| Revision as of 00:05, 16 November 2005 editDominic (talk | contribs)Administrators29,558 edits 3RR← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:35, 16 November 2005 edit undoQuestor2 (talk | contribs)12 edits →Questor2Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. ]·] 00:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. ]·] 00:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == Questor2 == | |||
| I will move the picture to the bottom, next to the other picture, and place a warning at the top of the article tomorrow evening. I would do it now, but I appear now to have been blocked by a zealot. | |||
| Actually, I should properly have said "iconoclast". | |||
Revision as of 00:35, 16 November 2005
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you.--Doc 23:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Perhaps you can try to insert the following text:
A European Depiction of Muhammad
But putting the image in-line will not work. And do NOT revert again. Regards.Voice of All 23:58, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Questor, Muslims believe that pictures of Muhammad are forbidden. Sure, that doesn't apply to Misplaced Pages -- we should try to tell the truth fearlessly -- but in this case, the picture is not historically important, nor is it a photo. It conveys no information whatsoever and it seems to me that the only reason to add it IS to offend Muslims.
A similar problem in the Bahai article was handled somewhat differently. Actual photos of Baha'ullah do exist, but Bahai do not want to see them, lest this be taken as idol-worship. Hence the photos (which ARE information, and of interest to non-Bahai) are at the end of the article, I believe, so that Bahai can read the warning and stop scrolling. Zora 23:59, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, how about pasting this near the end of the article:
- {{linkimage|Mohammed_picture.JPG|A European Depiction of Muhammad}}Voice of All 00:02, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
3RR
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. Dmcdevit·t 00:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Questor2
I will move the picture to the bottom, next to the other picture, and place a warning at the top of the article tomorrow evening. I would do it now, but I appear now to have been blocked by a zealot.
Actually, I should properly have said "iconoclast".