Revision as of 23:13, 8 March 2009 editOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →Bad faith: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:45, 8 March 2009 edit undoUnomi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,989 edits →Bad faithNext edit → | ||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
is inappropriate. First, you are assuming bad faith and making false accusations about two good faith editors. Second, there is no 3RR on the part of Keepcalm. Finally, the noticeboard is not even close to the place to resolving your issues. You need to step back, review Misplaced Pages policy, starting with ], before you embarrass yourself any further. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 23:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | is inappropriate. First, you are assuming bad faith and making false accusations about two good faith editors. Second, there is no 3RR on the part of Keepcalm. Finally, the noticeboard is not even close to the place to resolving your issues. You need to step back, review Misplaced Pages policy, starting with ], before you embarrass yourself any further. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 23:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
I think you have this the wrong way around, bad faith was assumed on his part when he started deleting my edits without explaining his reasoning. | |||
I clearly explained why I thought the edits were appropriate and he never responded, merely kept deleting and eventually seemed to enlist the help of Tom Harrison who also made unjustified deletions. | |||
] (]) 23:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Please, do not repeat yourself on my talk page. I watch your page, and I'll answer here, as it clearly states at the top of my user talk--don't waste my time. And you are bordering on a ] if you continue to accuse two editors of colluding. You have no proof of that, none whatsoever. Keepcalm has not even gotten close to 3RR. You are new around here, but you are getting really close to becoming problematic. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 23:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Cute. ] (]) 23:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
If you want to assist in resolving this issue you should direct your efforts at spelling out clearly and precisely what it is you take issue with. Baiting will not help you. ] (]) 23:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:45, 8 March 2009
3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aspartame controversy. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 21:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Bad faith
This complaint is inappropriate. First, you are assuming bad faith and making false accusations about two good faith editors. Second, there is no 3RR on the part of Keepcalm. Finally, the noticeboard is not even close to the place to resolving your issues. You need to step back, review Misplaced Pages policy, starting with WP:NPOV, before you embarrass yourself any further. OrangeMarlin 23:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I think you have this the wrong way around, bad faith was assumed on his part when he started deleting my edits without explaining his reasoning. I clearly explained why I thought the edits were appropriate and he never responded, merely kept deleting and eventually seemed to enlist the help of Tom Harrison who also made unjustified deletions. Unomi (talk) 23:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Please, do not repeat yourself on my talk page. I watch your page, and I'll answer here, as it clearly states at the top of my user talk--don't waste my time. And you are bordering on a personal attacks if you continue to accuse two editors of colluding. You have no proof of that, none whatsoever. Keepcalm has not even gotten close to 3RR. You are new around here, but you are getting really close to becoming problematic. OrangeMarlin 23:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Cute. Unomi (talk) 23:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to assist in resolving this issue you should direct your efforts at spelling out clearly and precisely what it is you take issue with. Baiting will not help you. Unomi (talk) 23:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)