Revision as of 01:47, 14 April 2009 editWadewitz (talk | contribs)50,892 edits →200px|The Misplaced Pages Signpost|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009: response to Ed17← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:48, 14 April 2009 edit undoWadewitz (talk | contribs)50,892 edits →Street newspaper: my pleasureNext edit → | ||
Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
Thank you very much for your thorough copyedit. I'm sorry if I threw you off or got in your way by making a couple edits while you were copyediting; I don't think we were editing at cross purposes or anything, but I might have accidentally given you that impression. Anyway, thanks again for all your help, <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 01:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | Thank you very much for your thorough copyedit. I'm sorry if I threw you off or got in your way by making a couple edits while you were copyediting; I don't think we were editing at cross purposes or anything, but I might have accidentally given you that impression. Anyway, thanks again for all your help, <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 01:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
:No edit conflicts on this side. It was my pleasure to copy edit the article. What a wonderful contribution! This is the type of article that I think should go on the main page ''immediately'' after promotion. :) ] (]) 01:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:48, 14 April 2009
I like to keep conversational threads together, so I will respond to your comment here. |
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 · 39 · 40 |
FACs needing feedback view • edit | |
---|---|
2007 Greensburg tornado | Review it now |
Belvidere Apollo Theatre collapse | Review it now |
Dean and Knapp
While you have Dean and Knapp, does it have any discussion of Ero e Leandro (a.k.a. Qual ti reveggio)? I'd love to get that article up to GA (or at least a firm B), but it doesn't seem to have a lot of sources. If Dean and Knapp have decent material on it, I might be able to improve it. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 17:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
United States Academic Decathlon
So, I wanted to take you up on your offer to go through line-by-line through United States Academic Decathlon. If you could do that, it would be much appreciated. It doesn't have to be urgent; if you could do it whenever you think you have enough free time, that would be great. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 14:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Done and I've left a note at your userpage. Awadewit (talk) 05:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK idea
Hi, A! Would you peek in at this discussion? Getting MRG's new article submitted to DYK, so that it's running simultaneously with the Dispatch, could result in double coverage of the Plagiarism issues. Since you've become a regular there, I'm wondering if you can be helpful in getting it through DYK (or encouraging it to run when the Dispatch launches, which should be early on the 13th, but one never knows)? I'm also guessing that you're still interested in putting out blurbs about the Dispatch at DYK, FAC, etc. once it moves to an "official" Signpost page? Signpost publication can be somewhat irregular; I just wait for the temp page to go live (when Ragesoss moves it). Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- And, I should add what a fine piece of this work this Dispatch is ! Congratulations!! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Responded and thanks! Awadewit (talk) 00:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, A; that was a very nice touch ! Now, we batten down the hatches and hope for a good reception :) Great work, and a fun collaboration (I wish all Dispatches could be so interesting). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
GA review
Thank you for your review at Talk:Harvard Girl/GA1. I have left some comments and responses there; I will continue to update the review page as I go. Best, rʨanaɢ /contribs 00:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Correct name of English version of Norwegian article
Hi, I wonder if you could help me out, I am about to start translating an article about Oslo and the article is about the differences between the eastern part (working class, lower living standards etc) and the western part of the city.
In Norwegian it is Østkant og vestkant i Oslo which directly would be "Eastside and Westside in Oslo". But when I checked with a dictionary it seems that "Eastend and Westend in Oslo" also would be possible. What do you think? Are there other options that may be better? Best regards, Ulflarsen (talk) 16:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I think "Eastside and westside of Oslo". "Eastside and westside" are used generally to mean the east and west sections of a city, so I would go with your first translation. Awadewit (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Jane Austen
I am responding to your comment about Bride and Prejudice on the Jane Austen page. I see that my contribution has been swiftly deleted, which absolutely amazes me. Frankly, Bride and Prejudice merits a mention on the main page because of its unique quality of demonstrating world wide (intercontinental) interest in Jane, which is different than Amy Heckerling's Clueless, which interpreted Jane in a modern way. I was quite careful to introduce this smidgen of information on the main Jane Austen page and thought about it carefully.
I also left a message about the A&E Pride and Prejudice adaptation. Strictly speaking, it was broadcast before Ang Lee's Sense and Sensibility hit the theatres and should at least be mentioned on the main page as having ushered in a series of television adaptations that continue to this day.Vsanborn (talk) 21:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Stamata Revithi
You can add the article to feminism's portal! Cheers!--Yannismarou (talk) 22:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Dictionary of Literary Biography
On April 12, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dictionary of Literary Biography, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 15:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Great, now create a page for their Twentieth Century Literary Criticism. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Dinosaur
Hi Awadewit,
The image in question was taken in the United States. I have read the freedom of panorama guidelines you mentioned, and am now under the impression that the image constitutes a derivative work, something of which I had not been aware at the time of initial upload. Would the appropriate course of action be to reduce the size of the image or to remove it from Misplaced Pages?
Neelix (talk) 23:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
PS - Out of curiosity, what is the significance of your username?
- Yes, you have created a derivative work. You could try to get permission from the original copyright holder and have them send it to OTRS (see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission and Misplaced Pages:Example requests for permission). Otherwise, it will have to be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 00:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Awadewit,
- The Walt Disney Company is probably the original copyright holder, and I have no idea what channels would be appropriate to go through. Perhaps it would be best to simply have it deleted.
- Happy editing,
Misplaced Pages Signpost: 13 April 2009
- License update: Licensing vote begins
- News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
- Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 15:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
DANFS
Thought on the plagiarism dispatch: what is that trying to say to the many DANFS-copied ship articles? —Ed 17 00:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Could you show me how this is being done? Then I will give you my thoughts. Awadewit (talk) 01:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Street newspaper
Thank you very much for your thorough copyedit. I'm sorry if I threw you off or got in your way by making a couple edits while you were copyediting; I don't think we were editing at cross purposes or anything, but I might have accidentally given you that impression. Anyway, thanks again for all your help, rʨanaɢ /contribs 01:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- No edit conflicts on this side. It was my pleasure to copy edit the article. What a wonderful contribution! This is the type of article that I think should go on the main page immediately after promotion. :) Awadewit (talk) 01:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)