Misplaced Pages

User talk:194.124.140.39: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:39, 26 May 2009 editDave souza (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators48,697 edits →Talk:Evolutionary argument against naturalism: edit warring again← Previous edit Revision as of 08:09, 29 May 2009 edit undoDave souza (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators48,697 edits →Talk:Evolutionary argument against naturalism: 3RR againNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:


:As of today, you're again edit warring against a clear consensus of experienced editors. This single purpose IP will be blocked again if you continue. . . ], ] 07:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC) :As of today, you're again edit warring against a clear consensus of experienced editors. This single purpose IP will be blocked again if you continue. . . ], ] 07:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

]
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{#if:|, as you are doing at ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> The old discussions you keep reinserting into the talk page are available in the archive, if you've specific points to discuss then start a new discussion on the talk page stating your case concisely. Continuing to reinsert stale discussions will merely get you blocked. . . ], ] 08:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:09, 29 May 2009

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 06:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Evolutionary argument against naturalism

Warning
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Guettarda (talk) 23:50, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

The page was protected because you (a) refused to stop edit warring, and (b) evaded your block. Since you chose to evade your block, you left the blocking admin no choice but to semi-protect the page. Your behaviour precipitated the actions. So far, you've shown utter contempt for the expected standards of behaviour. It's up to you to convince him that you'll act properly in the future. Guettarda (talk) 06:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

  1. I did not protect the page.
  2. It was your behaviour that got the page protected, so it's really up to you to get it unprotected
  3. You need to familiarise yourself with our policy on original research
  4. You should really familiarise yourself with ID before you make claims about what it is or isn't. Guettarda (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

You have violated the 3-revert rule yet again. Guettarda (talk) 14:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. The duration of the block is 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question. William M. Connolley (talk) 22:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
As of today, you're again edit warring against a clear consensus of experienced editors. This single purpose IP will be blocked again if you continue. . . dave souza, talk 07:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Warning
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. The old discussions you keep reinserting into the talk page are available in the archive, if you've specific points to discuss then start a new discussion on the talk page stating your case concisely. Continuing to reinsert stale discussions will merely get you blocked. . . dave souza, talk 08:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)