| Revision as of 01:39, 15 November 2005 editReyk (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,854 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:46, 15 November 2005 edit undoAntaeus Feldspar (talk | contribs)17,763 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| **'''Please note:''' I wish you hadn't just moved the page like . If anything you have only made it more confusing for admins to settles this afd. -- ] ] 01:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | **'''Please note:''' I wish you hadn't just moved the page like . If anything you have only made it more confusing for admins to settles this afd. -- ] ] 01:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ***Comment. Sorry, I was being ]. I have indeed moved the article to ], and ask that an admin will kindly delete the redirect ], as redirects from article space to userspace are improper. I'm sorry that the AFD template on the article consequently no longer links to this discussion. OTOH, the discussion has become kinda moot, why not just close it? Just my opinion. ] 01:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | ***Comment. Sorry, I was being ]. I have indeed moved the article to ], and ask that an admin will kindly delete the redirect ], as redirects from article space to userspace are improper. I'm sorry that the AFD template on the article consequently no longer links to this discussion. OTOH, the discussion has become kinda moot, why not just close it? Just my opinion. ] 01:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ****The AfD template now works once again, since I've moved the article back from userspace. Userfication is ''one possible option'' open to us for resolving inappropriate material put into the article namespace. It is not an end run where you can just say "oh, maybe I shouldn't have done that but now that I have it's moot so don't worry your pretty little head over it." -- ] 01:46, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Userify''' if possible otherwise '''Delete'''. I found it funny but utterly pointless. --] 01:21, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | *'''Userify''' if possible otherwise '''Delete'''. I found it funny but utterly pointless. --] 01:21, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Don't Delete'''The legend of the Swiss Knight is not fiction(though embellished for drama) and should have a place here, as it hails some of the older myths present. If indeed wikipedia is a centre of knowledge then it would do well to host such a genre of thought that AshJW has put forth. {{unsigned|M1thrand1r|20:24, 14 November 2005}} ''This is {{user|M1thrand1r}}'s only edit.'' | *'''Don't Delete'''The legend of the Swiss Knight is not fiction(though embellished for drama) and should have a place here, as it hails some of the older myths present. If indeed wikipedia is a centre of knowledge then it would do well to host such a genre of thought that AshJW has put forth. {{unsigned|M1thrand1r|20:24, 14 November 2005}} ''This is {{user|M1thrand1r}}'s only edit.'' | ||
Revision as of 01:46, 15 November 2005
The Swiss Knight
Vanity page, utter nonsense, no real claim to notability, elaborate hoax, extensive joke, pick your favorite reason. -- malo (talk) 00:43, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Not funny. Ashibaka (tock) 00:46, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, this isn't the place for creating random fiction. - Bobet 00:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Don't Delete it should be known that all of the events written of did actually happen, with a couple minor adjustments to make them more spectacular. Gentlemen, if you kill this article, 1000 more shall spring up in its place, I beg of you to save the Knight and the justice he stands for.AshJW 00:58, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Don't Delete For saving the long hard work and dedication that went into this very true, and very interesting page.Opals25 20:04, 14 November 2005 (UTC) User's only edits are this AFD nom and user page.
- Delete. If not any of the above, certainly an extremely elaborate inside joke. --howcheng 01:10, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Don't Delete This article deserves to be here, not only as an entertaining read but as a lesson to all those who behold this story. It is indeed true, for I have paid witness to its events, and therefore there is no reason for this to be deleted unless you aspire to be a menace to all those who could benefit from this masterful article. What harm has this done to you, I ask? Silver Mobius 01:15, 15 November 2005 (UTC) Silver Mobius (talk · contribs) has two edits, both to this AfD.
- Whoa. Don't delete, userfy. Obviously inappropriate in the article namespace, but have you no humanity? Frutti di Mare 01:19, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Please note: I wish you hadn't just moved the page like that. If anything you have only made it more confusing for admins to settles this afd. -- malo (talk) 01:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Sorry, I was being bold. I have indeed moved the article to User:AshJW/The Swiss Knight, and ask that an admin will kindly delete the redirect The Swiss Knight, as redirects from article space to userspace are improper. I'm sorry that the AFD template on the article consequently no longer links to this discussion. OTOH, the discussion has become kinda moot, why not just close it? Just my opinion. Frutti di Mare 01:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- The AfD template now works once again, since I've moved the article back from userspace. Userfication is one possible option open to us for resolving inappropriate material put into the article namespace. It is not an end run where you can just say "oh, maybe I shouldn't have done that but now that I have it's moot so don't worry your pretty little head over it." -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:46, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Sorry, I was being bold. I have indeed moved the article to User:AshJW/The Swiss Knight, and ask that an admin will kindly delete the redirect The Swiss Knight, as redirects from article space to userspace are improper. I'm sorry that the AFD template on the article consequently no longer links to this discussion. OTOH, the discussion has become kinda moot, why not just close it? Just my opinion. Frutti di Mare 01:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Please note: I wish you hadn't just moved the page like that. If anything you have only made it more confusing for admins to settles this afd. -- malo (talk) 01:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Userify if possible otherwise Delete. I found it funny but utterly pointless. --W.marsh 01:21, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Don't DeleteThe legend of the Swiss Knight is not fiction(though embellished for drama) and should have a place here, as it hails some of the older myths present. If indeed wikipedia is a centre of knowledge then it would do well to host such a genre of thought that AshJW has put forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M1thrand1r (talk • contribs) 20:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC) This is M1thrand1r (talk · contribs)'s only edit.
- Delete as not-notable fiction. Put this on a blog, guys, not on Misplaced Pages. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Not encyclopedic. Reyk 01:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC)