Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/DougsTech: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:13, 5 May 2009 editSPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs)30,768 edits BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified)(Notice, missing codeletters)← Previous edit Revision as of 02:15, 5 May 2009 edit undoSynergy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,794 edits Report date May 5 2009, 02:12 (UTC): archiveNext edit →
Line 42: Line 42:
;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments ;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
<!-- TEMPLATE:User:SPCUClerkbot/moreinfo-RFCU Do not remove this comment! -->] '''Additional information needed''': Please provide a ]. ] (]) 02:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC) <!-- TEMPLATE:User:SPCUClerkbot/moreinfo-RFCU Do not remove this comment! -->] '''Additional information needed''': Please provide a ]. ] (]) 02:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
{{clerk-note}} Blocked. ''']'''] 02:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)



;Conclusions ;Conclusions
{{SPIclose|archive}}



---- ----

Revision as of 02:15, 5 May 2009

DougsTech

DougsTech (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DougsTech/Archive.


Report date May 5 2009, 02:12 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Mythdon
  • DougsTech opposes users with "too many administrators currently" (examples: )
  • The suspected sockpuppet (Myownusername) recently participated in an RfA using similar phrasing ("Much too many admins lately"). Here's the diff.
  • It is noted that there was a proposal of a topic ban on DougsTech from participating in RfA's which reached no consensus. Despite not reaching consensus, DougsTech has not participated in an RfA since the discussion closure. A look through the contributions of DougsTech will answer this.
  • The timing of of which Myownusername commented in the RfA is only about three days long after the account was created (May 2, 2009).

Mythdon t/c 02:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by —Mythdon t/c 02:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 02:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)  Clerk note: Blocked. Synergy 02:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It will shortly be archived automatically.

{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.


Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DougsTech: Difference between revisions Add topic