Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 05:51, 22 May 2009

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng

Goldra and Silvra

Look, the fact is the two Riders are tied to the Decade series storyline as Cho Den-O is a direct part of the Decade continity and the two were explained to be the reason why Den-O's world is in chaos as Kotaro and Ryotaro explained. Fractyl (talk) 03:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Unless you've seen the movie, this does not have any relevance. Goldra and Silvra are Cho Den-O characters, and the only connection to Decade is that he is in the movie and it was tied in with the Den-O World arc. Your edits to Template:Kamen Rider Decade have been making the formatting of the template poor. There does not need to be a separate line for films for Decade, yet. It fits in with just the Media set.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Actally, I'm waiting to see the movie. Also you forget, Silvra appeared in Decade, the first scene likely to be part of the movie (where NEW Den-O appears to fight the Gelnewts) and the second when Kotaro explains the Oni Tribe are the ones causing the time distortion. So while the two are Cho Den-O characters, they are also part of Decade's continity in spite of their cameos.Fractyl (talk) 13:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

--

What do you mean Goldra and Silvra doesn't start with Kamen Rider of course they start with Kamen Rider or they would be plain Oni's. AlienX2009 (talk) 17:52, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

From all that is known, they are just "Goldra" and "Silvra" and not "Kamen Rider Goldra" and "Kamen Rider Silvra".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

The fact is the two are labeled as Oni, not like "Kamen Rider Hibiki" Oni, but Oni in the sense of "Momotaro" Oni. Besides, Shadowmoon's considered a Kamen Rider yet he doesn't need it. Fractyl (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Shadowmoon isn't a Kamen Rider. The Showa Kamen Riders are limited to 1, 2, V3, Riderman, X, Amazon, Stronger, Skyrider, Super-1, ZX, and BLACK (RX). Shin, ZO, and J are separate from the Heisei Riders. The only one in this list that does not have "Kamen Rider" in the name is Riderman.

But I digress, Goldra and Silvra do not have "Kamen Rider" in their names. They are just "Goldra" and "Silvra".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Like I said, he's considered a Rider but not offically one. Fractyl (talk) 11:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Alright, fine but why can't we just keep it as "Kamen Rider Silvra" and "Kamen Rider Goldra" there's nothing wrong with that. AlienX2009 (talk) 03:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Not the right names.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Why can't we put the forms of the ridrs such as BLACK RX or Kuuga. AlienX2009 (talk) 04:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

They're identical to the motif of the original Rider. There's no difference between RX, Kuuga, and Agito and their forms. Kiva's forms are also kinda the same with that.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

How about Final Forms. AlienX2009 (talk) 05:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

No.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Are you sure Kuuga's new form is called Rising Ultimate Form (ライジングアルティメットフォーム, Raijingu Arutimetto Foumu)? AlienX2009 (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I saw it myself. I'm the one (well, one of the two) who found the pictures of it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Okay, okay. I just thought that Diend summoned Kamen Rider Den-O and Agito. AlienX2009 (talk) 05:22, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Kamen Rider Decade

Just so you know, I have changed the block threat made in the Kamen Rider Decade article to a warning that such changes would be reverted and the user warned. What do you think? Did I make the right decision for the right reason? —Mythdon t/c 05:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Mythdon, are you aware that there are 6,936,592 articles in this project?  Frank  |  talk  22:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I am aware that there are a lot of pages in this project. Why did you show up anyway? If I wanted a response from anyone, it would be Ryulong. That's why the post is here, not on the talk page of anyone else. —Mythdon t/c 23:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages is a community. I "showed up" because I'm a member of that community, just as you are, and just as Ryūlóng is. I think (and this is just my opinion) that if you want to know what Ryūlóng thought of your edit, you can see for yourself.  Frank  |  talk  00:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I saw that diff just after replying to you. And yes, I do know that Misplaced Pages is a community. It's just that my initial posting in this section was directed towards Ryulong. —Mythdon t/c 00:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it seems many of your edits are directed at Ryūlóng, which was why I pointed out the number of pages in the project in the first place.  Frank  |  talk  15:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Do you still remember when you declinded my request for rollback, but three days later requested it again and got it? Do you feel like checking my contributions and seeing if I have used the tool properly? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 19:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Not the point.  Frank  |  talk  00:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Stay Strong!

Have you thought about resigning from your admin position and standing for another RFA before the Arbcom makes its final decision? I have read all the history of the "dispute" and I know I will support you if you ran for Admin right now. Gerhardt Lammers (talk) 02:59, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

*cough* Gerhardt Lammers (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic period. *cough* JPG-GR (talk) 03:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I think the editor is a sockpuppet of Yardleyman. I am filing a checkuser request, and will notify you and Ryulong once I do so. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

My suspicions are the same.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I have just filed a checkuser request regarding the user at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Yardleyman. I'm not sure if that would be the right name, but still, it is needed. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

If you can perhaps collect a bunch of other account names, that might be helpful.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Do you think the name of the case is right? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

That's unimportant.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Okay. Checkuser date confrims that the two users are on the same IP address. What do you think? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 04:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I made that request to Versageek to check.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Good. Well now another sockpuppet is down. Hopefully this is the end of the disruption of the case. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 04:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Samantha Orobator AfD

Hello, would you please follow consensus and merge information from the article into the Human Rights in Laos article? There were multiple calls for this information to be preserved if the article ended up being deleted. thanks! riffic (talk) 23:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

If you tell me what information you want specifically, I can provide it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Yellow Ranger

Could you please tell me how this is suitable lead content? It was a removal of unsourced content and was also a removal of an unworthy mention which I don't feel had any business in the article. The information required a reliable source, and can't be on the page until there is one cited. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 01:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Sourced to the source material and that particular episode of a third party program.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

How is that going to cut it? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 02:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Because the source material is as official as it gets, as does the broadcast of an entirely different television program.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Aren't those primary sources? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 02:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

They're suitable sources and you aren't the one to decide whether they can or cannot be used.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I am not the one who is deciding. I'm just going by what is decided in WP:RS. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Your interpretations of Misplaced Pages policy have always been in question.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Why should it be questioned? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Ask the arbitration committee. I'm done with this conversation.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I assume that you are aware of WP:3RR as you are an admin...so I won't leave a templated warning about that. If it was simply a list of characters, primary sources would be fine. Once you start adding OR and info cited to reality gossip shows, you're going to need some better sourcing. --Onorem♠Dil 03:08, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I've removed that content at this point. I realized it wasn't really necessary, and I doubted that I was going to find some sort of summary of that particular episode of the TV show (which you've really miscategorized there).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:11, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I have just re-added the {{primarysources}} tag to the article as the above editor supports it's usage. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Not in the state of the article currently. He's fine with it so long as the stuff that is currently gone is gone. I'll be removing it, again.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:18, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Okay, but you should know that it still needs to be there, but I don't feel like edit warring over a tag. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:22, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

If you read Onorem's statement, he only agreed when it had the content you removed, which I have since also removed.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I re-read the statement following your previous reply. When I said "but you should know that it still needs to be there", that was because of policies and guidelines and not because of Onorem. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Whatever.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Rick22225/Yardleyman/Gerhardt Lammers

Remember users Yardleyman and Gerhardt Lammers being confirmed as having the same IP as Rick22225? Take a look at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Rick22225 again. It seems that an IP editor is a sockpuppet of Rick22225 given its edits. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 02:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Versageek informed me of the IP address in private. They are not related.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

So you're saying the investigation is moot? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 02:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

An investigation of the IP might be fruitful, but frankly I don't give a shit.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, then we'll wait until a checkuser says whether or not the IP is a sockpuppet of someone else or not. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 02:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Arbitration remedy

Could you please respond to my post here? Thanks. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 07:09, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

This is something under the umbrage of ArbCom.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 07:11, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

So you'll just stay out of? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:17, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

What the arbcom wants to do about you is what I will let them do.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:17, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

So you're neutral in regards to each proposal? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Leave me alone.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Myth, I might suggest you stay off of this page and away from Ryu for the time being. It would be probably for the best to take a vacation from each other, at least for a while. rootology/equality 05:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Why a "vacation from each other"? And is this because of Ryulong saying "Leave me alone"? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

If a user asks another to leave his talk page, especially in the midst of this whole RFAR thing, it's usually customary and a good idea to acquiesce. rootology/equality 05:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

So you're saying you were giving me an extra caution? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Nope, I was just asking nicely, since you guys both just went through the wringer, to avoid each other a bit, so you can both have some peace and quiet. rootology/equality 05:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

What are your views of when I contacted the "Ryulong" account on Youtube? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Consider this an official warning as of this moment. You're thisclose to picking up an AC restriction here against badgering questions on people's talk pages. I don't have an opinion as I haven't followed the case, but I am telling you right now that if you edit this page again after I post this warning and the adjacent one to your talk page, you will lose your editing priveledges for a minimum of 24 hours' time. There is no need for this. Please stop, immediately. rootology/equality 05:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Soulcalibur

Hello,

I've been told to whack you with a trout and to direct you there. Erigu (talk) 10:05, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Ebi

Sorry, I looked it up here and it said shrimp, prawn and sniny lobster, which appears more similar to a shrimp to me... - Pokemega32 (talk) 01:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Check Decapoda and then look at its Japanese Misplaced Pages article.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)