| Revision as of 10:14, 1 March 2009 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,631 editsm Signing comment by Knowledge Incarnate - "Roman Catholic"← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:06, 2 March 2009 edit undoHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits →Adminstrators noticeboard: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| == Roman Catholic == | == Roman Catholic == | ||
| I'm curious as to what part of the world you are from. In the United States it is perfectly normal to refer to someone in the Latin Rite as Roman Catholic. Why are you going so far out of your way to fuzz out this distinction on the ] article? Are you doing this on other articles? What exactly is your agenda here? There are 19,600,000 results of Google for Roman Catholic. I urge you to stop and consider that. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | I'm curious as to what part of the world you are from. In the United States it is perfectly normal to refer to someone in the Latin Rite as Roman Catholic. Why are you going so far out of your way to fuzz out this distinction on the ] article? Are you doing this on other articles? What exactly is your agenda here? There are 19,600,000 results of Google for Roman Catholic. I urge you to stop and consider that. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| == Adminstrators noticeboard == | |||
| Reluctantly, I have brought your conduct (specifically, the tagging of politically sensitive subjects with non-NPOV tags) up at ]. You can respond . I warned you about this behavior before, on December 27. ] (]) 22:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:06, 2 March 2009
The Simpsons Shorts
Please do not create pages for the Simpsons shorts. The only one with any notability is Good Night and it already has a page. The rest would fail WP:EPISODE and several pages for them have previously been deleted. If you want to create pages for them, please do so at the Simpsons Wiki where it would be a welcome addition. -- Scorpion 21:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- Why? The main shorts page isn't particularily long. The only reason each season of The Simpsons has its own page is because the master list would be huge if it included synopises, which is why it was split up. Three pages for a bunch of shorts (which aren't even their own season) isn't necessary. -- Scorpion 21:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
Your edits to abortion () were reverted because they were disruptive. Please make sure that all of your edits adhere to wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Using[REDACTED] as a soapbox is an abuse of wikipedia. If you have any questions about how[REDACTED] works, feel free to ask or research yourself by using the "Help" link. Thanks.-Andrew c 21:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Sunday infobox
I think this template is ill-advised, but I'm open to being convinced. Can you discuss, over on Template talk:infobox sunday?
Abortion
Please do not add the category "Murder" to the article on abortion. It is disruption of the article to prove a political point. Hipocrite (talk) 12:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
You've had your fun. It's time to stop now. Hipocrite (talk) 12:37, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
December 2008
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Homosexuality. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. EqualRights (talk) 14:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Using Misplaced Pages as a soapbox for personal opinions
Please stop using Misplaced Pages as a soapbox for voicing your personal opinions on subjects, as you did with the Timeline of LGBT history article. --Escape Orbit 23:31, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Roman Catholic
I'm curious as to what part of the world you are from. In the United States it is perfectly normal to refer to someone in the Latin Rite as Roman Catholic. Why are you going so far out of your way to fuzz out this distinction on the Alan Mullarkey article? Are you doing this on other articles? What exactly is your agenda here? There are 19,600,000 results of Google for Roman Catholic. I urge you to stop and consider that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowledge Incarnate (talk • contribs) 10:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Adminstrators noticeboard
Reluctantly, I have brought your conduct (specifically, the tagging of politically sensitive subjects with non-NPOV tags) up at WP:ANI. You can respond here. I warned you about this behavior before, on December 27. Hipocrite (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)