Revision as of 01:07, 2 March 2009 editCrotchety Old Man (talk | contribs)3,365 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on The Silence of the Lambs (film). (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:48, 2 March 2009 edit undoNorthdevonian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,083 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
== March 2009 == | == March 2009 == | ||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:The Silence of the Lambs (film)|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 01:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:The Silence of the Lambs (film)|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 01:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Re:Abortion== | |||
I see you deleted all text and replaced it with "its murder". Good - Misplaced Pages is clearly an anti-life resource and we need to actively end this bias. --] (]) 21:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:48, 2 March 2009
Welcome
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
January 2009
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Killa Koz (talk) 01:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please refrain from making test edits in Misplaced Pages pages, such as those you made to List of best-selling video games, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 19:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Adventure films
I can't really source Spider-man 3 being noted as an adventure films. You can't toss in every genre for a film as well, you have to pick the one that best suits it. As a super hero film, Spider-man here suits best as an action film with it's comic book fights and secondary as either fantasy (the whole superhero costume deal) or sci-fi (with that Venom extra info about the moon and what not.). Compare it to the other films in the Category:2000s adventure films and you'll see the difference between these. Hope that helps! Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Film genres
Your recent edits to certain film article violate Misplaced Pages's policy on no original research. Your opinion on what genre they are or are not is irrelevant, and you need a source to back up your edits. Grsz 18:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Silence of the Lambs (film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tool2Die4 (talk) 20:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Jaws genre
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jaws (film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. The JPS 21:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Tom, we have a discussion going at the Jaws talk page. Please do not continue to edit Misplaced Pages without talking about this and giving your side of the argument. You have been warned about changing movie genres before, so try to talk it out this time. --PlasmaTwa2 22:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Tom, I really have to encourage you to discuss this on the talk page, otherwise your reverts could be interpreted as disruptive editing. The JPS 10:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Heat cast
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Heat (film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Srobak (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Tom your reversions continue despite multiple requests for you to move it to discussion on the talk page, or to address it here on your own talk page. By viewing the above discussions you appear to have a history of this type of behaviour, and do not appear interested in working to resolution in a coordinated manner. Based upon this - should further reversion or otherwise unfounded and destructive edits continue, I will move forward with pursuit of having your edit abilities blocked. Srobak (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Heat (1995 film), you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Your recent edit summary for an edit to this article is entirely inappropriate behaviour. Edit summaries are permanent. Do not attack editors again. (talk→ Bwilkins / BMW ←track) 22:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to The Dark Knight (film), you will be blocked from editing. --Cube lurker (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Recent edits (Feb. 10)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to The Dark Knight (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on The Silence of the Lambs (film). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
IMDb
I think you'll find that the internet movie database is not a reliable source as it is uses user-posted information. See ]. Only a very small amount of the info on it is regarded as reliable--Patton 18:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Civility
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on The Silence of the Lambs (film). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Ward3001 (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for repeated incivility, especially in edit summaries e.g. . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite 18:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
You need to calm down
Tom, you have recently started being extremely rude and somewhat disruptive on Misplaced Pages. You blanked the content from the Dark Knight movie page and have engaged in a revert war on the Silence of the Lambs page. In multiple cases you've insulted other editors in edit summaries.
Insulting other editors is a violation of Misplaced Pages's policies on civility in editing and not making personal attacks. You've done at least four serious attacks / insults in the last 24 hours, that I see. This has to stop.
It's not acceptable to keep behaving in this manner on Misplaced Pages. If you can control your language and continue to discuss disputes in a polite manner, you're welcome to keep editing here. If you cannot, and keep being abusive, that behavior is disruptive and corrosive to the project's community. That's not ok.
If you think you can control yourself and work with us rather than continuing to insult people, please keep editing when the short block above expires. If you don't think you can stay polite going forwards, please consider just walking away from Misplaced Pages on your own. If you keep abusing people, your account will be blocked for longer and longer, and if it keeps up too much longer you will be blocked. It's much better for you if you make up your own mind - either play by our rules and treat people here like adults, or leave of your own accord.
Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to the page Abortion has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -- Mentifisto 14:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Silence of the Lambs (film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 01:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Re:Abortion
I see you deleted all text and replaced it with "its murder". Good - Misplaced Pages is clearly an anti-life resource and we need to actively end this bias. --T.M.M. Dowd (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)