| Revision as of 04:00, 5 May 2009 view sourceCowboySpartan (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,293 edits →Card Sharks← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:04, 5 May 2009 view source ChrisP2K5 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,361 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :::With all due respect, Sottolacqua is a troll. And quite frankly, so are you. I will kindly ask you to refrain from posting a reply. --] (]) 21:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC) | :::With all due respect, Sottolacqua is a troll. And quite frankly, so are you. I will kindly ask you to refrain from posting a reply. --] (]) 21:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::::You should familiarize yourself with ] ] (]) 04:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | ::::You should familiarize yourself with ] ] (]) 04:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::::You need to grasp the concept of "disruptive edits." Your constant nitpicking of my edits- most of which DO NOT CAUSE ANY PROBLEM- come very close to stalking and it's very grating. I'm giving you one warning and no more- either leave me alone and let me edit, or I go to ANI. --] (]) 04:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:04, 5 May 2009
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4
Card Sharks
Please don't re-create the article on the 2001 revival. Revivals don't get their own articles in most cases, and precedent in the article has been that the 2001 revival should stay in the main article. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 17:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Please don't tell me what to do. The fact remains that the revival is so dissimilar to the other two versions that NOT including a separate page for it is wrong. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 20:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- According to whom? There's no consensus whatsoever for it to be its own article. If other editors such as Sottolacqua are protesting the split, then clearly it's not meant to be split. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 21:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- With all due respect, Sottolacqua is a troll. And quite frankly, so are you. I will kindly ask you to refrain from posting a reply. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 21:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- You should familiarize yourself with this article. Sottolacqua (talk) 04:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- You need to grasp the concept of "disruptive edits." Your constant nitpicking of my edits- most of which DO NOT CAUSE ANY PROBLEM- come very close to stalking and it's very grating. I'm giving you one warning and no more- either leave me alone and let me edit, or I go to ANI. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 04:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- You should familiarize yourself with this article. Sottolacqua (talk) 04:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- With all due respect, Sottolacqua is a troll. And quite frankly, so are you. I will kindly ask you to refrain from posting a reply. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 21:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- According to whom? There's no consensus whatsoever for it to be its own article. If other editors such as Sottolacqua are protesting the split, then clearly it's not meant to be split. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 21:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)