| Revision as of 09:31, 14 March 2009 editPeterSymonds (talk | contribs)29,055 edits →The date is: {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}Please put your signature on additions to this page.: decline← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:54, 14 March 2009 edit undoHenrik (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,538 edits unblock offerNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=] is absolutely violating my rights on Misplaced Pages. Did I edit the article? No. I provided an opinion that is truthful on a talk page. THe blocking administrator had absolutely no right whatsoever to prevent me from expressing my opinion in a talk page. The blocking administrator blocked me of his own political opinion, as is obvious, otherwise you would have not called it non-worthy of discussion (Which it is). I will most certainly be contacting other administrators, as well as stewards, to discuss your extremely inappropriate behavior here. I have the support of trusted members of the Misplaced Pages community to contest this block (see: ] and ]). I am furious that I was blocked when I showed no disregard for any Misplaced Pages policy. I gave my complete, honest opinion of what should be added to a Misplaced Pages article, on the article's talk page (which is my right as a member of Misplaced Pages with a significant number of GFDL-compatible edits, and many votes for AfDs (as you can see in my voting record). I should receive punitive compensation against ] for the time I have spent not able to edit Misplaced Pages, and for the time spent writing this appeal. The defense rests.|decline=Your edits to the talk page violate ] and ]. Making wild conspiratorial accusations, and labeling living people using names like "domestic terrorist" without any cause or justification is clearly a violation of ]. Polite discussion is encouraged at talk pages, even on the issue of Obama's citizenship, but the sort of polemic you left at the Barak Obama is clearly disruptive. It does not appear you are interested in building consensus via evidence or anything else, but you merely want to demand that your version of The Truth be accepted regardless of what mainstream publications and neutral sources say on the matter.}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=] is absolutely violating my rights on Misplaced Pages. Did I edit the article? No. I provided an opinion that is truthful on a talk page. THe blocking administrator had absolutely no right whatsoever to prevent me from expressing my opinion in a talk page. The blocking administrator blocked me of his own political opinion, as is obvious, otherwise you would have not called it non-worthy of discussion (Which it is). I will most certainly be contacting other administrators, as well as stewards, to discuss your extremely inappropriate behavior here. I have the support of trusted members of the Misplaced Pages community to contest this block (see: ] and ]). I am furious that I was blocked when I showed no disregard for any Misplaced Pages policy. I gave my complete, honest opinion of what should be added to a Misplaced Pages article, on the article's talk page (which is my right as a member of Misplaced Pages with a significant number of GFDL-compatible edits, and many votes for AfDs (as you can see in my voting record). I should receive punitive compensation against ] for the time I have spent not able to edit Misplaced Pages, and for the time spent writing this appeal. The defense rests.|decline=Your edits to the talk page violate ] and ]. Making wild conspiratorial accusations, and labeling living people using names like "domestic terrorist" without any cause or justification is clearly a violation of ]. Polite discussion is encouraged at talk pages, even on the issue of Obama's citizenship, but the sort of polemic you left at the Barak Obama is clearly disruptive. It does not appear you are interested in building consensus via evidence or anything else, but you merely want to demand that your version of The Truth be accepted regardless of what mainstream publications and neutral sources say on the matter.}} | ||
| == Unblock offer == | |||
| The highly charged political articles of the day require a certain mindset and an ability to bring light rather than heat to the discussion. These articles require higher standards of editors, and administrators are tasked to enforce civility and decorum on the discussion as well as resolving problematic article edits. There is no right to free speech on wikipedia: If Misplaced Pages administration is not to your liking, you are free to copy all the contents and set up an alternative site - this is your one and only right guaranteed by free culture projects such as this. Despite that, I am, however, willing to unblock you, provided you give me your word to stay away from Barack Obama related topics for the original duration of your block and withdraw your accusations against Fut.Perf. above. <strong>]<small>•]</small></strong> 10:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:54, 14 March 2009
The date is: January 7, 2025
Please put your signature on additions to this page.
Axmann8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your edits were blatantly POV and tendentious. You were launching accusations around; that's not a discussion, that's soapboxing. As such, I'm declining this request, and urge you to be more neutral and wary when you edit controversial articles, after the block expires. Failure to do so will inevitably result in a longer block. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 09:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Please include a decline or accept reason.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Axmann8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wish to appeal this block directly to the arbitration committee. I have tried
other methods of contesting this block (see below), but I am still dissatisfied with
the administrator conduct in this case. I am requesting respectful administrator
assistance to help me file this request, as I am unable to start an arbitration
request on my own.
Also, per WP:FAITH, WP:IAR, and WP:BOLD.
Decline reason:
Requests where a user is appealing a block or a ban to the Arbitration Committee must be done via email, as the user in question naturally is in no position to engage the arbitration process. See Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee#Mailing_lists for more details on contacting the Committee. Daniel (talk) 08:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Note: I removed a large amount of unnecessary and nonsensical formatting from this request.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Axmann8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Fut.Perf. is absolutely violating my rights on Misplaced Pages. Did I edit the article? No. I provided an opinion that is truthful on a talk page. THe blocking administrator had absolutely no right whatsoever to prevent me from expressing my opinion in a talk page. The blocking administrator blocked me of his own political opinion, as is obvious, otherwise you would have not called it non-worthy of discussion (Which it is). I will most certainly be contacting other administrators, as well as stewards, to discuss your extremely inappropriate behavior here. I have the support of trusted members of the Misplaced Pages community to contest this block (see: User:Download and User:ChildofMidnight). I am furious that I was blocked when I showed no disregard for any Misplaced Pages policy. I gave my complete, honest opinion of what should be added to a Misplaced Pages article, on the article's talk page (which is my right as a member of Misplaced Pages with a significant number of GFDL-compatible edits, and many votes for AfDs (as you can see in my voting record). I should receive punitive compensation against Fut.Perf. for the time I have spent not able to edit Misplaced Pages, and for the time spent writing this appeal. The defense rests.
Decline reason:
Your edits to the talk page violate WP:BLP and WP:SOAPBOX. Making wild conspiratorial accusations, and labeling living people using names like "domestic terrorist" without any cause or justification is clearly a violation of WP:BLP. Polite discussion is encouraged at talk pages, even on the issue of Obama's citizenship, but the sort of polemic you left at the Barak Obama is clearly disruptive. It does not appear you are interested in building consensus via evidence or anything else, but you merely want to demand that your version of The Truth be accepted regardless of what mainstream publications and neutral sources say on the matter.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock offer
The highly charged political articles of the day require a certain mindset and an ability to bring light rather than heat to the discussion. These articles require higher standards of editors, and administrators are tasked to enforce civility and decorum on the discussion as well as resolving problematic article edits. There is no right to free speech on wikipedia: If Misplaced Pages administration is not to your liking, you are free to copy all the contents and set up an alternative site - this is your one and only right guaranteed by free culture projects such as this. Despite that, I am, however, willing to unblock you, provided you give me your word to stay away from Barack Obama related topics for the original duration of your block and withdraw your accusations against Fut.Perf. above. henrik•talk 10:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)