Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Just use '''gine''. It's succinct and has what the French call, 'a wow factor.' ] ] 14:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Just use '''gine''. It's succinct and has what the French call, 'a wow factor.' ] ] 14:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
:Hahaha. k. ]] 16:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
:Hahaha. k. ]] 16:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
== ] -> ] ==
In checking references, I discovered that Katarzyna Dolinska, is more correct than Katarzyna Dolińska. Can you please delete the locked redirect and move the unlocked article. <font color="DarkGray">...</font> ] <sup>]</sup> 19:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
:I think it's all done now. Moved over deleted redirects, restored to merge, changed all links and double-redirects. ]] 19:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Oh, the bitch is back Stone cold sober as a matter of fact I can bitch, I can bitch 'cause I'm better than you It's the way that I move The things that I do
Jenna I beleive the way it reads right now is totally appropriate. It is factual and is no different in my mind than the discussion on who bought the camp when, who inherited it when and who runs it now. These are all facts. Just like Michael died following the camps swim test. Additionally the case file with the Ontario Provincial Police is still open. They are now investigating whether there was any criminal negligence based upon testimony that came out in the Ministry of labors csse. Two people changed their stories. Assuming the OPP does not file criminal charges against the camp then the Regional Coroner may hold a Coroners Inquest.
Simply noting that the death occurred is not appropriate for the article. It's probably best to wait until the matter is settled. If fault is legally placed on the camp, then it would be appropriate to have the sourced information placed in the article. Until then, it needs to stay out. لennavecia15:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
You're aware that topic number 3 for today's WikiVoices recording is scheduled to be 'Expanding the role of female volunteers', proposed by Cary Bass? Recording is delayed by a few minutes; may we have liberty to discuss your declining to join us? Durova21:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Is this the "Skype chat" Synergy was talking about? He made no mention that it was any sort of formal discussion. Regardless, I had to go to work. Furthermore, that topic makes no sense to me. Misplaced Pages is mostly anonymous. A good number of "female contributors" have turned out to not actually be female. That isn't a problem for me, but it does lead one to wonder: what "role", exactly, is to be expanded? I don't see a difference between the female and male editors. I've never felt like I was somehow handicapped on this project because I've got a vag. Quite the opposite, actually. Expanding the role of female volunteers... really? لennavecia04:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
The actual point was to see if you were interested in joining the "chat" (And I did say that it was WikiVoices, and who was going to be there.). From there, we could have discussed the likelihood of you joining the recording. To my knowledge, you didn't say you were going to work. It was more like I'd rather watch grass grow, water boil, etc.Synergy11:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Don't forget "paint dry," and what I've actually been doing, which is "categorizing BLPs." It was all four of those things I listed. I just went back and checked the logs, because I don't recall you saying it was WikiVoices, but you did in the first line you pinged me, in which you stated you wanted me to join so you could argue with me. I suppose the mention of WV didn't stick with me because I'd never heard of it before. This was following you describing what I thought was just a regular chat as having gagging and flushing toilets, but before you noted that someone was "farting." I noted my reasons for expecting it to be boring, such as sole topics of discussion being photograph restoration and ANI, then you trolled for a bit. So that wrapped up at about 3pm my time. I then went to watch Dr. Phil while categorizing BLPs, then I got ready for work.
So, basically, Synergy is the worst possible candidate to invite anyone to anything. Obvious reasons aside, he pitched it in the most immature way possible, and didn't bother to emphasize what it was. Having never heard of this program before, I find it unlikely many would have taken the toilet humor as an introduction to anything intended to be serious. Moreover, had I been presented an invitation worth accepting, upon learning the topic, I most likely would have still declined for reasons noted above.
And last, but surely not least: Chip, are you sure? I'll have to check on that... checking... Okay, so "vag" has way more definitions, but the lead one is bad times for me to use. For "vaj", about 1/4 as many definitions, but a simple abbreviation. I think, however, I'll stick with "vag" because using a j makes no sense, and it's Urban Dictionary I'm using to determine all this, which is about as reliable as Misplaced Pages, amirite? ;) And, to be real, I don't normally use it. Only in places where people tend to frown on swearing. :D لennavecia12:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, I did in fact mention to Durova that I'm the last person who should be asking you (based on the "trolling" you note; just childish jokes and what not on irc, never really serious but also note that was a joke on Julian and not you), but only you, given our history of sarcasm ;). I figured if you were really interested you would have gone to the project page. No worries though. Synergy12:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Would have gone to the project page if I'd realized it was a project. Maybe link it next time you mention it to someone. That's what SoxBot and YamaBot are for. لennavecia13:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Doh! I keep forgetting they're in there. I'm more used to seeing unilinky (a different link bot). Synergy13:25, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
I've been on a few episodes of it when it was Not The Misplaced Pages Weekly, and I provided web hosting for the MP3 versions and RSS / iTunes feed. It can be interesting or boring depending on whether you're into the topic they're discussing. Usually they're doing it in a time slot that isn't convenient to me, like when I'm still at work. *Dan T.* (talk) 13:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
No worries. We're hidden on an obscure corner of the project nobody ever notices: a box right by the Signpost and Misplaced Pages Weekly at the Community Portal. Only been there a year. How was the paint; is it dry yet? ;) Durova14:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
...per our discussion. Note, your TPWs are more than welcome to add articles to the list, and/or spread the word. ++Lar: t/c03:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
test
–Juliancolton | has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
In checking references, I discovered that Katarzyna Dolinska, is more correct than Katarzyna Dolińska. Can you please delete the locked redirect and move the unlocked article. ... MistyWillows19:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)_Katarzyna_Dolinska">
_Katarzyna_Dolinska">
I think it's all done now. Moved over deleted redirects, restored to merge, changed all links and double-redirects. لennavecia19:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=small}
