yet the edits might (or might not) be considered disruption. WP:AIV is for obvious vandalism. Toddst1 (talk) 00:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Canvassing
Canvasing? I am just frustrated to see continued "under the table" edits by someone to drive his own political agenda, and continued unsubstantiated edits that is repeated again, and again. I don't understand's wikipedia's methodology. I am not sure the process is working as intended?--Northerncedar (talk) 00:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Forum shopping is frowned upon. Please open a discussion on the talk page and if disruption is the consensus of the discussion, take to ANI. Toddst1 (talk) 00:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Karmaisking/Michael.suede
This guy goes beyond sock puppeteering. He's now engaged in deliberate disruption, creating socks as fast as they can be blocked. I'd appreciate it if you could help.JQ (talk) 00:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Template:Univision Texas
Well, KUVN-TV, KAKW-TV, KWEX-TV, and KXLN-TV have to be in boldface because they're owned-and-operated. Fran46 (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- An edit summary explaining that would have been helpful. Where in WP:MOS is that? I haven't come across it before. Toddst1 (talk) 00:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Question?
Can i ask you a question? Fran46 (talk) 16:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- uh.. sure. Toddst1 (talk) 00:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ignore him -- Fran46 is a suspected sockpuppet of Dingbat2007. -- azumanga (talk) 04:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Bob Marks
it would be highly appreciated if you would stop deleting the Bob Marks page. He is a meaningful, and highly eduacated teacher at West Genessee High School.24.58.32.129 (talk) 01:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)