| Revision as of 20:29, 24 April 2009 editDahn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers147,944 edits →Belarus–South Africa relations: d← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:46, 24 April 2009 edit undoTimmeh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,169 edits →Belarus–South Africa relations: deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| *'''Delete''' - utterly random, inane pairing totally devoid of notability. - ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 20:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - utterly random, inane pairing totally devoid of notability. - ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 20:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Inane indeed. ] (]) 20:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Inane indeed. ] (]) 20:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' and put any relevant information (there seems to be some) into each country's article. The relations themselves are not notable enough for their own article. ]]] 21:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:46, 24 April 2009
Belarus–South Africa relations
- Belarus–South Africa relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced stub about a bilateral relationship of no notability establishable by me. Bali ultimate (talk) 18:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - utterly random, inane pairing totally devoid of notability. - Biruitorul 20:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Inane indeed. Dahn (talk) 20:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete and put any relevant information (there seems to be some) into each country's article. The relations themselves are not notable enough for their own article. Timmeh! 21:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC)