| Revision as of 05:52, 10 June 2009 editGrandmaster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,547 edits →June 2009← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:13, 12 June 2009 edit undoDeacon of Pndapetzim (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators39,755 edits →AA 2 warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| Hi. Please see this report: ]] 05:51, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | Hi. Please see this report: ]] 05:51, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == ] warning == | |||
| Please be aware of ]. Per , it is clear that your editing consists of little but blanket reverts often with insulting edit-summaries. Please read ], for our definitions of what is and what is not vandalism. Use of the Azeri language in article leads is definitely not vandalism. Be aware that should this continue, you will become subject to editing restrictions. ] (<small>]</small>) 08:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:13, 12 June 2009
|
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Karabakh khanate
mrb
karabağ hanlığı sayfasına "azerbaycan tarihi" şablonunun da konulması gerekir.bu vandlizm değil. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.233.145.106 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 1 February 2009
- This is Turkish (e.g. wikt:değil, and translates to:
- It is necessary to keep the template of {{History of Azerbaijan}} in the article about Karabakh khanate. It is not vandalism
- John Vandenberg 16:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Baku Khanate
Could you please check the accuracy of Baku Khanate article--St. Hubert (talk) 21:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Karabakh Khanate has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ipatrol (talk) 23:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Karabakh Khanate constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Ipatrol (talk) 23:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Grandmaster 05:52, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
WP:AE
Hi. Please see this report: Grandmaster 05:51, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
AA 2 warning
Please be aware of Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan_2#Amended_Remedies_and_Enforcement. Per the recent Arbitration Enforcement thread, it is clear that your editing consists of little but blanket reverts often with insulting edit-summaries. Please read Misplaced Pages:VAND#NOT, for our definitions of what is and what is not vandalism. Use of the Azeri language in article leads is definitely not vandalism. Be aware that should this continue, you will become subject to editing restrictions. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 08:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)