Revision as of 21:35, 9 April 2009 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: Nick Adenhart: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:34, 9 April 2009 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: Nick Adenhart: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
Re : I removed the links per the ]. I believe that most of the material covered in the links is already covered in the article. You are welcome to add any missing material from the article using those two articles as sources. -- ] (]) 21:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | Re : I removed the links per the ]. I believe that most of the material covered in the links is already covered in the article. You are welcome to add any missing material from the article using those two articles as sources. -- ] (]) 21:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Re : Yes, I read the articles, twice actually. -- ] (]) 23:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:34, 9 April 2009
Welcome!
|
Jerold Hoffberger
I have repaired the changes you have made to the references sections of this article once again. Please read Misplaced Pages:Layout and Misplaced Pages:Citing sources before you attempt to rearrange the sections at the end of any other articles. Thank you. Rklear (talk) 01:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Philadelphia Phillies
Then provide references for that particular fact. In addition, being repetitive doesn't help us at all; the words burgundy and maroon can be acceptable substitutes for the word "crimson," so there's no real problem. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 15:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
re:Ted Uhlaender
You are welcome. Not let's see if it will inspire his daughter Katie to win gold in women's skeleton at the FIBT World Championships 2009 in Lake Placid, New York this weekend. Chris (talk) 03:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Tom Renney
No worries at all! And thanks very much, I appreciate it. The article really was in terrible condition eh? One of many for sure. Hopefully we'll see each other working on some other articles. Cheers. Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 01:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
NYT citations
Hi The Ink Daddy!
The "?ref=obituaries" suffix to links in NY Times URLs is appended to the main article URL when a reader clicks through a link from the obituaries page of the Times (analogously to the way "?hpw" or other suffixes may be added when a user clicks though the main page). Since those circumstances are not the case when following a link from Misplaced Pages, it is not best practices to include them in references.
Regards, Bongomatic 18:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Nick Adenhart
Re your message: I removed the links per the external link guidelines. I believe that most of the material covered in the links is already covered in the article. You are welcome to add any missing material from the article using those two articles as sources. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Re your message: Yes, I read the articles, twice actually. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)