Revision as of 10:38, 26 April 2009 editTonywalton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,910 edits +ani notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:37, 26 April 2009 edit undoIkip (talk | contribs)59,234 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:I give both you and Brendan19 permission to edit my section. Ikip. 14:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | :I give both you and Brendan19 permission to edit my section. Ikip. 14:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
<!-- | |||
== Canvassing == | |||
{{Unblock| | |||
# '''Reason for block''' This block is about this message on ]: | |||
:# ''Note: This debate has been included at ], ], ] Ikip (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)'' | |||
:# Below this message ], a deletionist, posted two notices there was no warning to her that she was to be blocked. | |||
Regarding the above: | |||
# '''Justification for posting''' there is absolutly no rule against posting to article talk pages, a neutral message. I posted three messages, with the note "FYI", I then notified the AfD about this notfication. A man in black's block is unjustified. As per admin ], ], ], ] at ] there is no bases for this block. | |||
# A Man in Black states that I have been warned before. Partisan edit warriors, such as a Man in Black, have attempted to block me before for alleged canvassing, and the community has always overwhelmingly rebuked these baseless requests, because they have no merit. | |||
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is ]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic ].}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] <sup>]</sup> 10:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
# '''Procedural problems''' I recieved no message that I was blocked. | |||
# '''History of A man in Black''' A man in black is an incredibly disruptive editor who has been blocked more than any other administrator. | |||
# A man in black is not a uninvolved editor, he is a partisan edit warrior who supports most deletions who I have actively opposed many of his disruptive activities. | |||
# | |||
--> |
Revision as of 13:37, 26 April 2009
Click here to leave me a messageAwards and articles I created. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard/RfA_Report
Best welcome template: User:AxG/WikiWelcome1 wikipediareview: History of wikipedia |
more for the list
RE: Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Collect
. you could use this as an example of not getting along well w/ others, strawman arguments, general rudeness ("I have now editted well over 250 pages -- and I think you have not. Thabnks! And please feel free not to reply. Collect (talk) 11:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)") or a new section composed of his false accusations w/out apology or acknowledgment. or you dont have to use this at all. i just thought it was a good example of poor behavior on his part. Brendan19 (talk) 07:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- It would be much more convincing if you created your own section, or added this to your section. I am going over 5,000 edits, so it is hard to add everything, even with the magic of collapsible sections. Ikip (talk) 13:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ikip. Here are a series of deletions on Joe the Plumber that you were also involved with. This would fall under the section of deleting well sourced content:
I'm personally fine adding these to my section, but yours is very well structured and helpful so I'll follow your recommendation. Also this cite (already in the list above) shows Collect reintroducing OR, where he brings in legal research and applies to Joe.Mattnad (talk) 14:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- I give both you and Brendan19 permission to edit my section. Ikip. 14:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)