Revision as of 20:26, 24 May 2009 edit82.16.113.24 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:28, 24 May 2009 edit undo82.16.113.24 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| nominee2 = ] | | nominee2 = ] | ||
| party2 = Republican Party (United States) | | party2 = Republican Party (United States) | ||
| home_state2 = ] | | home_state2 = ] | ||
| running_mate2 = ] | | running_mate2 = ] | ||
| electoral_vote2 = 8 | | electoral_vote2 = 8 |
Revision as of 20:28, 24 May 2009
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Presidential election results map. Red denotes states won by Landon/Knox, Blue denotes those won by Roosevelt/Garner. Numbers indicate the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The United States presidential election of 1936 was the most lopsided presidential election in the history of the United States (in terms of electoral votes; in terms of popular vote, it was the third-most). The election took place as the Great Depression entered its eighth year. Incumbent President Franklin D. Roosevelt was still working to push the provisions of his New Deal economic policy through Congress and the courts. However, the New Deal policies he had already enacted, such as Social Security and unemployment benefits, had proven to be highly popular with most Americans. Roosevelt's Republican opponent was Governor Alf Landon of Kansas, a political moderate. Although some political pundits predicted a close race, Roosevelt would win the greatest electoral landslide since the beginning of the current U.S. two-party system in the 1850s, carrying all but 8 electoral votes. Roosevelt won 60.8% of the national popular vote, the second highest popular-vote percentage won by a U.S.presidential candidate since 1820.
Nominations
Democratic Party nomination
Main article: 1936 Democratic National Convention- President Franklin D. Roosevelt of New York
- Former Assistant Secretary of War Henry S. Breckinridge of New York
President Roosevelt faced only one primary opponent other than favorite sons. Henry S. Breckinridge, an anti-New Deal lawyer from New York, filed to run against Roosevelt in four primaries. Breckinridge's test of the popularity of the New Deal among Democrats failed, as he lost by wide margins. In New Jersey, President Roosevelt did not file for the preference vote and lost that primary to Breckinridge, though he did receive 19% of the vote on write-ins. Roosevelt's candidates for delegate swept the race in New Jersey and elsewhere. In other primaries, Breckinridge's best showing was his 15% in Maryland. Overall, Roosevelt received 93% of the primary vote, compared to 2% for Breckinridge .
The Democratic Party Convention was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The delegates unanimously renominated incumbents President Franklin Roosevelt and Vice President John Nance Garner. At Roosevelt's request, the two-thirds rule, which had given the South a veto power, was repealed.
Presidential Ballot | Vice Presidential Ballot | ||
---|---|---|---|
Franklin D. Roosevelt | 1100 | John Nance Garner | 1100 |
Republican Party nomination
- Governor Alf Landon of Kansas
- Senator William Edgar Borah of Idaho
- Owner and publisher Frank Knox of Illinois
Although many candidates sought the Republican nomination, only two, Governor Landon and Senator Borah, were considered to be serious candidates. While favorite sons County Attorney Earl Warren of California, Governor Warren E. Green of South Dakota, and Stephen A. Day of Ohio won their respective primaries, the 70-year-old Borah, a well-known progressive and "insurgent," carried the Wisconsin, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Oregon primaries, while also performing quite strongly in Knox's Illinois and Green's South Dakota. However, the party machinery almost uniformly backed Landon, a wealthy businessman and centrist, who won primaries in Massachusetts and New Jersey and dominated in the caucuses and at state party conventions.
With Knox withdrawing as Landon's selection for Vice President and Day, Green, and Warren releasing their delegates, the tally at the convention was:
- Alfred Landon 984
- William E. Borah 19
Other nominations
Many people expected Huey Long, the colorful Democratic senator from Louisiana, to run as a third-party candidate with his "Share Our Wealth" program as his platform, but his bid was cut short when he was assassinated in September 1935. It was later revealed by historian and Long biographer T. Harry Williams that Long had never, in fact, intended to run for the presidency in 1936. Instead, he had been plotting with Father Charles Coughlin, a Catholic priest and populist talk radio personality, to run someone else on the soon-to-be-formed "Share Our Wealth" Party ticket. According to Williams, the idea was that this candidate would split the left-wing vote with President Roosevelt, thereby electing a Republican president and proving the electoral appeal of SOW. Long would then wait four years and run for president as a Democrat in 1940.
Prior to Long's death, leading contenders for the role of the sacrificial 1936 candidate included Senators Burton K. Wheeler (D-Montana) and William E. Borah (R-Idaho) and Governor Floyd B. Olson (FL-Minnesota). After the assassination, however, the two senators lost interest in the idea and Olson was diagnosed with terminal stomach cancer.
Father Coughlin, who had allied himself with Dr. Francis Townsend, a left-wing political activist who was pushing for the creation of an old-age pension system, and Rev. Gerald L.K. Smith, a well-known white supremacist and spokesman for the Christian Right, was eventually forced to run Congressman William Lemke (R-North Dakota) as the candidate of the newly-created "Union Party." Lemke, who lacked the charisma and national stature of the other potential candidates, fared poorly in the election, barely managing 2% of the vote, and the party was dissolved the following year.
William Dudley Pelley, Chief of the Silver Shirts Legion, ran on the ballot in Washington state, managing to secure less than 2,000 votes.
General election
Campaign
The election was held on November 3, 1936.
This election is notable for the Literary Digest poll, which was based on 10 million questionnaires mailed to readers and potential readers; over two million were returned. The Literary Digest, which had correctly predicted the winner of the last 5 elections, announced in its October 31 issue that Landon would be the winner with 370 electoral votes. The cause of this mistake is believed to be due to improper sampling: more Republicans subscribed to the Literary Digest than Democrats, and were thus more likely to vote for Landon than Roosevelt. This mistake by the Literary Digest proved to be devastating to the magazine's credibility, and in fact the magazine went out of existence within a few months of the election.
That same year, George Gallup, an advertising executive who had begun a scientific poll, predicted that Roosevelt would win the election, based on a quota sample of 50,000 people. He also predicted that the Literary Digest would mis-predict the results. His correct predictions made public opinion polling a critical element of elections for journalists and indeed for politicians. The Gallup Poll would become a staple of future presidential elections, and remains one of the most prominent election polling organizations to this day.
Roosevelt won by a landslide, carrying 46 of the 48 states and bringing in many additional Democratic members of Congress. After Lyndon Johnson in 1964, Roosevelt's 60.8% of the popular vote is the second-largest percentage in U.S. history since the nearly unopposed election of James Monroe in 1820 and his 98.5% of the electoral vote is the highest in two-party competition. Roosevelt won the largest number of electoral votes ever recorded at that time, so far only surpassed by Ronald Reagan in the 1984 election, when 7 more electoral votes were available. Some political pundits predicted the Republicans, whom many voters blamed for the Great Depression, would soon become an extinct political party. However, the Republicans would make a strong comeback in the 1938 congressional elections and would remain a potent force in Congress, although they were not able to win the presidency again until 1952.
The Electoral College results, in which Landon only won Maine and Vermont, inspired Democratic party chairman James Farley to amend the then-conventional political wisdom of "As Maine goes, so goes the nation" into "As goes Maine, so goes Vermont." Additionally, a prankster posted a sign on Vermont's border with New Hampshire the day after the 1936 election; it read: "You are now leaving the United States."
Results
Presidential candidate | Party | Home state | Popular vote | Electoral vote |
Running mate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Count | Percentage | Vice-presidential candidate | Home state | Electoral vote | ||||
Franklin D. Roosevelt | Democratic | New York | 27,752,648 | 60.8% | 523 | John Nance Garner | Texas | 523 |
Alfred Mossman Landon | Republican | Kansas | 16,681,862 | 36.5% | 8 | William Franklin Knox | Illinois | 8 |
William Lemke | Union | North Dakota | 892,378 | 2.0% | 0 | Thomas C. O'Brien | Massachusetts | 0 |
Norman Thomas | Socialist | New York | 187,910 | 0.4% | 0 | George A. Nelson | Wisconsin | 0 |
Earl Browder | Communist | Kansas | 79,315 | 0.2% | 0 | James W. Ford | New York | 0 |
Other | 53,586 | 0.1% | — | Other | — | |||
Total | 45,647,699 | 100% | 531 | 531 | ||||
Needed to win | 266 | 266 |
Source (Popular Vote): Leip, David. "1936 Presidential Election Results". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved July 31, 2005.
Source (Electoral Vote): "Electoral College Box Scores 1789–1996". National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved July 31, 2005.
Results by state
Franklin Roosevelt
Democratic |
Alfred Landon
Republican |
William Lemke
Union |
Other | State Total | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | electoral votes |
# | % | electoral votes |
# | % | electoral votes |
# | % | electoral votes |
# | % | electoral votes |
# | ||
Alabama | 11 | 238,136 | 86.4 | 11 | 35,358 | 12.8 | - | 551 | 0.2 | - | 1,639 | 0.6 | - | 275,244 | AL | |
Arizona | 3 | 86,722 | 69.9 | 3 | 33,433 | 26.9 | - | 3,307 | 2.7 | - | 701 | 0.6 | - | 124,163 | AZ | |
Arkansas | 9 | 146,765 | 81.8 | 9 | 32,039 | 17.9 | - | 4 | 0.0 | - | 615 | 0.3 | - | 179,423 | AR | |
California | 22 | 1,766,836 | 67.0 | 22 | 836,431 | 31.7 | - | not on ballot | 35,615 | 1.4 | - | 2,638,882 | CA | |||
Colorado | 6 | 295,021 | 60.4 | 6 | 181,267 | 37.1 | - | 9,962 | 2.0 | - | 2,434 | 0.5 | - | 488,684 | CO | |
Connecticut | 8 | 382,129 | 55.3 | 8 | 278,685 | 40.4 | - | 21,805 | 3.2 | - | 8,104 | 1.2 | - | 690,723 | CT | |
Delaware | 3 | 69,702 | 54.6 | 3 | 57,236 | 44.9 | - | 442 | 0.4 | - | 223 | 0.2 | - | 127,603 | DE | |
Florida | 7 | 249,117 | 76.1 | 7 | 78,248 | 23.9 | - | not on ballot | 327,365 | FL | ||||||
Georgia | 12 | 255,364 | 87.1 | 12 | 36,942 | 12.6 | - | 141 | 0.1 | - | 728 | 0.3 | - | 293,175 | GA | |
Idaho | 4 | 125,683 | 63.0 | 4 | 66,256 | 33.2 | - | 7,678 | 3.9 | - | not on ballot | 199,617 | ID | |||
Illinois | 29 | 2,282,999 | 57.7 | 29 | 1,570,393 | 39.7 | - | 89,439 | 2.3 | - | 13,691 | 0.4 | - | 3,956,522 | IL | |
Indiana | 14 | 934,974 | 56.6 | 14 | 691,570 | 41.9 | - | 19,407 | 1.2 | - | 4,946 | 0.3 | - | 1,650,897 | IN | |
Iowa | 11 | 621,756 | 54.4 | 11 | 487,977 | 42.7 | - | 29,687 | 2.6 | - | 3,313 | 0.3 | - | 1,142,733 | IA | |
Kansas | 9 | 464,520 | 53.7 | 9 | 397,727 | 46.0 | - | 497 | 0.1 | - | 2,770 | 0.3 | - | 865,014 | KS | |
Kentucky | 11 | 541,944 | 58.5 | 11 | 369,702 | 39.9 | - | 12,501 | 1.4 | - | 2,056 | 0.2 | - | 926,203 | KY | |
Louisiana | 10 | 292,894 | 88.8 | 10 | 36,791 | 11.2 | - | not on ballot | 93 | 0.0 | - | 329,778 | LA | |||
Maine | 5 | 126,333 | 41.5 | - | 168,823 | 55.5 | 5 | 7,581 | 2.5 | - | 1,503 | 0.5 | - | 304,240 | ME | |
Maryland | 8 | 389,612 | 62.4 | 8 | 231,435 | 37.0 | - | not on ballot | 3,849 | 0.6 | - | 624,896 | MD | |||
Massachusetts | 17 | 942,716 | 51.2 | 17 | 768,613 | 41.8 | - | 118,639 | 6.5 | - | 10,389 | 0.6 | - | 1,840,357 | MA | |
Michigan | 19 | 1,016,794 | 56.3 | 19 | 699,733 | 38.8 | - | 75,795 | 4.2 | - | 12,776 | 0.7 | - | 1,805,098 | MI | |
Minnesota | 11 | 698,811 | 61.8 | 11 | 350,461 | 31.0 | - | 74,296 | 6.6 | - | 6,407 | 0.6 | - | 1,129,975 | MN | |
Mississippi | 9 | 157,318 | 97.1 | 9 | 4,443 | 2.7 | - | not on ballot | 329 | 0.2 | - | 162,090 | MS | |||
Missouri | 15 | 1,111,043 | 60.8 | 15 | 697,891 | 38.2 | - | 14,630 | 0.8 | - | 5,071 | 0.3 | - | 1,828,635 | MO | |
Montana | 4 | 159,690 | 69.3 | 4 | 63,598 | 27.6 | - | 5,549 | 2.4 | - | 1,675 | 0.7 | - | 230,512 | MT | |
Nebraska | 7 | 347,445 | 57.1 | 7 | 247,731 | 40.7 | - | 12,847 | 2.1 | - | not on ballot | 608,023 | NE | |||
Nevada | 3 | 31,925 | 72.8 | 3 | 11,923 | 27.2 | - | not on ballot | 43,848 | NV | ||||||
New Hampshire | 4 | 108,460 | 49.7 | 4 | 104,642 | 48.0 | - | 4,819 | 2.2 | - | 193 | 0.1 | - | 218,114 | NH | |
New Jersey | 16 | 1,083,549 | 59.6 | 16 | 719,421 | 39.6 | - | 9,405 | 0.5 | - | 6,752 | 0.4 | - | 1,819,127 | NJ | |
New Mexico | 3 | 106,037 | 62.7 | 3 | 61,727 | 36.5 | - | 924 | 0.6 | - | 448 | 0.3 | - | 169,176 | NM | |
New York | 47 | 3,293,222 | 58.9 | 47 | 2,180,670 | 39.0 | - | not on ballot | 122,506 | 2.2 | - | 5,596,398 | NY | |||
North Carolina | 13 | 616,141 | 73.4 | 13 | 223,283 | 26.6 | - | 2 | 0.0 | - | 38 | 0.0 | - | 839,464 | NC | |
North Dakota | 4 | 163,148 | 59.6 | 4 | 72,751 | 26.6 | - | 36,708 | 13.4 | - | 1,109 | 0.4 | - | 273,716 | ND | |
Ohio | 26 | 1,747,140 | 58.0 | 26 | 1,127,855 | 37.4 | - | 132,212 | 4.4 | - | 5,382 | 0.2 | - | 3,012,589 | OH | |
Oklahoma | 11 | 501,069 | 66.8 | 11 | 245,122 | 32.7 | - | not on ballot | 3,549 | 0.5 | - | 749,740 | OK | |||
Oregon | 5 | 266,733 | 64.4 | 5 | 122,706 | 29.6 | - | 21,831 | 5.3 | - | 2,751 | 0.7 | - | 414,021 | OR | |
Pennsylvania | 36 | 2,353,987 | 56.9 | 36 | 1,690,200 | 40.8 | - | 67,468 | 1.6 | - | 26,771 | 0.7 | - | 4,138,426 | PA | |
Rhode Island | 4 | 165,238 | 53.1 | 4 | 125,031 | 40.2 | - | 19,569 | 6.3 | - | 1,340 | 0.4 | - | 311,178 | RI | |
South Carolina | 8 | 113,791 | 98.6 | 8 | 1,646 | 1.4 | - | not on ballot | 115,437 | SC | ||||||
South Dakota | 4 | 160,137 | 54.0 | 4 | 125,977 | 42.5 | - | 10,338 | 3.5 | - | not on ballot | 296,472 | SD | |||
Tennessee | 11 | 328,083 | 68.9 | 11 | 146,520 | 30.8 | - | 296 | 0.1 | - | 1,639 | 0.3 | - | 476,538 | TN | |
Texas | 23 | 734,485 | 87.1 | 23 | 103,874 | 12.3 | - | 3,281 | 0.4 | - | 1,842 | 0.2 | - | 843,482 | TX | |
Utah | 4 | 150,246 | 69.3 | 4 | 64,555 | 29.8 | - | 1,121 | 0.5 | - | 755 | 0.4 | - | 216,677 | UT | |
Vermont | 3 | 62,124 | 43.2 | - | 81,023 | 56.4 | 3 | not on ballot | 542 | 0.4 | - | 143,689 | VT | |||
Virginia | 11 | 234,980 | 70.2 | 11 | 98,336 | 29.4 | - | 233 | 0.1 | - | 1,041 | 0.3 | - | 334,590 | VA | |
Washington | 8 | 459,579 | 66.4 | 8 | 206,892 | 29.9 | - | 17,463 | 2.5 | - | 8,404 | 1.2 | - | 692,338 | WA | |
West Virginia | 8 | 502,582 | 60.6 | 8 | 325,358 | 39.2 | - | not on ballot | 2,005 | 0.2 | - | 829,945 | WV | |||
Wisconsin | 12 | 802,984 | 63.8 | 12 | 380,828 | 30.3 | - | 60,297 | 4.8 | - | 14,451 | 1.1 | - | 1,258,560 | WI | |
Wyoming | 3 | 62,624 | 60.6 | 3 | 38,739 | 37.5 | - | 1,653 | 1.6 | - | 366 | 0.4 | - | 103,382 | WY | |
TOTALS: | 531 | 27,752,648 | 60.8 | 523 | 16,681,862 | 36.5 | 8 | 892,378 | 2.0 | - | 320,811 | 0.7 | - | 45,647,699 | ||
TO WIN: | 266 |
Close states
New Hampshire, 1.75%
Bibliography
- Kristi Andersen, The Creation of a Democratic Majority: 1928-1936 (1979), statistical
- James McGregor Burns, Roosevelt: The Lion and the Fox (1956)
- Fadely, James Philip. "Editors, Whistle Stops, and Elephants: the Presidential Campaign of 1936 in Indiana." Indiana Magazine of History 1989 85(2): 101-137. Issn: 0019-6673
- William E. Leuchtenburg, "Election of 1936", in Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., ed., A History of American Presidential Elections vol 3 (1971), analysis and primary documents
- Donald McCoy, Landon of Kansas (1968)
- Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Politics of Upheaval (1960), online version
References
See also
External links
- 1936 popular vote by counties
- How close was the 1936 election? - Michael Sheppard, Michigan State University