Revision as of 02:13, 5 May 2009 editSPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs)30,768 edits BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified)(Notice, missing codeletters)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:15, 5 May 2009 edit undoSynergy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,794 edits →Report date May 5 2009, 02:12 (UTC): archiveNext edit → | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments | ;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments | ||
<!-- TEMPLATE:User:SPCUClerkbot/moreinfo-RFCU Do not remove this comment! -->] '''Additional information needed''': Please provide a ]. ] (]) 02:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | <!-- TEMPLATE:User:SPCUClerkbot/moreinfo-RFCU Do not remove this comment! -->] '''Additional information needed''': Please provide a ]. ] (]) 02:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{clerk-note}} Blocked. ''']'''] 02:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
;Conclusions | ;Conclusions | ||
{{SPIclose|archive}} | |||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 02:15, 5 May 2009
DougsTech
DougsTech (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DougsTech/Archive.
Report date May 5 2009, 02:12 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Myownusername (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Evidence submitted by Mythdon
- DougsTech opposes users with "too many administrators currently" (examples: )
- The suspected sockpuppet (Myownusername) recently participated in an RfA using similar phrasing ("Much too many admins lately"). Here's the diff.
- It is noted that there was a proposal of a topic ban on DougsTech from participating in RfA's which reached no consensus. Despite not reaching consensus, DougsTech has not participated in an RfA since the discussion closure. A look through the contributions of DougsTech will answer this.
- The timing of of which Myownusername commented in the RfA is only about three days long after the account was created (May 2, 2009).
—Mythdon t/c 02:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
- CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
- Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by —Mythdon t/c 02:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 02:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Clerk note: Blocked. Synergy 02:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It will shortly be archived automatically. |
{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.
Categories: